Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC did not tell police about bin Laden caller in London
Electronic Telegraph ^ | 3 November 2001 | Sean O'Neill

Posted on 11/02/2001 4:49:10 PM PST by aculeus

THE BBC did not inform police of a telephone call it received from a London representative of Osama bin Laden's al-Qa'eda terrorist network.

The corporation's Arabic Service took the call on Thursday morning minutes before it was faxed a copy of bin Laden's most recent statement urging Pakistani Muslims to overthrow President Musharraf.

The caller, speaking in Arabic with a marked Pakistani or Afghani accent, said he represented bin Laden and wanted to send a statement to the BBC World Service.

Although he said he was calling from outside Britain, a digital display on the telephone in the office where the call was taken revealed that it came from a London number.

Details of the contact - which suggest that an al-Qa'eda cell may be active in London - were not reported to the anti-terrorist branch, which is hunting bin Laden associates in Britain. BBC insiders said that they feared the number of the anonymous caller, who reporters tried without success to ring back, had been lost.

Scotland Yard is unhappy that it was not notified about the call. Anti-terrorist squad officers are now examining the matter but it is feared that their chances of tracing the caller have been lost because of the delay.

A police source said: "Distributing statements on behalf of terrorists is an offence. We would like to have been informed." Al-Qa'eda has used London as a base for disseminating its propaganda before.

Between 1996 and 1998 an organisation named the Advice and Reformation Committee, based in west London, is alleged to have acted as a media office for bin Laden.

It distributed his declaration of a jihad against the United States and al-Qa'eda's admission of responsibility for the August 1998 east Africa embassy bombings.

Khalid al Fawwaz, Ibrahim Eidarous and Adel Abdel Bary, who worked for the ARC and are alleged to have been members of al-Qa'eda, are all in custody in Britain fighting extradition to America in connection with the embassy bombings plot.

But police believe that other members of the al-Qa'eda cell which was operational in London in the 1990s evaded arrest and could still be in Britain. Thursday's call was made at around 8.30am - some time after news of the bin Laden letter had first been broadcast by al-Jazeera, the Qatar television channel.

The caller refused to disclose his identity and turned down requests for an interview but talked to reporters for some minutes. A BBC insider said: "He said he was a representative of Osama bin Laden and he had a fax he would send to us."

"We believe he was calling from London. This is the first time we have received a statement from bin Laden." Reporters noted the London number which had appeared on the telephone display and tried calling it but got no reply.

They checked the number with the BT operator who told them it was "operational". Several minutes after the telephone call the bin Laden statement - describing the war on terrorism as a conflict between Christianity and Islam - arrived by fax.

The fax header stated that the document was "From Taliban" and carried a six-figure number but no code. It was timed at 1.29pm - the time difference suggesting transmission from Pakistan or Afghanistan.

A spokesman for the BBC World Service said the telephone call had not been reported because Scotland Yard had not requested any information about it.

A spokesman said: "The caller claimed he was a bin Laden representative but we cannot say definitively that he was. Like any news organisation we don't ring the police as a matter of course."

The BBC said last night it believed the call came from abroad. The spokesman said the number seen on the phone may have been garbled if the call originated overseas.

Earlier, the BBC News website said the call was made in London, though this suggestion was later removed.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 11/02/2001 4:49:10 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Change USA to UK, please


2 posted on 11/02/2001 4:54:26 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus; harpseal; Travis McGee; Victoria Delsoul; Spirit Of Truth; Manny Festo...
Dumbfounded bump


3 posted on 11/02/2001 5:00:33 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Ironic that fools such as the BBC, CNN, et al who try so hard to be so fair, objective, and non-judgmental in dealing with these vicious terrorists would be among the very first to be disposed of were the ones they're being so careful not to offend or betray ever got the power they seek - ironic, but somehow sort of satisfying...
4 posted on 11/02/2001 5:06:42 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ
Let's assume that, instead, BBC had gotten a call from a skin head group asking white folks to rise up and slay all the wogs in Britain. Can anyone doubt that the Yard would have been called in immediately?
5 posted on 11/02/2001 5:11:09 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Let's assume that, instead, BBC had gotten a call from a skin head group asking white folks to rise up and slay all the wogs in Britain. Can anyone doubt that the Yard would have been called in immediately?

BBC is worse because it is paid for by taxpayers.

6 posted on 11/02/2001 5:45:25 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan; tonycavanagh
Is this a big story on your side of the pond?
7 posted on 11/02/2001 6:47:59 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Lucky
Let's assume that, instead, BBC had gotten a call from a skin head group asking white folks to rise up and slay all the wogs in Britain. Can anyone doubt that the Yard would have been called in immediately?...not me, for sure...
8 posted on 11/02/2001 8:31:39 PM PST by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
A spokesman said: "The caller claimed he was a bin Laden representative but we cannot say definitively that he was. Like any news organisation we don't ring the police as a matter of course."

9 posted on 11/02/2001 9:05:48 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
Details of the contact - which suggest that an al-Qa'eda cell may be active in London - were not reported to the anti-terrorist branch, which is hunting bin Laden associates in Britain. BBC insiders said that they feared the number of the anonymous caller, who reporters tried without success to ring back, had been lost.

This criminally irresponsible lack of notification demonstrates the BBC's obvious bias towards protecting Bin Laden and the al-Qa'eda Group--ostensibly to keep open a news source.

Should a terrorist action now be perpetrated by a London terrorist cell, the British Broadcasting Company will have to bear some of the responsibilty in the deaths and injuries that may occur.

This was conscious, pre-meditated neglect on the part of the British media administrators.

The BBC has placed itself beneath contempt.

10 posted on 11/02/2001 9:22:09 PM PST by henbane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
BTTT
11 posted on 11/02/2001 9:49:13 PM PST by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I saw this posting too late. Unfortunately I posted the same thing....oops!
12 posted on 11/02/2001 9:54:15 PM PST by janus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
I wonder if they would extend the same courtesy to, say, a neo-nazi Euro-trash group...
13 posted on 11/02/2001 9:58:04 PM PST by xm177e2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
"Distributing statements on behalf of terrorists is an offence."

Then arrest the people responsible for the crime.

"Like any news organisation we don't ring the police as a matter of course."

Then you should be in jail. I don't know what we can do if the British government isn't willing to throw the book at these cretins.

14 posted on 11/02/2001 10:03:55 PM PST by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MadIvan
You are right about the BBC. I guess we know which side they favor! CNN has a twin after all.
15 posted on 11/02/2001 10:08:34 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: henbane
This criminally irresponsible lack of notification demonstrates the BBC's obvious bias towards protecting Bin Laden and the al-Qa'eda Group--ostensibly to keep open a news source.

Whats worse, is that it is all profit motivated, at least it is with CNN. Without an OJ trial or Desert Storm or OBL, nobody watches the darn station. It really has nothing to do with keeping neutrality. It has everything to do with prolonging the coverage (ergo the revenue), IMHO....

16 posted on 11/02/2001 10:23:51 PM PST by Go Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: janus
I saw this posting too late. Unfortunately I posted the same thing....oops!

BTTT.

17 posted on 11/03/2001 5:37:24 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
A good grief! bump.
18 posted on 11/03/2001 10:00:55 AM PST by patent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: patent; janus; aculeus; Go Gordon; henbane; JeanS; Intolerant in NJ; Mr. Lucky


The flag reads: "There is no God but God and Mohammed is the messenger of God."

Muhammad said: "If you see the black flags coming from Khurasan (Afghanistan),
join that army, even if you have to crawl over ice,
for that is the army of the Imam al-Mahdi
and no one can stop that army until it reaches Jerusalem."

   Black Flags of Islam  

Portents of the Imam al-Mahdi, the Moslems' prophesied deliverer of Jerusalem?

Click on the Black Flags for the link


19 posted on 11/03/2001 10:29:05 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: aculeus
GB deserves better than these hopeless idiots.
20 posted on 11/03/2001 2:34:08 PM PST by dighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson