Posted on 08/13/2019 7:55:16 AM PDT by rktman
Changing the definition of something is a Machiavellian and evil machination used by neo-Leninist politicians to mislead the citizenry into believing something that deprives us of our constitutional rights is good for us. That is exactly what malicious politicians and the corrupt organizations operating at their beck and call are doing in their commitment to deprive us of our Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms.” Let me explain as simply as I can.
They are using the mass shootings, which proliferated exponentially immediately after Obama was elected in 2008, (See: “Obama: The Mouth Who Loves To Hear Itself Talk,” mychal-massie.com, Aug. 8, 2019), as the cause célèbre to demand all AR-15 rifles be outlawed. And they are doing it by redefining the truthful definition of “assault rifle.” Following that sleight of hand, ignorant uninformed marplots masquerading as intellectuals are presented on equally uninformed and dishonest news and talk programming to further mislead the uninformed public.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I’m still proposing signs saying this is a murder free zone :). Maybe if you lay the gun free zone sign atop the murder free zone, you can use them as a shield. Writing up my proposal this weekend.
Same plan works well in the ocean with SHARK FREE ZONE signs.
Anyone who pretends to know what an “assault rifle” is, is either stupid, lying, or both!
The same people who want us disarmed also want us enslaved or dead.
Never forget that.
Here’s the Formula: Hatred + Government + Disarmed Civilians = Genocide
What makes the argument so powerful? Two factors.
First, it makes common sense: unarmed defenseless people have no hope against armed
aggressors.
Second, it states the historical truth: evil governments did wipe out 170,000,000 innocent non-military lives in the 20th Century alone.
When the gun prohibitionists quote a statistic about how many people are killed by firearms misuse, the discussion sometimes bogs down into whose crime statistics to believe and how to count crimes vs. the defensive firearm uses.
In the 20th Century:
• Governments murdered four times as many civilians as were killed in all the international and domestic wars combined.
• Governments murdered millions more people than were killed by common criminals.
How could governments kill so many people? The governments had the power - and the people, the victims, were unable to resist. The victims were unarmed.
For the chilling reality after National Gun Control is enacted go to the link below:
http://jpfo.org/pdf02/genocide-chart.pdf
Thanks to SanchoP for finding and posting this ultimate argument against any national gun
control!
“Anyone”?
Right! 2A applies to ALL kinds of weapon. People try to say it doesn’t apply to artillery or explosives. THAT’S CRAP.
If a rich guy or a corporation wanted to run an aircraft carrier, the Constitution protects a right to do that.
People wring their hands and say “clearly this doesn’t apply to nuclear weapons.” But I ask them this: Can the government own nukes? If so, then so can we (if the Constitution was enforced, that is).
There is nothing to fear from LAW-ABIDING, FREE CITIZENS who happen to be armed — unless you are a tyrant. I’d trust my neighbors with an H-bomb more than I trusted Obama to control them (luckily, our military kept Obama from using them).
As things stand now Fedzilla could use the threat of nuclear attack to BLACKMAIL any community into obedience and we’d be helpless! Not even state governments are allowed to have nukes. It’s NUTS!
What this means is that we THINK we’re free. But we’re free only as much and for as long as Fedzilla says we are. We are, essentially, subjects, not citizens.
And now our masters want to take our guns away.
Constitutional limits on 2Amd are economic. I probably do not have the funds on hand to purchase an ICBM or a self propelled howitzer. I would at least have to wait until the price comes down as last year’s models go on sale to clear inventory.
If you can afford it, you should be able to have it — with no government reporting or oversight requirements. Otherwise, we are NOT a free people. And we’re not.
I also believe every state needs a nuclear arsenal to protect itself from Fedzilla blackmail.
Don’t give up your guns.
they are doing it by redefining the truthful definition of “assault rifle.” Following that sleight of hand, ignorant uninformed marplots masquerading as intellectuals are presented on equally uninformed and dishonest news and talk programming to further mislead the uninformed public.
Then sprinkled through public gatherings are fellow
travelers following the Delphi technique and manipulating
the uninformed public into supporting their own enslavement
and loss of civil rights.
We are seeing this everyday.
Kayak!?
Substitute or exchange “or” for “and” and I am with you, Randall.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.