[mewzilla]

Consider the source, folks.

Let’s see a verbatim transcript of what he said before we go off half-cocked, eh?

[nikos1121]

God, I surely hope he didn’t say that. I’ve shut down Fox since the election. I was hoping that Laura and Tucker were going to hang in there for us.

We’re talking only a few thousand vote difference in several states. All Trump needs to do is turn a couple of them.

It starts with PA. If he can turn the count there, then it’s down hil..

[Eddie01]

Newsweek gaslighting.

I just heard the 20 min. of audio.

Complete lie by Newsweek.

[Hatteras]

"Let’s see a verbatim transcript of what he said before we go off half-cocked, eh?"

Haha, you sure you're not asking a little too much from this crowd?

[dforest]

He said that we do not know how much fraud yet, and it may not be enough to change it.

I would say that he is under pressure by FOX and he is walking a thin line. They probably will not allow him, or guests, to point out specifics other than dead folks voting.

I saw this clip on ScrewTube because I have rid myself of FOX.

[Army Air Corps]

Exactly. Newsweek makes Pravda seem like an honest broker.

[rlmorel]

Hm.

I watched his entire segment on this on YouTube last night, and while I am not 100% sure, I was pretty certain I heard him say “There MAY not be enough fraud to change election results, we should be honest”.

That is how I remember it.

I also thought I heard him say that the point of investigating shouldn’t be to change results (though in this case I believe it SHOULD, since I feel that this fraud is like seeing cockroaches-you only see the tip of the iceberg when one scurries across the floor) but to restore faith in the electoral process, of which there appears to be none (apart from partisan joy at their own candidate winning).

[af_vet_1981]

Consider the source, folks.

Let’s see a verbatim transcript of what he said before we go off half-cocked, eh?

Concur; I watched Tucker Carlson last night and he was spot on; nothing wrong with what he said at all.