REVEALED: All the Texts About the Fani Willis and Nathan Wade Relationship Between Lawyer Ashleigh Merchant and Key Witness Terrance Bradley (very interesting)

I’ve been watching her podcasts along with a couple others on YouTube
—-
https://rumble.com/c/MegynKelly

Please don’t give traffic and ad revenue to woke commie YouTube/google

This is infuriating, and depressing.

It is infuriating because the crowd around Nathan Wade and Fani Willis are filthy, disgusting liars. Anyone who has spent a nanosecond observing deceitful people will recognize every characteristic from obfuscation to outright lying in these people being cross examined.

And it is depressing, because I believe that those of us who cling desperately to the water-logged life ring that we still live in a Constitutional Republic, are going to be wrenched away from that emotional flotation device.

We are going to find out, when nothing serious happens to either Fani Willis or Nathan Wade, that our notion of a Constitutional Republic is indeed a fast fading memory.

If not gone. And I find that depressing.

When I look at these proceedings, I am reminded of a time when people were more sane, and that was in the 1950 re-trial of Alger Hiss for perjury.

In that trial, the key items of evidence were the documents from the famous Pumpkin Papers trove composed of documents obtained illegally by Alger Hiss and given to Whittaker Chambers, comrades in the same Soviet spy ring.

Those documents were purloined by Alger Hiss when he worked at the State Department, and when he took them home, he retyped them so he could return the documents before they would be missed. These were microfilmed and given to Whittaker Chambers to send back to the Soviet Union. He had kept some of them hidden as an ace in the hole to defend himself with if the Left came after him, which they did.

Whittaker Chambers gave those documents to Richard Nixon when it became apparent that the DOJ was preparing to prosecute him.

The documents Chambers gave to Nixon had been analyzed by the FBI, and the FBI found that those documents had been typed on the typewriter that Alger Hiss had in his house. Apparently, the output from a specific typewriter is very nearly a fingerprint, and a match was, in those days, very legally damaging to a defendant.

Alger Hiss was on the stand and being cross examined at the climax of his perjury trial, and the prosecutor brought up the documents, said they had been positively and definitively matched to his typewriter, and asked Alger Hiss to explain how that could happen.

Alger Hiss said: “I will never understand how Whittaker Chambers was able to get into my house and use my typewriter.” (I don’t recall the exact wording)

When Alger Hiss said this, the packed courtroom burst into guffaws, laughter, and outbursts of derision, and the Judge had to quiet the courtroom.

That was in 1950. A saner time. When people in that courtroom heard Hiss say that, they just responded viscerally, as normal people might, to a transparent and dishonest evasion from an obviously guilty man.

When I saw this Megyn Kelly video, it was clear there was no such visceral reaction. No involuntary derisive reaction to people who were obviously lying under oath. These people, engaged in one of the most heinous, anti-constitutional persecutions of innocent people, were just openly lying. And nobody seemed to care. Worse, these people seem to know they are going to get away with it. They know they might get a slap on the wrist of some kind, but they won’t be disbarred, and won’t be disgraced. And I think they will get away with it.

And I have to say-in my whole life, I can’t remember wanting to be wrong about anything more than I want to be wrong, right now, about this.

Breitbart Exclusive–Fani Willis’s Extreme DEI Training: Employees
Forced to Associate ‘White’ with ‘Bad’, Judges Ranked on Skin Color

Graphics-—(INSET: Training from Harvard’s “Project Implicit” Training) Fani Willis, the District Att David Walter Banks/Washington Post via Getty; Edit: BNN

Bi WENDELL HUSEBØ, 27 Feb 2024, breitbart.com

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis subjected her employees to mandatory race training, forcing the entire office to rate “Black” or “White” skin colors as either “Good” or “Bad,” according to training slides and video exclusively obtained by Breitbart News.

“If you didn’t participate in the quiz, you got fired,” a source exclusively told Breitbart News about Willis’s policy.

Sources who shared the race training with Breitbart News wished to remain anonymous for fear of retribution due to their direct knowledge of the “corrupt” and “hostile work environment” inside the District Attorney’s Office.

Sources described the race training as a directive straight from Willis, “[who] injected racism [into the office] from the second she got hired.” Willis won election in 2020 and is up for reelection this November. In 2021, she began probing former President Donald Trump.

Dubbed an “implicit bias test,” a Harvard website generated the “diversity, equity, and inclusion” slides that made some sources feel ashamed of being white employees.

“Willis had some guy be live for roughly eight hours,” a source said. “He was a former member of Obama’s White House.”

The training suggested the United States was founded on the sins of white men and the slaughter of native Americans, one source described. “I thought it was so wrong.”

“Willis pulled it off as diversity [training], but it was more so an attack on the race [relations] thing,” a source explained.

One element of the training described by a source was a slide test where users had to choose to move an image of a “white” person to a block that said “bad” in order to complete the program:

It had a word on the left, and it’s a box, a word on the left, a word on the right, and an image. I needed to connect the image to one side, which determines your bias. Until you said that the ‘White’ guy was ‘Bad’ it wouldn’t let you move on.

It said ‘White Bad’ on one side of ‘Black Good’ on the other and an image of a person came up and if you didn’t drag it to the “White Bad” category — the white man pops up in the middle — If you couldn’t pass the test. They put an X in it and it won’t let you move on.

snip

These people, engaged in one of the most heinous, anti-constitutional persecutions of innocent people, were just openly lying. And nobody seemed to care.

One reason:

Because many people are immersed within the lives of characters, of productions, instead of real life.

The apparent motives (credit: the script) for bad behavior, are rationalized, and separation of people from their sovereignty in such situations, is accepted.

You would know to stop somebody who is committing a violent act against a woman. Every man wears a badge.

You know your responsibility. But in contrast to years ago, too many people take a knee and bow down to socialist dogma.

Thanks

Using Rumble still kinda new to me

How did Willis, Wade and Bradley ever get a law license?

Just signed up to Rumble

Thanks for the tip

How did Willis, Wade and Bradley ever get a law license?

Didn't realize the 3 of them got and apparently now share a single law license.

Didn't realize the 3 of them got and apparently now share a single law license.

How pathetic is it when a person complains about a tiny grammatical error in the wee hours before daybreak?

Depends…has he been to Epstein’s island?

That is a good analysis. I have to agree. I have come to see the ubiquity of smart phones (and I have one too, and post on FR as well, so...I am not a Luddite) as a great danger to humanity.

The problem is as you allude to, that people are tied in all the time, everywhere, and the behavioral changes in our culture tied to that are extremely bad, IMO. I had written this:

I was one of the last people that I knew who got a cell phone. It is odd for two reasons; first, I was one of the first people in my crowd to actually get on the Internet and have a computer, and secondly, the type of job I held required me to be in phone contact with the hospital.

I held off getting a cell phone, because I was waiting until there was a device that could do all the things I wanted in one package (all the usual, music, cell phone, PDA…)

But what finally drove me to get a cell phone was the fact that payphones became almost nonexistent. It's about an 18 mile drive to work for me, and I knew where every payphone was along the way, and I do mean every single one of them, including the ones inside stores, that kind of thing. So, the cell phone has made my life much, much easier in that respect. When I get paged, I don't have to accelerate my car to get to the next payphone.

And let's face it: having a smart phone with an Internet connection is just amazing. Flashlight. Calculator. Alarm and timer. Tides. Sunrise/Sunset. GPS. Camera. Video. Web browser. You have a huge amount of human knowledge available to you. When you need to know that word, that one word that is evading you and driving you crazy, you can look it up. If you need to know an address, you can find it almost instantly. I have an application that, when I hear a bird, I can record its song and it tells me what kind of bird it is. If I need to know what that bright spot in the sky at night is, I can tell if it is Jupiter or Saturn. I am an aviation enthusiast. If a plane flies overhead, I can say "Siri, Planes overhead" and it tells me the make, model, airline, and direction of every plane within about 70 miles. If I want to see what temperature I should cook pork to, I can get that in seconds. If I want to replace some component in my car, there is almost always a video out there showing you in detail how to do it. The days of using the damned Chilton manual are gone...mostly. And so on.

I have always been a huge early adopter and technology advocate. But over the last 10-15 years, I have reluctantly concluded that I was wrong, I was enthusiastic without considering the possible negatives.

It isn't just going to breakfast at a hotel and seeing an entire family, all on their phones at the same time, nobody talking.

It isn't the obsessive practice of watching a car you pass (that is a bit too close to your lane) with your hand on the horn, seeing if the person is talking on their phone and not watching their lane.

It isn't getting together with people you haven't seen in a while, and having several of them constantly looking at their phones, or unable to stop texting.

It is the constant feeling that people just aren't there. They are somewhere else, anywhere else, and not in the moment.

My wife and I were driving home from Boston a couple of years ago, and a particular event stuck with me. It was a wonderful early spring evening, and we were crossing over the Massachusetts Turnpike at the end of Newbury Street near the Tower Records building (now defunct)

As we passed the Tower Records building, there were perhaps 30 people standing there, probably waiting for a bus. Every single one of them stood with one palm up cradling a phone, their anonymous faces reflecting the faint light of their phone as they gazed down at it. Their heads were all inclined at the same angle. They could have been mannequins. All of them nearly completely motionless in a trance-like state of immobility.

Just gazing down.

What really struck me in a sad and negative way was...it was a beautiful night. You know that time of night when the sun has gone down, and the horizon has that orange, to pink to cobalt blue gradation, and the trees, not yet bearing leaves, are starkly silhouetted in black against that beautiful sky? That time of night. To the left, the giant Citgo sign was lit up, doing its characteristic light show.

There was so much going on. So much beauty. So much life. So much happening. But these 30 people were completely and totally oblivious to it all. They saw nothing but that rectangular screen in their hand.

There was something very, very sad about that, and it has stuck with me.

I saw this cartoon some years ago titled: "If the Titanic Sank Today", and I thought it was hilarious:

In my life, I have perhaps 5 pictures of myself before the age of 10. There are people now who have pictures and video of them exiting the birth canal as they are born, all the way up to today.

There are people who I believe, have never seen anything significant with their own eyes. Everything is through the prism of a smartphone camera.

I was on an airline some time ago, and a heated discussion was taking place between a woman and a flight attendant, and all around me, there was a smartphone at the end of a hand protruding above the line of seats, each phone displaying on its visible screen to me, the drama acting out in real life. It was completely creepy.

Like the novel "Fahrenheit 451" where the guy is running through the streets to escape, seeing his picture on video screens and hearing his name and location being broadcast everywhere, as heads poke out of windows to look for him.

Not that far from reality now...actually, it already is in most respects.

I love GPS and finding the spelling of a word instantly, but...the downside of this technology in the hands of people who wish us ill is sobering.