Posted on 12/14/2020 10:38:14 PM PST by familyop
"In Michigan, the Secretary of State has ordered deletion of e-poll books and other evidence and also has taken affirmative steps to seal forensic evidence regarding the flaws in the operation of Dominion machines from both the public and from legislators who need access to this information in order to perform their constitutional duty," Kline said. "This joins with the Michigan Attorney General threatening legislators with criminal investigation and possible prosecution if they disagree with her, and the Michigan Governor and other officials shutting down the peoples' house and preventing them from gathering today to perform their constitutional duty."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
It’s not. It’s torches, pitchforks and guns material.
When Mitt Romney admits there might have been fraud then the case is proven beyond me reasonable doubt
“Trump will win this”
Would you mind elaborating to the uneducated please? I could use some good news... so, exactly how?
Cant wait for the prep walk in these states
Both of them have enough votes to win an this point. The question is now, which votes are going to be counted?
VP Pence counts the votes, in the presence of both houses of Congress. Getting two sets of votes from a state is not a new thing. It happened when Hayes was elected—three states each sent in two sets of votes. “They” ultimately decided to count the set for Hayes, and that’s why he was president.
I think the law is that, when all disputes are resolved by the “safe harbor” day, by procedures that were in place before election day (and a few other requirements), Congress is obligated to count the set of votes that the states certify. If all disputes are not resolved, Congress decides what votes to count for a state. Since not all disputes were resolved, which set of electors will count is not fixed.
Which sets of votes get counted will probably depend on the strength of the evidence that one set ought to be counted, and the strength of the public perception.
I think there are rules that determine what happens if part of Congress wishes to dispute the Vice-President’s count, but I don’t know enough about them to talk about them.
Will Michigan de-certify the election now??
The SCOTUS punked out rather than stand up in what will be remembered as one of the most critical moments in all of USA history.
Didn’t want to soil their hands or be held to account.
Yet another useless piece of the swamp exposes itself.
For the rest of my life I will have no pride or trust in the SCOTUS.
May it’s membership go to hell.
IIRC, ALL ELECTION material
Felony to tamper with the records...FEDERAL felony & records MUST be retained for 22 months-—FEDERAL LAW-—
NO exceptions.
IIRC-—It is a FEDERAL felony to certify a fraudulent election.
“IIRC-—It is a FEDERAL felony to certify a fraudulent election.”
but, I believe, the election was certified in all states by the required date when it was not yet proven to be fraudulent.
I complained to a fed once about exactly that kind of violation. It involved a criminal record falsified in more than one way to protect a local favorite son of a _____ from showing in criminal histories in a western state. The fed, after being somewhat of a smart___, finally told me to send the clerk’s office a certified letter asking that the record be corrected. I’m guessing (not a lawyer) that someone complaining would need to at least prove that the false record was a result of an intentional act and not an unintentional error.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.