Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump Whodunnit: Prosecutors admit key evidence in document case has been tampered with
Just the News ^ | May 3, 2024 | John Solomon

Posted on 05/03/2024 7:40:56 PM PDT by chickenlips

In a stunning admission, Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team is admitting that key evidence in former President Donald Trump’s classified documents criminal case was altered or manipulated since it was seized by the FBI, and that prosecutors misled the court about it for a period of time.

Legal experts told Just the News the revelation could prove to be a serious problem for prosecutors and a violation of court rules to preserve evidence in the state it was seized.

In a new filing Friday, Smith’s team said that the order of documents in some of the boxes of memos that were seized by the FBI from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate was altered or jumbled, leaving two different chronologies: one that was digitally scanned and another the physical order in the boxes.

“Since the boxes were seized and stored, appropriate personnel have had access to the boxes for several reasons, including to comply with orders issued by this Court in the civil proceedings noted above, for investigative purposes, and to facilitate the defendants' review of the boxes,” Smith’s team wrote in a new court filing to U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon.

“There are some boxes where the order of items within that box is not the same as in the associated scans,” the prosecutors wrote.

Smith’s team in a footnote also conceded it had misled the court about the problem by previously declaring that the evidence had remained in the exact state it had been seized.

“The Government acknowledges that this is inconsistent with what Government counsel previously understood and represented to the Court,” the footnote said.

(Excerpt) Read more at justthenews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: documents; smith; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: thegagline

If the integrity of the evidence has been breached, I would think that the evidence has to be thrown out. Why? Because it could have been faked.


21 posted on 05/03/2024 8:54:46 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Governor Dinwiddie

why not dismissal with prejudice ?


22 posted on 05/03/2024 9:00:08 PM PDT by stylin19a (Golf is a game invented by the same people who think music comes out of a bagpipe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative
I’m waiting for Judge Cannon to dismiss the case with prejudice.

Since she was appointed by Trump, she may not want to seem "partisan" (although a Democrat judge likely would have no problem doing whatever they wanted) so she will carry on with the trial, but put up strict guardrails.

Anyway, its turning out her patience is allowing Jack Smith and the corrupt DOJ to hang themselves.

23 posted on 05/03/2024 9:25:01 PM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

I wonder if they’ll figure out a way to charge Trump with another felony for it? Would it surprise anyone if they did?


24 posted on 05/03/2024 9:28:16 PM PDT by Bullish (...And just like that, I was dropped from the ping-list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

Mistrial, lack of creditable evidence.

wy69


25 posted on 05/03/2024 9:56:31 PM PDT by whitney69 (yption tunnels)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
The winner:

#5: "why not dismissal with prejudice ?"

✩ ✩ ✩ ✩ ✩

Ding, ding, ding!

26 posted on 05/03/2024 10:14:01 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie (LORD, grant thy people grace to withstand the temptations of the world, the flesh, and the devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: All

In a stunning admission, Biden Special Counsel Jack Smith’s team admits key evidence in President Trump’s classified documents criminal case was altered or manipulated.

Biden’s FBI raided Trump’s private residence at Mar-a-Lago. Biden ordered “key evidence” seized evidence that Biden had calculatedly planted there to incriminate Trump.

Shockingly Biden prosecutors misled the court about it. Legal experts say the revelation could prove to be a serious problem for Biden prosecutors and a violation of court rules “to preserve evidence in the state it was seized.”


27 posted on 05/04/2024 12:00:11 AM PDT by Liz (This then is how we should pray: Our Father who art in heaven, Hallowed be thy name. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips
Evidence tampering by the government throws the entire case out.

O-U-T!


28 posted on 05/04/2024 12:12:53 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Leftniks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips
In a sane world, this case would have been thrown out already. It strongly stinks of political persecution against their biggest opponent, lawless lawfare, and election interference.

In a sane world those who engaged in this activity would have been voted out of office, suffered massive electoral loss, unemployed, and probably criminally prosecuted, and quite discredited.

However, the highly corrupt democrats are quite confident that none of this will happen so they continue on. A lot of the republicans are also corrupt, so they silently support these efforts, and if there is any opposition they help to quash that opposition.

So the corruption festers and grows and we are fast becoming like countries like India where such political persecution and targeting and corruption is part of life.

29 posted on 05/04/2024 1:12:27 AM PDT by Moorings
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

“Legal experts told Just the News the revelation could prove to be a serious problem for prosecutors and a violation of court rules to preserve evidence in the state it was seized.“

NOTHING is a serious problem for people who are ignoring Law and Precedent all along the way. Getting a jury to back it all up one hundred percent is no prob either.


30 posted on 05/04/2024 4:46:38 AM PDT by TalBlack (I We have a Christian duty and a patriotic duty. God help us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TalBlack

They are ignoring law and order. Order is especially relevant in court proceedings.


31 posted on 05/04/2024 4:59:36 AM PDT by Lisbon1940 (I don’t see why they would)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lisbon1940

This is a perfect method to remove or insert evidence. Create as much chaos as possible to cover the trail.

EC


32 posted on 05/04/2024 5:09:32 AM PDT by Ex-Con777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chickenlips

CHAIN OF EVIDENCE DOESN’T EXIST


33 posted on 05/04/2024 7:36:17 AM PDT by ridesthemiles (not giving up on TRUMP---EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flaming Conservative

“I’m waiting for Judge Cannon to dismiss the case with prejudice. Please God, make it so!”


Given the information that has come to light over the past couple of weeks, I’m beginning to think she will dismiss the case. Every day something new is revealed that supports such an action.


34 posted on 05/04/2024 9:22:11 AM PDT by CFW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Yep.... just like ballots.


35 posted on 05/04/2024 9:30:42 AM PDT by LastDayz (A blunt and brazen Texan. I will not be assimilated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
How about “Dismissed with prejudice?”

That would be glorious! However, I think that there may be something less severe like an irrebuttable presumption and jury instruction (if need be) that Trump etc
1)never accessed the documents; and ,
2) did not know that there were classified materials in the boxes

With these finding, the defense could then file motion(s) to dismiss.

36 posted on 05/04/2024 11:46:07 AM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: thegagline
They forced him to take the documents by dumping them on the White House driveway. Isn't that an admission they were his?


37 posted on 05/04/2024 12:03:08 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: CFW

Let them dig a little more. Take time off the clock. Trump is sure to get a square deal with this judge. Milk it.


38 posted on 05/04/2024 12:19:42 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum
I'm going to give you a lawyer answer: yes and no.

I defended a case where my client received a large amount of cocaine by the US mail. The shipping box had his address but not his name. The whole case came down to intent, dominion and control. The idiot cops were tipped off by the Feds that there was a box of drugs headed to my client's address, so the cops raided my client's house immediately after he took the box inside. They didn't wait for him to open the box and do something with the contents like cutting the coke and repackaging it. I argued that the Commonwealth could not show that my client had the intent to engage in possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance because 1) the box wasn't addressed to him; 2)he never exercised dominion and control of the contents etc. I went as far as saying if the Court ruled against my client it would be a clarion call to all to send boxes of contraband to unwitting enemies with the intent of having them arrested. The Court itself would not be immune from being a victim. Case dismissed.

Depending upon what Trump and his agents did prior to and after receipt of the boxes, the aforesaid scenario could play out favorably for Trump.

39 posted on 05/04/2024 12:29:01 PM PDT by thegagline (Sic semper tyrannis! Goldwater & Thomas Sowell in 2024)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: thegagline

This was not an anonymous delivery. This was NARA dumping the documents on Trump and forcing him to take possession. Now NARA wants to claim Trump has illegal possession of said documents?

On what planet did anything Trump did constitute a crime, never mind that the President decides what is classified and not some administrative state bureaucrat?


40 posted on 05/04/2024 12:40:17 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (The worst thing about censorship is █████ ██ ████ ████ ████ █ ███████ ████. FJB.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson