The fact he says “a criminal” rather than “a homicide” charge is startling. That’s big because I figured the prosecutor could get around any autopsy evidence by charging the cop with felony battery as a predicate for a felony murder charge at the least. But he is saying any criminal charge. I’m wondering if there was a weapon - but wouldn’t they fall over themselves announcing that? What evidence could possibly excuse or rebut a felony murder charge based on what we saw? Given the political climate there you know the DA will file if they’ve got the slightest thing to hang their hat on - and that video is powerful. Not arguing with you, just thinking out loud.
You're lying.
This is the same city that circled the wagons over a Somali cop who shot to death the very woman (a foreigner, in her pajamas, at night) who had called 911 to report a possible rape. Shooting from inside the squad car past his partner in the other side of the squad car.
They made the same condescending lying speech about him, too.
He's now serving 12 1/2 years in prison.
And that is significant, because even the FBI sharpshooter who blew VIcki Weaver's head off in Idaho while she was holding her baby in her arms, when they were after her husband, didn't face trial -- in fact he got promoted.