Posted on 11/06/2001 7:44:10 PM PST by Pokey78
WASHINGTON -- It's not easy to demonize a demon. But President Bush is trying.
The Evil One is getting eviler and eviler.
Al Qaeda terrorists, Mr. Bush said yesterday, speaking by satellite to an audience of European leaders gathered in Warsaw, "are seeking chemical, biological and nuclear weapons. Given the means, our enemies would be a threat to every nation, and eventually to civilization itself."
It's been known for years that Osama bin Laden wanted to go nuclear. So why would the president gild the plutonium lily by invoking a nuclear threat now, when Americans are already wincing and flinching their way through life? Why put fangs on a vampire?
It reminded me of the first Bush team's hyperventilating attempt to convince Americans that we should go to war with Iraq over Kuwait, which ranged from Bush senior comparing Saddam to Hitler to James Baker justifying it on economic grounds: "Jobs, jobs, jobs."
But this time everybody's on board with the goal, even if some allies and segments of the European public are concerned about tactics.
The allied governments agree that bin Laden needs to be taken out. And Europeans have pressed their combat troops on a reluctant Bush administration, which had mistakenly preferred the flexibility of a more unilateral approach but is now giving in to British pleas for a more multilateral one.
The Evil One's latest video was a flop in this country. TV pretty much ignored it, newspapers buried it, and reporters had to go to the C.I.A. or to London or India to even find a complete translated text. In a way, the White House was hoist on its own censorship petard because Osama's ranting insults of the U.N. and Muslims who support America could well have worked against him had the video gotten wider play.
The president should not have to pump up his case with ominous threats in the future. He can simply point to the past. The rubble is still smoking in New York. He should put down the bullhorn and tell Rummy to get moving.
Mr. Bush may have wanted to turn up the volume on Osama again to divert attention from law enforcement failures to get any break in the anthrax and hijacking cases.
When he attacked the U.S., bin Laden unleashed several American phobias: The yuppie fear of germs. The boomer fear of not living up to the greatest generation. And the post-Vietnam fear of risking ground troops in unfamiliar and harsh terrain.
But we will have to come to grips with that last fear if we want to make good on our promise to rid the world of Al Qaeda.
Right now we are using beards as beards, trying to prop up the Northern Alliance and hoping that somehow a Southern Alliance will materialize like a genie from Aladdin's lamp.
But the stories about the lame rebel force with its wooden saddles and line of old Russian tanks get sillier and sillier, like scenes out of the Marx Brothers or Woody Allen's "Bananas."
TV footage shows troops practicing taking hills, and confused about whether they are supposed to advance or retreat after they win a battle with the Taliban.
We've been trying to use the Northern Alliance to lure the Taliban out of holes so we can drop 15,000-pound Daisy Cutter bombs on them. These proxies, who smoke and complain more than they fight, can help. But they are not the key to victory.
Our military plan has been too much of a political plan. So far we have been trying to do it on the cheap, with minimal risk, putting off the prospect of ground forces until the last possible moment.
If we really believe that Osama represents a potential nuclear threat to civilized Western life, as Mr. Bush said yesterday, we better be prepared to put our forces where our rhetoric is instead of waiting patiently with a fingers-crossed strategy.
But right now our leaders do not seem to be sure if they are prepared to wait months or years. The Air Force has a bomb it can steer horizontally from an F-15E into the mouth of a cave, but we are not likely to get bin Laden that way.
So keep on bombing. Keep bribing feudal chieftains. Get the allies involved and let the Northern Alliance do what it can. But let's not kid ourselves.
Give war a chance. But if it does not work, let's cut the chitchat and go get the rat.
?
Too late at night and too tired to completely go after Mo (I'll eagerly hit this thread in the early a.m. to read the writing of my fellow FReepers)...BUT, wasn't part of the reason most media outlets (Clinton News Network not withstanding) didn't play the OBL interview was the fear of hidden instructions in his rantings to his devoted followers in the hidden cells. Wasn't the concern, Mo, NOT to HELP OBL cause more carnage?
I have to ask, don't they ever proof/edit their copy before publication? Or was Mo just too eager to pounce on GWB's statements of today?
ROTFLOL
Can't you just see the mental picture of Mo (ala Dan Rather) reporting from behind the lines. I wonder if Donna Karan designs burqas?</FONT?
Maybe because they are much closer to this capability than before. Maybe because he has our attention and action is more necessary than before.
But he is moving. What, is it time to start bombing civilians?
It's true.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.