Woman who claims affair with Herman Cain says she will describe his private body parts to Congress.

Daily Mail ^ | April 18, 2019 | Emily Crane

[faucetman]

A “tattoo”? Something he should go see Dr. Pimple Popper for? A piercing? It’s “white!”

[2CAVTrooper]

“Her attorney, Gloria Allred,”

That’s all I need to know right there.

Everytime she’s involved, it’s a professional political assassination.

[Boomer]

Another classy dem rears her ugly ‘head’. /s

[Larry Lucido]

I bet I could describe her private body parts. Prove me wrong.

[Larry Lucido]

I bet I could describe her private body parts. Prove me wrong.

From all the times she stalked me, I mean.

[Tell It Right]

"Her attorney, Gloria Allred…"

That's all anybody needs to know that it's all a lie.

[hal ogen]

The congressional perverts will like her describing in detail another man’s private body parts. I bet they’ll have her testify many times.

[Erik Latranyi]

Democrats told us that an affair is a “private matter” and does not have any impact on job performance.

[Erik Latranyi]

If the affair existed, it was consensual......she was not forced into the affair. She willingly participated.

How is this different from Kamala Harris having an affair with Mayor Willie Brown?

No different and irrelevant to their qualifications for the job.

[Erik Latranyi]

I bet I could describe her private body parts. Prove me wrong.

[Maurice Tift]

Cain should threaten to describe Gloria Allred’s private body parts.

[Chickensoup]

I guess the appropriate response by Cain is “So what?”

[Chickensoup]

So right

they are trying to Alinsky him in the eyes of conservatives.

[piasa]

'I ask Herman, if I never had a relationship with you, how would I be in the position to describe parts of your body that are not visible,'

Oh, so o defend himself he is supposed to strip naked and appear before congress in he nude, or present third-party photographs, a which point he libs can accuse him of indecent exposure or porn. Riiiiiight.

[RouxStir]

Who cares???

[piasa]

We already know from past reports that Cain had multiple affairs with women.

Do we? It was all part of the same smear. We already know from past reports that Trump had colluded with Russians. /s

[piasa]

That’s why democrats always escape- they have no rules to be held to.

[Reno89519]

He admitted it, discussed it. Not sure why anyone is belaboring the point it was already out, he already discussed it, it is old news.

[Flaming Conservative]

I read multiple comments here, about how him having an affair is meaningless, and has nothing to do with his job qualifications. My concern is not that he did or didn’t have an affair, (though adultery is no small matter), but whether or not he is being truthful. Of course, none of us have any way of knowing that, but that is my concern. If he had an affair, he should admit it, then move on, since, sadly, no one seems to think that’s a problem, anymore, anyway. If he did NOT have an affair, he should not back down. His backing down from his presidential run is unfortunate, since it serves as an impetus for his detractors to use it against him, though I can understand why he did it, even if he was NOT guilty.
Having said all that, liberals and other globalists are terrified at the thought of having a Herman Cain at the Fed. And that, alone, is reason to confirm him.

[piasa]

Never heard him admit or discuss it. If he did, then why don’t the dems just produce those tapes?