And you remind me of one of those people who resort to personal attacks when they lose an argument.
The scientific survey you reference lumps threats and homicides together. If you know of a way to objectively compare that with the Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers which only address occupational fatalities, please enlighten me.
U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Fatalities per 100,000 Year 1999 |
|
Commercial Fishermen | 162 |
Timber Cutters | 154 |
Air Pilots | 65 |
Construction Laborers | 37 |
Garbage Collectors | 34 |
Truck Drivers | 28 |
Electricians | 12 |
Gardeners (non farm) | 11 |
Police | 11 |
Carpenters | 7 |
The Bureau of Labor Statistics data displayed shows the relative danger of on-the-job fatalities for a number of occupations. The data shows that a garbage collector has a three times better chance of "not coming home to his family" in the line of duty than a police officer.
Can you refute that statistic?
Total Crimes Known: 11,635,100
Violent Crime: 1,430,690
Property Crime: 10,204,500
Murder: 15,530
Rape: 89,110
Robbery: 409,670
Assault: 916,380
Burglary: 2,099,700
Theft: 6,957,400
Motor Vehicle Theft: 1,147,300
Now, of the 11,635,100 or so crimes committed, how many of those were against LEOs and how many were committed against private citizens? I would suggest that the people, not the cops, have a much more dangerous need for firearms.