Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dowd: Talkin' Ain't Fightin'
The New York Times ^ | 11/07/2001 | maureen dowd

Posted on 11/06/2001 7:44:10 PM PST by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2001 7:44:10 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Funny, the only thing Dowd has done all her life is talk...and now she's offering advice on fighting...by talking some more.
2 posted on 11/06/2001 7:47:00 PM PST by CWOJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
LOL! Is this for real? Dowd thinks she's Patton re-incarnated.
3 posted on 11/06/2001 7:48:34 PM PST by StockAyatollah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CWOJackson
I'm pretty sure that almost no one will confuse Maureen Dowd for Condi Rice.
4 posted on 11/06/2001 7:49:54 PM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why do we need Sec'y Rumsfield when we have dopey dowd. We can have her run the war as she is so well informed. First we have the press tell us what Rumsfield is doing wrong, now we have a liberal funny page writer telling him what he is doing wrong. This is more than I can stand.
5 posted on 11/06/2001 7:56:44 PM PST by esmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I predict a post about either Michael Douglas or Catherine Zeta Jones by post 11.
6 posted on 11/06/2001 7:56:50 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Why does Maureen Dowd want to be...

?

7 posted on 11/06/2001 7:56:59 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
In a way, the White House was hoist on its own censorship petard because Osama's ranting insults of the U.N. and Muslims who support America could well have worked against him had the video gotten wider play.

Too late at night and too tired to completely go after Mo (I'll eagerly hit this thread in the early a.m. to read the writing of my fellow FReepers)...BUT, wasn't part of the reason most media outlets (Clinton News Network not withstanding) didn't play the OBL interview was the fear of hidden instructions in his rantings to his devoted followers in the hidden cells. Wasn't the concern, Mo, NOT to HELP OBL cause more carnage?

I have to ask, don't they ever proof/edit their copy before publication? Or was Mo just too eager to pounce on GWB's statements of today?

8 posted on 11/06/2001 7:57:34 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Ha! I was thinking #19.
9 posted on 11/06/2001 8:00:32 PM PST by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The New York Times, always looking for some way to bash President Bush and the US,
has now sent out General Dowd to tell the military what to do.

ROTFLOL

10 posted on 11/06/2001 8:01:42 PM PST by Diogenesis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: esmith
Maybe if we dress her up like a war correspondant and drop her into Kabul so she can report first hand. What a dumb broad.
11 posted on 11/06/2001 8:02:17 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This represents Maureen's annual token "I'm really a patriot at heart" column.
12 posted on 11/06/2001 8:04:33 PM PST by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RobbyS
Maybe if we dress her up like a war correspondant and drop her into Kabul so she can report first hand. What a dumb broad.

Can't you just see the mental picture of Mo (ala Dan Rather) reporting from behind the lines. I wonder if Donna Karan designs burqas?</FONT?

13 posted on 11/06/2001 8:10:30 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
To paraphrase something once said to me in my youth ( justly ): She talks like a woman with a paper a$$hole.
14 posted on 11/06/2001 8:10:34 PM PST by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PennsylvaniaMom
Ooops. Closing tags.
15 posted on 11/06/2001 8:11:56 PM PST by PennsylvaniaMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
It's been known for years that Osama bin Laden wanted to go nuclear. So why would the president gild the plutonium lily by invoking a nuclear threat now, when Americans are already wincing and flinching their way through life? Why put fangs on a vampire?

Maybe because they are much closer to this capability than before. Maybe because he has our attention and action is more necessary than before.

16 posted on 11/06/2001 8:15:41 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
The president should not have to pump up his case with ominous threats in the future. He can simply point to the past. The rubble is still smoking in New York. He should put down the bullhorn and tell Rummy to get moving.

But he is moving. What, is it time to start bombing civilians?

17 posted on 11/06/2001 8:20:18 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
This penetrating analysis shows that Dowd's time on the Joint Chief's staff was well spent.
18 posted on 11/06/2001 8:20:28 PM PST by 185JHP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ikka
Osama reminds her of Michael Douglas and the war is symbolic of her struggle with Catherine Zeta Jones for his affections. (Do I win anything?)
19 posted on 11/06/2001 8:21:44 PM PST by centexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
The New York Times, always looking for some way to bash President Bush and the US, has now sent out General Dowd to tell the military what to do.

It's true.

20 posted on 11/06/2001 8:23:16 PM PST by Concentrate
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson