Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POX AMERICANA -- The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775 - 82
IMdiversity.com ^ | October, 2001 | Elizabeth Fenn

Posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:21 PM PST by Sabertooth

The following is a review of Pox Americana by the Native American Village Staff…

During the years when the Revolutionary War transformed thirteen former British colonies into a new nation, a horrifying epidemic of smallpox was transforming -- or ending -- the lives of tens of thousands of people across the American continent. This great pestilence easily surpassed the war in terms of deaths, yet because of our understandable preoccupation with the Revolution and its aftermath, it has remained virtually unknown to us. Elizabeth A. Fenn is the first historian to reveal how deeply Variola affected the outcome of the War of Independence, and why it caused a continental epidemic, affecting the lives of virtually everyone in North America from Florida to Alaska.

Political ferment and military actions helped to spark the initial outbreaks of the dreaded illness on the East Coast, where the pox struck first in Boston. As the contagion of liberty spread, this gruesome contagion of pestilence spread with it, striking Native Americans, Continental soldiers, and settlers of both European and African descent. Smallpox devastated the American troops in Quebec and kept them at bay during the British occupation of Boston. Soon the disease affected the war in Virginia, where it ravaged slaves who had escaped to join the British forces. And during the terrible winter at Valley Forge, General Washington had to decide if and when to attempt the risky inoculation of his troops.

In 1779, while Creeks and Cherokees were dying in Georgia, the pox broke out in Mexico City, whence it followed travelers north, striking Texas and then erupting in Santa Fe and outlying pueblos in January 1781. From there the epidemic ravaged the northern plains and wrought havoc among the Indians trading furs at the Hudson Bay. Simultaneously, it reached the Pacific coast and extended to what is now southeastern Alaska. Fenn argues persuasively that not only the war but the expansion of the European world economy -- and with it the acquisition of the horse by plains Indians; the increase in intertribal conflict aggravated by access to guns; the trade in furs and other goods; the Spanish pattern of colonization, missionization, and silver mining -- created the circumstances for this unprecedented continental epidemic.

The destructive, desolating power of smallpox made for a cascade of public-health crises and heart-breaking human drama. Fenn explores the many different ways this megatragedy was met, and analyzes the consequences. Her brilliant book is a signal contribution to the study of infectious diseases which immensely increases our understanding of the interplay between devastating pestilence and historical change. And it transforms our picture of the American Revolution.

Author Elizabeth A. Fenn teaches history at George Washington University. The coauthor of Natives and Newcomers, she lives in Hillsborough, North Carolina. Reviews

"After the flood of works that talented scholars have devoted in recent years to the American Revolution, who could have expected a major new study of an unexamined and scarcely suspected dimension of it? That is what Elizabeth Fenn has produced in this extraordinary book, which concerns the workings of a catastrophic epidemic that shaped the course of the Revolutionary War and the way people lived throughout the North American continent."
--Edmund S. Morgan, Yale University

"I thought the most important participants in the saga of North America in the era of the American Revolution were the Native Americans, African Americans, Patriots, Redcoats, and French. Elizabeth Fenn convinces me that I must add the smallpox virus to the list of protagonists or fail to comprehend the actions of all the others."
--Alfred W. Crosby, Author of The Columbian Exchange

"With impressive research and sparkling prose, Elizabeth Fenn addresses a greatly neglected subject: a smallpox epidemic that not only was continent-wide but had the real possibility of derailing the War of Independence. Pox Americana is an excellent book."
--Don Higginbotham, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill


The following is an excerpt from the book Pox Americana: The Great Smallpox Epidemic of 1775 - 82
By Elizabeth A. Fenn

1

VARIOLA

September 28, 1751. Time has left the early pages of his diary so damaged that the exact date remains uncertain. But it was probably on this day that nineteen-year-old George Washington set sail from Virginia to the island of Barbados with his older half brother, Lawrence. If their departure date is unclear, the brothers' purpose is not: The trip was intended to ease Lawrence's persistent cough and congested lungs, symptoms of the consumption that was to kill him within a year. In the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, travel abroad was a favored treatment for consumption, the contagious disease that today we call tuberculosis. Early Americans understood consumption to be an ailment of heredity and climate, alleviated by salt air, mountain breezes, or whatever atmospheric conditions best suited a particular patient's constitution. It was the Washingtons' hope that Barbados would suit Lawrence.

The trip was difficult. Hurricanes regularly strafe the Caribbean in the early fall, and 1751 was no exception. The brothers and their shipmates endured a week of stiff gales, rain squalls, and high seas in late October, the effects of a nearby storm. They disembarked at Bridgetown, Barbados, on November 2, 1751. Although the purpose of the journey was to ease Lawrence's consumption, it was soon George who lay seriously ill -- not from tuberculosis, but from smallpox.

On November 3, the day after landing, the two brothers begrudgingly accepted an invitation to dine at the home of Gedney Clarke, a prominent merchant, planter, and slave trader with family ties to the Washingtons. "We went, -- myself with some reluctance, as the smallpox was in his family," George wrote in his diary. His misgivings were justified. For a fortnight afterward, the two Americans plied the Barbadian social circuit, unaware of the virus silently multiplying in George's body. Then, on November 17, when the incubation period had passed, the infection hit hard. "Was strongly attacked with the small Pox," Washington wrote. Thereafter, his journal entries stop. Not until December 12, when he was well enough to go out once again, did George Washington return to his diary.

The brothers' stay in Barbados was brief. "This climate has not afforded the relief I expected from it," wrote Lawrence. On December 22, the brothers parted ways, George returning to Virginia and Lawrence opting for the more promising climate of Bermuda. Lawrence's health was failing fast. He spent the spring in Bermuda and then hurried desperately to his home at Mount Vernon, Virginia, where tuberculosis took his life on July 26, 1752.

On Sunday, July 2, 1775, a much-older George Washington stepped out of a carriage in Cambridge, Massachusetts, to take command of the Continental army, newly established by the Congress still meeting in Philadelphia. Already, an American siege of nearby Boston was under way. The standoff was the outcome of the battles of Lexington and Concord in April 1775, when an angry throng of New England militiamen had routed a column of British troops attempting to seize a stash of munitions at Concord. Exhausted and humiliated, the king's soldiers had staggered sixteen miles back to Boston under relentless American sniper fire. Here they were trapped. The armed patriots were to besiege them in the city for the next eleven months.

By the time Washington arrived to command the American army in July, the confrontation had taken on an added dimension: It was not just military but medical as well. Smallpox was spreading through Boston. Washington knew how debilitating the disease could be, and he knew that the New Englanders who formed the core of his Boston-based army were among those most likely to be vulnerable. It was a vulnerability they shared with a great many others in late-eighteenth-century North America.

When smallpox struck George Washington in Barbados in 1751, his diary entries stopped for twenty-four days. If this was not inevitable, it was nevertheless predictable. Rare was the diarist who kept writing through the throes of the smallpox. The void in Washington's diary is thus telling; its very silence speaks of a misery commonplace in years gone by but unfamiliar to the world today.

Although the route of infection is impossible to determine, it is most likely that Washington picked up Variola through direct contact with a sick member of the Gedney Clarke household. The contagious party may have been Mrs. Clarke herself, who was "much indisposed" at the time of the brothers' visit. If Washington had a face-to-face meeting with her, he might have inhaled tiny infectious droplets or his hands might have carried the contagion to his mouth or nose. Such an encounter is the most likely mode of infection, but it is by no means the only one possible. Even scabs and dried-out body secretions can transmit smallpox. If someone had recently swept the floors or changed the bedclothes in a sickroom in the Clarke home, desiccated but dangerous particles may have circulated aloft. Finally, one last form of transmission bears mentioning. Variola can survive for weeks outside the human body. Carefully stored, it retains its virulence for years. Thus it is conceivable that George Washington caught smallpox from an inanimate object (often cloth or clothing) contaminated with the virus.

How do we know that Washington caught smallpox in the Clarke household? The acknowledged presence of the disease there is one clue. Timing is another. The incubation period for smallpox usually ranges from ten to fourteen days. A twelve-day incubation is most common, with the first symptoms appearing thirteen days after exposure. George Washington's case was thus fairly typical. He dined at the Clarke home on November 3, and according to his diary, his first symptoms appeared fourteen days later.

We have no firsthand description of Washington's bout with the pox. But to judge by the experience of other victims, his early symptoms would have resembled a very nasty case of the flu. Headache, backache, fever, vomiting, and general malaise all are among the initial signs of infection. The headache can be splitting; the backache, excruciating. Lakota (Sioux) Indian representations of smallpox often use a spiral symbol to illustrate intense pain in the midsection. Anxiety is another symptom. Fretful, overwrought patients often die within days, never even developing the distinctive rash identified with the disease. Twentieth-century studies indicate that such hard-to-diagnose cases are rare. But eyewitness accounts suggest that in historical epidemics, this deadly form of smallpox may have been more common among Native Americans, who frequently died before the telltale skin eruptions appeared.

To judge by the outcome of his illness, George Washington's "pre-eruptive" symptoms were not nearly so grave. The fever usually abates after the first day or two, and many patients rally briefly. Some may be footed into thinking they have indeed had a mere bout of the flu. But the respite is deceptive, for relief is fleeting. By the fourth day of symptoms, the fever creeps upward again, and the first smallpox sores appear in the mouth, throat, and nasal passages. At this point, the patient is contagious. Susceptible individuals risk their lives if they come near.

The rash now moves quickly. Over a twenty-four-hour period, it extends itself from the mucous membranes to the surface of the skin. On some, it turns inward, hemorrhaging subcutaneously. These victims die early, bleeding from the gums, eyes, nose, and other orifices. In most cases, however, the rash turns outward, covering the victim in raised pustules that concentrate in precisely the places where they will cause the most physical pain and psychological anguish: The soles of the feet, the palms of the hands, the face, forearms, neck, and back are focal points of the eruption. Elsewhere, the distribution is lighter.

If the pustules remain discrete -- if they do not run together -- the prognosis is good. But if they converge upon one another in a single oozing mass, it is not. This is called confluent smallpox, and patients who develop it stand at least a 60 percent chance of dying. For some, as the rash progresses in the mouth and throat, drinking becomes difficult, and dehydration follows. Often, an odor peculiar to smallpox develops. "The small-pox pustules begin to crack run and smell," wrote a Boston physician in 1722. A missionary in Brazil described a "pox so loathsome and evil-smelling that none could stand the great stench" of its victims. Patients at this stage of the disease can be hard to recognize. If damage to the eyes occurs, it begins now. Secondary bacterial infections can also set in, with consequences fully as severe as those of the smallpox.

Scabs start to form after two weeks of suffering, but this does little to end the patient's ordeal. In confluent or semiconfluent cases of the disease, scabbing can encrust most of the body, making any movement excruciating. The Puritan leader William Bradford described this condition among the Narragansett Indians in 1634: "They lye on their hard matts, the poxe breaking and mattering, and runing one into another, their skin cleaving (by reason therof) to the matts they lye on; when they turne them, a whole side will flea of[f] at once." An earlier report from Brazil told of "pox that were so rotten and poisonous that the flesh fell off" the victims "in pieces full of evil-smelling beasties."

Death when it occurs, usually comes after ten to sixteen days of suffering. Thereafter, the risk drops significantly as fever subsides and unsightly scars replace scabs and postules.

*Endnotes were omitted

Copyright © 2001 Elizabeth A. Fenn

E-mail: elizfenn@gwu.edu


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
I heard the author, Elizabeth Fenn, on Michael Medved's show yesterday. Among other interesting tid-bits: The absence of documentation that the spreading of smallpox to Indians by infected blankets by the United States. She found some evidence that such a plan was considered by the French in 1763, but there's no way of proving that caused the ensuing outbreak. There is apparently another incidence where som settlers might have attempted this.

The worst outbreaks among the Indians occured in the 16th and 17th Centuries, when they were first exposed to smallpox.


1 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:21 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick; vikingchick; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; Victoria Delsoul; proud2bRC...
growl!


2 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:21 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
New England is dotted with tiny smallpox cemetaries, often consisting of only one or two individuals. many of these are not maintained and unrecorded. I helped record one in the late 70's. Mr/Mrs and two kids. all dead. cemetary was adjacent to a hayfield.
3 posted on 11/16/2001 1:25:22 PM PST by camle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Hopefully, this time, beekeeper will not slap my hand...

....Some readers question whether smallpox can be spread by such methods as infected blankets. There is a smallpox virus Variola minor that is transmitted by inhalation, communicable for 3-7 days. There is a smallpox virus Variola major that is transmitted by inhalation and by contamination; it is communicable by the former method for 9-14 days and by the latter method for several years in a dried state.

See Ann F. Ramenofsky, Vectors of Death: The Archaeology of European Contact (Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press, 1987):

Among Class I agents, Variola major holds a unique position. Although the virus is most frequently transmitted through droplet infection, it can survive for a number of years outside human hosts in a dried state (Downie 1967; Upham 1986). As a consequence, Variola major can be transmitted through contaminated articles such as clothing or blankets (Dixon 1962). In the nineteenth century, the U.S. Army sent contaminated blankets to Native Americans, especially Plains groups, to control the Indian problem (Stearn and Stearn 1945). [p. 148]

See also Robert L. O'Connell, Of Arms and Men: A History of War, Weapons, and Aggression (NY and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989):

Marking a milestone of sorts, certain colonists during the French and Indian Wars resorted to trading smallpox-contaminated blankets to local tribes with immediate and devastating results. While infected carcasses had long been catapulted into besieged cities, this seems to be the first time a known weakness in the immunity structure of an adversary population was deliberately exploited with a weapons response. [p. 171]

The source:http://www.nativeweb.org/pages/legal/amherst/lord_jeff.html

4 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:56 PM PST by monsterbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
While I can not at this time cite it I believe there are references in a letter of Lord Jeffery Amherst to one of his gennerals that the Indians of the Great Lakes region should be given the blankets from smallpox victims as a mean of subduing the tribes. I can not at this time prove it was done not can I disprove that but ut is an interesting question.

Stay well - stay safe - stay armed - Yorktown

5 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:57 PM PST by harpseal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monsterbunny
Thanks for the link. Based on what I saw there, while it seems that my recollection of the nationality (they were English, though I incorrectly stated them as French) of the authors of the smallpox letters in question was incorrect, I had the year right, 1763, during the French and Indian War.

Your link seems to confirm what I heard Fenn say yesterday: that the documented evidence for widespsread deliberate contamination of Indians by infect blankets, is lacking.


6 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:57 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: harpseal
See posts #4 and #6. My claim at the top was an inadvertant and minor misrepresentation of what I heard Fenn say yesterday.


7 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:58 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
If Washington had a face-to-face meeting with her, he might have inhaled tiny infectious droplets or his hands might have carried the contagion to his mouth or nose. Such an encounter is the most likely mode of infection, but it is by no means the only one possible. Even scabs and dried-out body secretions can transmit smallpox. If someone had recently swept the floors or changed the bedclothes in a sickroom in the Clarke home, desiccated but dangerous particles may have circulated aloft. Finally, one last form of transmission bears mentioning. Variola can survive for weeks outside the human body. Carefully stored, it retains its virulence for years. Thus it is conceivable that George Washington caught smallpox from an inanimate object (often cloth or clothing) contaminated with the virus.

Thanks for the article, Saber, but I feel sick after reading this.

8 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:58 PM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
In July 1763, Sir Jeffrey Amherst, Commander-in-Chief of His Majesty's forces in North America, wrote Col. Henry Bouquet at Carlisle, Pennsylvania and asked: "Could it not be contrived to send the Small Pox among those disaffected tribes of Indians? We must on this occasion use every strategem in our power to reduce them."

Bouquet replied: "I will try to inoculate the _____ with some blankets that may fall in their hands, and take care not to get the disease myself. As it is a pity to expose good men against them, I wish we could make use of the Spanish method, to hunt [the Indians] with english dogs, supported by rangers and some light horse, who would, I think, effectually extirpate or remove that vermin."

Amherst replied: "You will do well to try to inoculate the Indians by means of blankets, as well as to try every other method that can serve to extirpate this execrable race. I should be very glad [if?] your scheme for hunting them down by dogs could take effect, but England is at too great a distance to think of that at present."

The Conspiracy of Pontiac, Francis Parkman, volume 2, pp. 39-40. Parkman states that smallpox broke out at Fort Pitt in the summer of 1763; and cites a report from the spring of 1764 that smallpox had been raging for some time among the Mingoes, Delawares, and Shawnees near Fort Pitt.

When I saw this article, I wondered if Amherst's biological warfare had come back to bite the colonists and Brits.

9 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:59 PM PST by DeaconBenjamin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monsterbunny
Check my further post. Slap was withdrawn.
10 posted on 11/16/2001 1:26:59 PM PST by beekeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Thanks for the article, Saber, but I feel sick after reading this.

Well, then it's certainly a good thing you repeated the most pustulant section.


11 posted on 11/16/2001 1:27:00 PM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Bump!
12 posted on 11/16/2001 1:27:01 PM PST by Soul Citizen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Gosh...just in time to pique my appetite for lunch!-) Good article.
13 posted on 11/16/2001 1:27:09 PM PST by beowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Interesting post. It reminds me of my g-g-g-grandfather's will, ca.1785, Drakes Branch, VA. In it he refers to his illness and the illness of others in his household. Then he divvies up his goods, his plantation, his livestock, and his slaves for among survivors.

In particular reference to the slaves, he cites his own illness again and makes certain bequests to his widow and children and then provides alternative bequests, in case there be further deaths amongst the household.

He had been a Colonel in the Virginia Militia during the Revolutionary War, and I had always assumed that he was dying of old age -- being in his 60s. After reading this review, I wonder if the household had been struck by smallpox, or some other plague. I'll have to dig out my copy of that will and study it again.

14 posted on 11/16/2001 1:46:25 PM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I have a stupid question after scanning the article. Some of the victoms of the pox were buried hastily some times in a posible unmarked grave? Would it be possible, since imbalming was not done then, would the body make a good host to provide storage to the virus? With all the new construction plowing into a lost cemetary could it release the longivity type of pox?
15 posted on 11/16/2001 7:14:57 PM PST by GREY GHOSTt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Our greatest real risk is that DNA engineered bugs get carried out of a lax Russian lab in an ampule in someone's coat pocket. But the Iraqis and N. Koreans might have some also.
16 posted on 11/16/2001 8:27:21 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson