[servo1969]

Compare the info provided by ABC in this post:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/4232996/posts

with the info provide by Legal Insurrection.

[ComputerGuy]

I find it interesting that a single juror held out for a conviction. To me, that indicates a bias going in.

[rdcbn1]

There was absolutely no evidence that George Kelly was guilty of anything. He was protecting his property against armed drug runners.

This whole prosecution was about the Federal Government showing the residents of Southern Arizona that illegal aliens are a preferred constituency who are above the law and to intimidate American citizens living on the border into not getting in the way of the illegal alien invasion and the cartel human and drug trafficking.

This was the most dishonest, bad faith prosecution I have seen in a very long time.

[Gay State Conservative]

If it’s a Rat Party DA he’ll surely be tried again.

[Organic Panic]

AND NOW Biden’s DOJ will show up for the “civil rights violation” trial.

[mykroar]

So, I assume they’ll keep trying again since the jury didn’t reach a verdict? I hope not, but I won’t hold my breath.

[Navy Patriot]

The jury voted 7-1 not guilty.

That's a good sign, this was a malicious persecution (Kangaroo Prosecution) of Kelley.

[DesertRhino]

Any details about the make up of the jury?

[DouglasKC]

Why a mistrial? Cause he didn’t like the outcome??

[Midwesterner53]

Congratulations Mr Kelly!

[ComputerGuy]

Political pressure is going to be high for the prosecution to try him again. Mehico itself has weighed in on the issue.

[sauropod]

Bkmk

[wastedyears]

The jury began deliberating April 18. After days of being unable to reach a verdict, the judge overseeing the trial declared a mistrial on Monday.

What authority does that British noble have to do that?