This is simply not true. According to the Social Security administration, it is in the 400’s. The site noted in the article is not an official source, but an online registry for baby stuff.
Don’t buy into this crap.
Fake statistics (isn’t that redundant?) serve to manipulate public perception and thus engender defeatism.
Good post.
Are you just looking up the name "Muhammad" to see where it falls in popularity or are you using the no less than 14 spelling variations and combining them? I think if you account for all the spelling variations, the name becomes much more popular.
Muhammad (or a variation thereof) is traditionally the name given to all first-born sons.
“This is simply not true. According to the Social Security administration, it is in the 400’s.”
Actually it is 345, not horrible like top ten, but not good.
https://www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/babyname.cgi