Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Finally: A Transparent Voting Process That Can't Be Corrupted, Hacked, or Cheated — Democrats Will Hate It
PJ Media ^ | 03/22/2022 | Kevin Downey Jr.

Posted on 03/22/2022 10:06:35 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

The left loves absentee voting, so I say let’s give it to them. And let’s make it as easy as picking up a scratch-off lottery ticket from the local store. Hell, let them vote on their phones. What could go wrong?

Nothing. Welcome to Redo Voting, the world’s first and only transparent, unhackable, incorruptible, paper-based voting system. No wiggle room on chain of custody, no Zuckerbucks to buy influence, and no reason to stop counting votes at 10:30 p.m. when the Republican presidential candidate is pummelling whatshisface, you know, the thing.

From the Redo Voting website:

Redo Voting is a hybrid of existing secure document technology used by state lotteries, combined with government-level encryption. The result is a voting system that is paper-based, but uses a web browser for data entry. A great example of this is your state’s lottery program. 45 states currently have a state-wide lottery, and because of the massive amounts of money that pass through that system the security is the best available this side of military encryption. If that were “hackable,” billions would be stolen on a regular basis; but it does not happen. We use the same technology and processes.

You may not yet have heard about the brilliance of Redo Voting, but it’s the latest rage in Washington, D.C. Everyone is talking about it.

You’ve heard a lot about “chain of custody” problems in the 2020 election. With Redo Voting, chain of custody is no longer an issue. It is 100% guaranteed from the printer right through exhaustion of post-election excuses. You cast your vote on a secure .gov domain website, and no one but you touches your ballot.

It can be used to vote in person or from anywhere on the planet.

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2022election; 2024election; ballotfraud; election2022; election2024; elections; onlinevoting; redovoting; security; stolenelection; voting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: CarmichaelPatriot
Re: "Would take a Constitutional Amendment to centralize it at the federal level."

Unless I misunderstand, votes are recorded at the state level...

"Your browser is then directed to a state.gov website."

The two weaknesses I see are:

(1) Registered eligible voters - how do they stop fraud in the registration process?

(2) What happens when someone fraudulently votes your name? How do you prove you have not voted yet?

21 posted on 03/22/2022 11:35:12 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: noiseman
As I think about this a little more, it looks like the proposed system is just a secure conduit, like a VPN, for transmitting voting data. It still depends upon the accuracy of state voter databases and the honesty of those voting as well as of state elections officials. Nothing about this would, for example, prevent an anonymous person from voting in the name of a dead person (where stats refuse to clean up voter rolls), or someone who moved from voting in a state in which they’re no longer eligible, or keep someone from falsely voting in someone else’s name (so long as they won the race with the actual voter to vote in their name first). I can also see it actually making voting multiple times EASIER, by making it far more quick and convenient to fraudulently vote in multiple states (we don’t have a single, unified, national voting system, but instead 51 separate ones - 50 states plus D.C.).

At best this technology would just secure and speed up one portion of the logistical pipeline, but there would still be many holes to exploit.

22 posted on 03/22/2022 11:47:30 PM PDT by noiseman (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1

Election day should be April 15th or 16th every year.

And if the IRS changes their date, it changes with them.


23 posted on 03/23/2022 12:20:38 AM PDT by SPDSHDW (You get what you let occur with no resistance. Everything Joepedo n' felons do is on your head.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

paper ballots and wide-ranging rights to transparency and integrity to enable partisan actors to enforce their own rights are the solutions

the latter worked wonders in Virginia 2021


24 posted on 03/23/2022 2:00:43 AM PDT by thoughtomator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Any Affinity bulk mail that in appearance resembles a ballot should be outlawed.


25 posted on 03/23/2022 3:00:47 AM PDT by Clutch Martin (The trouble ain't that there is too many fools, but that the lightning ain't distributed right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: noiseman

bttt


26 posted on 03/23/2022 3:03:45 AM PDT by sit-rep ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This voting system requires a web browser, therefore it’s racist. /s


27 posted on 03/23/2022 3:11:03 AM PDT by jcmccorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

When voting is closed, the secretary of State applies a decryption key to the repository and tallies the votes in seconds. She/he can give the key to anyone who wants to see the results (including voters). The tallies can’t be altered.

And there’s the weak link: the secretary of State who counts - again it isn’t the number of votes, but who counts them and how.


28 posted on 03/23/2022 3:36:27 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now its your turn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Democrats will be working overtime to find an excuse to declare it racist.


29 posted on 03/23/2022 3:36:57 AM PDT by Socon-Econ (adi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

You’d need to be able to verify that there are only bona-fide residents in the database. Auditing that would have to be a priority.


30 posted on 03/23/2022 3:46:36 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The only verification I want implemented is to dip your finger in ink after handing in your ballot.


31 posted on 03/23/2022 3:55:48 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“You get a scratch-off “ballot” (again, based on the same technology as a lottery scratch-off ticket) from any retail store, scratch it, ... “

So you can go to 20 retail stores, “get” 20 ballots, and vote 20 times. Who checks ID to determine if you’re a legal voter — the low-IQ clerk behind the counter at 7-11?


32 posted on 03/23/2022 4:07:02 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam (When government fears the people, there is liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Even when liberals vote in person they’re absentee.


33 posted on 03/23/2022 4:08:29 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Online anything is subject to hacking.


34 posted on 03/23/2022 4:10:23 AM PDT by maddog55 (The only thing systemic in America is the left's hatred of it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

So, Democrats run down and get stacks of scratch off cards.
Then they get a list of registered voters, and vote for them.

How does this process prevent vote harvesting or Zuckerberg paying for registration and peoples scratch offs?

Register in person. Bring an ID. Then vote in person.


35 posted on 03/23/2022 4:19:47 AM PDT by Pete Dovgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MAGAthon

Lindell is an insane man. He’s hurting his own cause.


36 posted on 03/23/2022 4:33:22 AM PDT by Baldwin77 (If you put anything into my body WITHOUT my consent, IT IS RAPE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

https://redovoting.com/redo-voting-faqs/

Even they have their doubts.

Q: What about the elderly who have no access to technology?

A: You raise an important question. Although Redo Voting does provide more universal and complete voter access than any election system in existence, there are some people, like the elderly with technology access challenges, who will need additional assistance.

Q: This system sounds incredible. Is there not any way to beat it?

A: Actually, there is a way. As mentioned before, Redo Voting is compatible with any voting system currently in use. If combined with a system that does not have an unbreakable, fully auditable chain of custody, however, there is the potential for someone to vote on the insecure system before voting on the Redo Voting system without being detected. For unassailably accurate, trustworthy results, use of the Redo Voting system alone is recommended.


37 posted on 03/23/2022 4:34:09 AM PDT by Pollard (PureBlood -- https://youtube.com/watch?v=VXm0fkDituE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Secure database that can not be altered? There is no such thing. Seriously.


38 posted on 03/23/2022 4:42:19 AM PDT by kjam22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Just use machines made from common components(no modems or wifi) and use Open Source software. Machine prints the ballot, voter checks it and slides it into a lock box. Votes are tallied electronically for speed but there’s a paper backup.

Tucker just the special council guy from WI on his Tucker Carlson Today show. Very eye opening, nauseating hour. Zuckerberg bought the election and had lots of helpful minions in and out of government to help. Repub state legislators were useless at best and complicit at worst.

Hopefully someone will upload it to bitchute because everyone needs to see it. Here’s the website with his reports. https://www.wielectionreview.org/


39 posted on 03/23/2022 4:42:24 AM PDT by Pollard (PureBlood -- https://youtube.com/watch?v=VXm0fkDituE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

” You cast your vote on a secure .gov domain website, and no one but you touches your ballot.”

~!~~

Who controls the database on the back end?

A pakistani IT company?


40 posted on 03/23/2022 4:47:28 AM PDT by z3n (Kakistocracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson