“The destructiveness of extreme weather is one of the biggest stories of our time.”
http://www.lerctr.org/~transit/healy/crap.wav
The answer is more flora and it’s already happening. The planet knows how to take care of itself.
Does the article explain how the change in CO2 is a lagging indicator?
did they explain why there has been very little warming?
Solar eclipse 2017: How much did the temperature change during the eclipse? (non-FR; 8.22.17)
Also, is it any surprise that nighttime temperatures typically keep dropping in various places until shortly after sunrise?
BY DAVID SCHECHTER, CHANCE HORNER, HALEY RUSH, CHRIS HACKER
With THIS MANY authors, it must be true! /S
Born in ‘61, South Dakota. I know EXTREME weather. This ain’t it.
WAKE UP!!!!
Why do people waste their lives spreading lies such as the imaginary “climate crisis”? I guess it pays well.
421 parts per million... per million... roughyl .0005% of the atmosphere...
ugh.
these people lie through omission.
A VERY subtle problem. So subtle that it cannot be detected, only believed in.
Since CO2 is soluble in water and the oceans cover a majority of the Earth's surface, the oceans sequester more CO2 than any other CO2 sink.
Because of the inverse solubility of CO2 with temperature, the colder the oceans get, the more CO2 they can absorb.
Conversely, when the oceans get warmer, they expel CO2.
Atmospheric CO2 therefore follows global temperatures, it does not cause them.
You can see the yearly global atmospheric CO2 fluctuation as the oceans warm and cool with the seasons in the NOAA graph below.
The "settled science" that CO2 causes "climate change" is therefore criminal sophistry.
I’m sure humans are affecting the global climate. I’m also sure the impact is miniscule, immeasurable and irrelevant. In fact, I would expect that our large cities and asphalt paving in modern societies around the world would affect the climate more than CO2, especially considering the miniscule amount that our contribution from energy usage adds to the already miniscule amount of CO2 that is in the atmosphere.
We are the most versatile and adaptable species ever recorded on this planet. A slow rise in temperature of 1 degree average every 100 years, is plenty of time for humans to adapt. And by the way, it hasn’t been 1 degree per year.
So, no. The weather is not getting more extreme. It just gets reported more dramatically than ever before as media outlets compete to dramatize more than their competitors to bring in viewers and clicks.
“The Invisible Problem:...”
This part is correct. It is INVISIBLE!
IT DOESN’T EVEN EXIST!
Even IF it did, there is NOTHING puny Hu-mans could do about it.
Even IF they could, what would be the unforeseen negative consequences of lets say GIANT umbrellas in the sky to block the sun?
PURE IDIOCY
(sorry, is it hu-they now?)
I'm glad that the 'science is settled,' otherwise I might be inclined to believe other experts who think that global warming will bring with it an overall lowering of our winds, making windmills less useful.
Global ‘Stilling’: Is Climate Change Slowing Down the Wind?As carbon dioxide levels rise and the Earth’s poles warm, researchers are predicting a decline in the planet’s wind speeds. This ‘stilling’ could impact wind energy production and plant growth and might even affect the Gulf Stream, which drives much of the world’s climate.
BY JIM ROBBINS • SEPTEMBER 13, 2022
“When it comes to fire, drought and floods, we spend a lot of time showing you the effects of climate change. “
They make the link, because . . . ?
-Pull it out of their Arse
-Orange Man Bad
-”Science”
just more Clown World
This is written like they haven’t been telling us CO2 is the most lethal substance in the universe for the past 40 years.
The destructiveness of extreme weather is because we have built more in extreme weather areas.
Deaths from weather are at the lowest in human history. But let’s not talk about that.
Lastly, if oceans are going to rise, why are the leading financial institutions with the highest ESG scores still funding construction on our shorelines? Shouldn’t they be worried about rising sea levels?
Invisible and objectively unprovable.
He showed data from a sensor that measured the intensity of IR at two different altitudes, one near the surface and one higher up.
There was a noticeable drop in IR measured at altitude in the two narrow bands of IR to which CO2 is opaque.
So CO2 does not, in fact, block a large band of IR, and I also thought that those bands correspond to two rather narrow temperature ranges.
So if there is little air or ground at those two narrow bands of temperatures, then CO2 has no effect.
It just made me even more skeptical, especially since even now CO2 is only 500 parts per million of the atmosphere.