I think he said ‘If there’s not enough...’
I heard his monologue. It was good. The point being even if the fraud wasn’t enough to change the outcome, we still need to address the issue of blatant thievery by the dems.
He’s wrong.
Perhaps the fraud we have found so far might not have been enough tilt election (maybe - we’re finding an awful lot), but more fraud is being found all the time.
And ANY fraud is too much.
It is about damn time we put vote fraud under a microscope.
its a really simple equation...
The Constitution Says this- xxx
The State Law says this- yyy
The State of PA is in violation of both.
Therefore, all ballots after election day are invalid and tossed.
How many is that? Oh, Trump wins PA? Cool.
Next, In Michigan, validate that the software flipped votes.
etc. for Wisconsin, Arizon, Etc.
Here is the alternative: Civil unrest that makes the summer of 2020 look like festivities. Not necessarily rioting an burning because I certainly wouldn’t do that, or condone it. But Civil Unrest on the level of a general strike. Oh LOOK! no tax revenue or GDP for a week, two weeks, etc. And the funny thing is, the side that would be pissed off enough to do this is the employed side. General strike by democrats would be funny to watch since 90% of them are unemployed, or unemployable- in other words, it would have no impact.
Hope he is looking for another job or career for he is done at Fox!
What is there to be confused about?
Tucker is in no position to know the number and scale of the massive ballot fraud that just took place.
He has no attorneys on the ground etc.
The Trump campaign does.
Stop trolling.
Here’s what I’m not getting. The President shouldn’t need to come up with 200,000 cases of individual fraud. If there is clear evidence of systemic disregard for election law in any of these states, then the courts have to act. In Pennsylvania, it’s clear that mail in ballots were counted without Republican observers present. In Wisconsin, it’s obvious and undisputed that there was a “glitch” in vote counting software that changed Republican votes to Democrat votes. Those instances alone should be enough to show that the results in those states are not valid.
There go the last of the Faux News holdouts. Bye Tucker, it was nice knowing you.
Et tu Tucker?
How does he know that? Has he uncovered all the fraud himself?
I think this is taken out of context. Nobody knows if there is enough but there is lots of smoke and it sure looks like there is enough to take it out. He was excellent, but Newsmax was better.
That’s not what he said.
He said he doesn’t know, and it doesn’t matter.
What matters is that all American’s believe in the integrity of our elections.
That’s management talking.
I do worry, like so many things in the past few years in the news, are designed to get us amped up, but then nothing happens.
Nobody went to prison, let alone indicted for the Clinton and Russia scandals. Is this another tease, that Trump has a chance?
He said if there isn’t enough evidence. It wasn’t a declarative statement. It was more of a hypothetical.
Numerically, he “might” be right (at least so far as can be proved) . . . but the SCOTUS is a lot bigger than those numbers. I’d prefer that these guys would just be quiet about it until this thing has run its course.
Anyway, there is no way under God’s heaven that I would cooperate or find “unity” with a government led by a pedophile.
“might not”
One point and one point only needs to be brought up over and over again that proves, yes I said proves fraud.
Are you ready???
ALL of the state’s where the voting fraud is being committed and documented STOPED their counting at the SAME time!!!!!!
They had to manufacture more votes.
And have not provided a single explanation as to why they stopped counting and why did they all stop at the same time?
Fake headline.
just another paid actor ... cancel all teevee ... stop sending money to people that want you dead ...