Well, is he right or not? I am confused...
1 posted on
11/10/2020 5:45:55 AM PST by
ToxicMich
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
To: ToxicMich
Hes under the pressure of leadership at Fox.
To: ToxicMich
They had a “talk” with him about his career future with FOX is what it sounds like to me.
3 posted on
11/10/2020 5:48:03 AM PST by
Openurmind
(The ultimate test of a moral society is the kind of world it leaves to its children. ~ D. Bonhoeffer)
To: ToxicMich
Well, Tucker should contact the President and his many lawyers to let them know. Why waste any more time? GA, PA, WI, AZ, MI can all breathe a sigh of relief.
To: ToxicMich
5 posted on
11/10/2020 5:48:21 AM PST by
CatOwner
To: ToxicMich
Consider the source, folks.
Let’s see a verbatim transcript of what he said before we go off half-cocked, eh?
6 posted on
11/10/2020 5:49:10 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: ToxicMich
We’re surrounded by treason...
To: ToxicMich
And he knows this because .... ?
8 posted on
11/10/2020 5:49:55 AM PST by
pepsi_junkie
(Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
To: All
I dont trust him, Fox, or anybody in the media for that matter. I dont necessarily trust SCOTUS, but Ill do my best to respect whatever they rule and hope it gets that far.
To: ToxicMich
bye bye fauxnews
bye bye tucker : putting $$ ahead of country
another pos exposed by trump phenomenon
10 posted on
11/10/2020 5:49:58 AM PST by
va22030
To: ToxicMich
He is thinking he has to sound like he’s open-minded, and wants the fraud investigated because it’s wrong, not because the president will win. I imagine the person who signs his big, fat paycheck has encouraged him to think this way.
11 posted on
11/10/2020 5:50:09 AM PST by
JudyinCanada
(Aim low, avoid disappointment.)
To: ToxicMich
This was a sentence Faux forced him to say.
There was Massive Main In Ballot fraud.
And many other types of fraud.
Find other alternative to watch.
Faux hates us.
12 posted on
11/10/2020 5:50:29 AM PST by
tennmountainman
( Liberals Are Baby Killers)
To: ToxicMich
How would he know???
Quick answer is....He Doesnt
13 posted on
11/10/2020 5:50:38 AM PST by
gov_bean_ counter
(Potemkin Joe - Everything about him is fake)
To: ToxicMich
Well, he’s kind of right. We have no concrete proof that the extend of the election fraud (and to be sure there definitely was some level of fraud)was enough to alter the outcome...yet. But that is why we investigate. Maybe there is? Who knows? But let’s at least look.
14 posted on
11/10/2020 5:50:43 AM PST by
Sir_Humphrey
(Strong minds discuss ideas, average minds discuss events, weak minds discuss people -Socrates)
To: ToxicMich
15 posted on
11/10/2020 5:50:44 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Break out the mustard seeds.)
To: ToxicMich
I believe he modified it with “probably” or “unlikely” but what else can he do given history and the fact he doesn’t know the whole scope of evidence? he’s hedging bets while getting his point across.
To: ToxicMich
How would Tucker know? Hes not on the legal team and his knowledge goes only as far as what is being shared with him.
17 posted on
11/10/2020 5:51:01 AM PST by
liberalh8ter
(The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
To: ToxicMich
He needs to read the news.
19 posted on
11/10/2020 5:51:11 AM PST by
Rennes Templar
(Heaven has a wall and gates. Hell has open borders.)
To: ToxicMich
I believe he said “may not be enough”
20 posted on
11/10/2020 5:51:17 AM PST by
RonnG
('')
To: ToxicMich
Ok... Tucker is gone
Now it dont matter if he leaves fox or not... he’s a sellout
21 posted on
11/10/2020 5:51:20 AM PST by
Safrguns
To: ToxicMich
Defund Fox. Cancel your Cable,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-105 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson