Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mueller report ignites new Dem battle over impeachment
Fox News ^ | 4/19/19 | Judson Berger

Posted on 04/19/2019 6:30:51 AM PDT by Libloather

Just a month after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi unequivocally stated her opposition to impeachment proceedings against President Trump, the Robert Mueller report has reignited the debate inside her caucus.

“Mueller’s report is clear in pointing to Congress’ responsibility in investigating obstruction of justice by the President,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., tweeted, announcing she’ll sign onto Rep. Rashida Tlaib’s, D-Mich., resolution urging the House Judiciary Committee to probe whether Trump committed impeachment-level offenses.

The sprawling and detailed Mueller report released Thursday, while effectively clearing the president and his associates on the Russia collusion charge central to the probe, outlined a series of Trump actions that were investigated as part of the obstruction-of-justice inquiry. Mueller did not reach a determination on that issue, but provided a cornucopia of dramatic anecdotes showing the president trying to curtail the special counsel investigation.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: aoc; impeachment; mueller; rats; trump; trumprussia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Libloather

When will House Speaker Cortez tell back-bencher Representative Pelosi to get on board the impeachment train?


21 posted on 04/19/2019 7:20:59 AM PDT by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

He was not DJT’s personal attorney.

Privilege is much more limited.


22 posted on 04/19/2019 7:22:22 AM PDT by jjotto (Next week, BOOM!, for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bankwalker

I get what you’re saying. There were (and still are) Republican sympathizers and enablers. But the key players were all Dems and, if what Sara Carter says is true, they are already turning on each other.

The cabal’s nefarious activities were originated and executed mainly by Democrat operatives. The scope and brazenness of their plot will overshadow any Republican participants in my opinion.


23 posted on 04/19/2019 7:22:55 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter

The president did not invoke executive privilege over this matter. Of course, he wanted Mueller fired. What sane man wouldn’t? He did nothing to warrant the investigation. All he did was run for president. And the party in power abused their offices in order to spy on their opponentS. They worked with foreign governments and continue to work against the people of this country.

APPEAL TO HEAVEN


24 posted on 04/19/2019 7:29:20 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They’re still trying their end run on the facts!


25 posted on 04/19/2019 7:44:37 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They’re still trying their end run on the facts!


26 posted on 04/19/2019 7:45:31 AM PDT by SMARTY ("Nobility is defined by the demands it makes on us - by obligations, not by rights".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The Dems pursuing impeachment will virtually guarantee a second term.

It is all playing out as well as Q said it would.


27 posted on 04/19/2019 7:50:24 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

28 posted on 04/19/2019 7:58:18 AM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Trying to find any “technicality” to impeach the president over.

Too little, too late. The hammer is about to fall .... BOOM!

“revenge is a dish best served cold”


29 posted on 04/19/2019 8:01:26 AM PDT by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: liberalh8ter
".... wouldn’t any conversation between McGahn and PDJT be protected as attorney client privilege?..."

It should be and I think McGahn violated that ethical code.

The fact the Trump wanted to stop the Mueller investigation and the fact that he didn't actually do anything to bring that about except talk about it, is the key here.

Trump may have wanted Sessions, Rosenstein and Mueller out of the picture but he never took any overt action to make that happen.

No obstruction if he just talked about it but didn't take any action.

The one guy he did fire, Comey, was recommended to be canned in a letter from none other than Rosenstein himself.

Much to do about nothing.

30 posted on 04/19/2019 8:10:24 AM PDT by HotHunt (Been there. Done that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: jjotto
Thank you for answering my question. I wasn’t sure about White House Counsel as to whether they would fall under attorney client privilege or not.
31 posted on 04/19/2019 8:11:43 AM PDT by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

“level of ‘culpability” Is the key to the issue.

Too many attorneys getting this obstruction issue muddled up. Lemmee splain.

Mueller did not find an underlying crime in the collusion/conspiracy allegation.

That means that Trump’s push back, complaints, that is, any effort to derail the investigation must have a motive that is not corrupt.

However, if you are trying to cover up a crime or derail an investigation that discovers a crime....... Then you have obstruction.

The press and all the analysts are not being clear about that.

Now the House can try to vote to impeach for “high crimes and misdemeanors”.

Nadler can’t create a crime. Pelosi isn’t going to waste the House’s time on abstruse legal theories without cooperation from a Federal prosecutor.


32 posted on 04/19/2019 8:49:23 AM PDT by gandalftb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HotHunt

The world of the left is so funny makes ribs hurt.


33 posted on 04/19/2019 9:27:38 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: FreedBird

At the beginning of this week, I signed up for a monthly donation to Trump. It’s the first time I’ve ever given to any candidate. 95% of his fundraising is less than $200 donations, and a large fraction are $5. Normal Americans are sick to death of this endless crap by these unAmerican bastards.


34 posted on 04/19/2019 9:53:21 AM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

The report looks like a tasty tidbit to the Democrats but it contains a hook that they may have trouble spitting out if they use it to impeach.

It looks entirely possible that they may want to back out of impeachment if the inspector general’s report results in indictments for falsely starting the whole thing.

There are rumblings that it may happen.


35 posted on 04/19/2019 10:53:25 AM PDT by Tom Bombadil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson