[Michael.SF.]

I know your comment was not directed at me, but I’m going to jump in on your comment to Coloradan. I am no expert either, but I did discuss this with a family member who has experience in these matters. As an attorney he has argued three cases before the CA Supreme Court, winning two of the three. His comment regarding Durham was: ‘I gave up on him a long time ago’.

What are your thoughts on why after, (what four years?) have we seen only one indictment and that on a low level actor.

[coloradan]

I think he’s Deep State and might even be on Hillary’s payroll. It appears to me that he wants to give the appearance of pursuing justice, while the actual bad actors can be assured they will escape all charges, and even escape any scrutiny. Including many who should hang for their actions.

[reasonisfaith]

Because the task is exponentially greater than anything achieved by your family member or anyone else, ever.

This is not anything like a single case, or even the most complicated single case.

To grasp this, you have to have given some amount of consideration to the scope of the problem our country faces.

I don’t doubt that you have.