Posted on 05/26/2020 11:16:19 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
The FBI’s interview of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn about his telephone conversations with Russian Ambassador Kislyak renewed a frequent question: Why doesn’t the FBI record its interviews? After all, if a recording of Flynn’s January 2017 interview were available, and not just a heavily redacted form FD-302, there might not be such controversy about whether Flynn lied to agents about the conversation. Despite the fact that recorded interviews can be helpful, there are good reasons the FBI does not record all interviews — even though a 2014 Department of Justice policy states they should default toward recordings.
First, an estimated 75 to 85 percent of a street agent’s work consists of interviewing people. These interviews come in the form of background investigations, criminal and intelligence investigations, source debriefings and other pertinent conversations. While it’s technically possible to record and store all such conversations, it would be a challenge. Next, if the policy was to record all interviews, then we would be in the same imbroglio that we are in with the Flynn case for any FBI interview that is not recorded. Questions would abound about why a non-recorded interview occurred.
Unlike some other law enforcement agencies, the FBI documents via the 302 case report all interviews, whether they are positive or negative. If agents conducted a canvass of a neighborhood in a bank robbery investigation, for example, a separate 302 would be completed for every individual with whom the agents talk, even if nobody saw anything. Other agencies might do one report reflecting that all the contacts were negative, or might not document anything. Many agencies that record interviews restrict them to subject (or suspect) interviews. They do not record witness interviews, and it has been suggested that the FBI do exactly this.
SNIP
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
To protect the guilty*
"James M. Casey was a law enforcement officer for 32 years, 25 of them at the FBI. He served on the National Security Council in 2004-2005 and retired in 2012 as the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI’s Jacksonville Division. He is president of FCS Global Advisors, an investigative and crisis management firm."
Cause Hillary’s coffee table didn’t have room for that many cassette tapes?
I would never answer any questions from the FB I unless I made my own recording of it.
Sorry, I used to not feel that way; but the days of Efrem Zimbalist Jr. and Jimmy Stewart are long over.
If you’re going after the President of the US in a coup, you should record it. THAT MUCH I KNOW.
They don’t record so they can protect lying and deception by the police.
There’s a video on YouTube where a city police officer discusses police interrogations. The cop said that every interrogation room has hidden recording devices, even when the suspect is assured there are none. No surprise there.
But then the cop said that after the interrogation was over, he’d listen to the recording and make notes. Then he’d erase the recording. He never explained why he did that. I found that to be very puzzling.
Digital media overcomes the authors points
Recorded interviews would, until redacted, show the lies that agents use just like every cop out there
Officially, they don’t.
It’s probably a safe bet that unofficially, they do.
Anyone have a conversation with the FBI is nuts. Anyone having a conversation without counsel present is certifiable. The FBI have been scummy since 9/11.
Trump has all the goods on these idiots
Comey he was completely corrupt as hell and went on some stupid liberal show and bragged about how corrupt he was sending those FBI agents in
trumps got him dead to rights and they know it
so this is all going to be damage control now because Trump is smart enough to let this just got it flow out drip drip drip over the next few months actually and then really hit him with it around September with indictments
Best. Election. Ever
If the “Authorities” are dishonest, it doesn’t matter.
if the “Authorities” are honest, it doesn’t matter.
Strange as it might seem, these statements actually both work.
“If you’re going after the President of the US in a coup, you should record it. THAT MUCH I KNOW.”
NEVER record when engaged in illegal activities.
I understand why the FBI would not want to make recordings of witnesses and people who provide routine information in background investigations. But generally, those statements ARE NOT GOING TO BE USED AS EVIDENCE IN A CRIMINAL PROCEEDING AGAINST THE PERSON MAKING THE STATEMENT!
There is absolutely NO EXCUSE for not recording the statement of the target of a criminal investigation. Unless, of course, you want to lie about what you claim the witness lied about.
God forbid that it is "a challenge" to preserve a suspects civil rights. We wouldn't want an agent to break a sweat over it.
Oh, I am with you on that.
If the FBI wants to talk to me they’ll get nothing but silence. I don’t care if they tell me they’re hot on the trail of the next Bin Laden.
And if I am ever seated on a jury where any of the evidence was in their possession I’m voting to acquit. You all should too.
With interviews recorded only in notes then the information gleaned is what the agent interviewing wants it to be.
How is it possible that
1 a person can be charged with a crime for a “lie” to an FBI agent.
2. there is no need for this FBI agent to produce concrete proof of this “lie” to potentially prosecute
3. LEOs can use trickery, deception or Lies to a person that they are interviewing.
You can not have all three of these things at once.
the “Famous But Incompetent” need to be disbanded and a new interstate law enforcement Agency with strict rules needs to be established. With SEVERELY limited scope.
YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT!
It has been scummy all the time. Just like any govt. agency or every president. Only occasionally we get good one.. by the grace of god.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.