Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Review of] The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring
Home Theater Forum ^ | 28 Nov 2001 | "Ron & Chris"

Posted on 11/27/2001 8:56:31 PM PST by sourcery

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-208 next last
To: sourcery
Call me shallow, but I'm mainly looking forward to seeing Marton Csokas... yummy!
81 posted on 11/28/2001 7:22:42 AM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
I agree with your argument 100%. If we want decent movies, we'd better go and watch them when they come along once in a while. I think that there's another reason for supporting LOTR: we might persuade Hollywood to pay attention to ensemble casts again, as opposed to just one or two stars.
82 posted on 11/28/2001 7:28:12 AM PST by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: slhill
So my question is, is anyone planning to boycott LOTR given that Ian McKellen is a prominent gay activist?

Not me. If I "boycotted" every movie that had a gay person associated with it, I'd probably never get to see another movie again for the rest of my life.

83 posted on 11/28/2001 7:29:22 AM PST by jpl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: rintense
I too,am looking forward to the movie.
84 posted on 11/28/2001 7:29:49 AM PST by cardinal4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
This movie will be bigger than Star Wars.

Did you hear me? Let me say that again...

THIS MOVIE WILL BE BIGGER THAN STAR WARS!!!!!!

Ever since last Tuesday I've been listening to the soundtrack every chance I get. Some tracks on that make for even more lethally fast driving than "Duel Of The Fates" ever was! :-)

85 posted on 11/28/2001 7:30:38 AM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
I understand that some changes are necessary to translate 1500 pages into 3 movies, but as long as they don't replace major characters I'm fine.

Well, yes... It's using one medium to interpret another. Of course, I'll have to wait 'til I see the movie to critique it. I stand by my comment about changing a classic though. If I take a photograph of the Mona Lisa, I shouldn’t use Photoshop to fix her smile.

I haven't seen or heard the delivery of the "come and claim him" line.

I agree that Bombadil is an easy and painless character to cut. (My least favorite part of the book.) I would prefer they cut entire characters rather than change them or rewrite them--It's much cleaner and historically accurate.

There you go--that's better. It's like rewriting history. It is history--for goodness sakes. It's the history of Middle Earth and Tolkien painstakingly preserved it for us, and we shouldn't rewrite it.

86 posted on 11/28/2001 7:33:53 AM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
I'm wondering, do you think I'll get flamed?

Yawn....oh bore...why bother? Not worthy of the effort...yawn.

87 posted on 11/28/2001 7:38:12 AM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: slhill
So my question is, is anyone planning to boycott LOTR given that Ian McKellen is a prominent gay activist?

Will gays boycott Ian McKellen because he starred in a movie based on a story written by a devout Christian?

88 posted on 11/28/2001 7:40:31 AM PST by JoeSchem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I can't wait, but it can be as faithful to the story line as it wants to be. If it doesn't hold the theology that Tolkein was so interested in sharing I will be very disappointed.

I remember the movie adaptation of The Shining. It was a good adaptation as screen-plays go, but it lacked something. I couldn't put my finger on it, but I was very disappointed. In a later interview, Stephen King said that Kubrick ruined the movie because he didn't believe in G-d. Therefore, what was intended to be a movie about good vs. evil was simply a movie about Jack Nicholson going crazy. Bingo!

I hope Fellowship does not suffer the same fate.

Shalom.

89 posted on 11/28/2001 7:40:54 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MarkWar
So you think Elijah Woods looks like a girl? And you are attracted to girls? Let's examine your behavior, shall we?

1) You claim not to like Lord of the Rings or any work of this nature and yet you constantly appear on these threads.

2) The nature of your posts are to show that LOTR is somehow a latent homosexual story.

3) You believe that all such stories, I assume even going back to Roland and the Paladins, are along the same lines as you have portrayed. (i.e. Young man just entering manhood is guided by an older man who is not his father.) And you view this as a commercial of some kind for NAMBLA.

As far as I can see, you are the only one who views the movies as such and then you want to rail against them. The funny thing about projection is that the projector often has no idea why they fixate on things and why the things they fixate on make them so upset. The only other reason that I can come up with on why you want to rain on other people's parade by posting stuff like this is you are a troll looking to cause problems, but I can't believe another Freeper would be that big of a jackass.

90 posted on 11/28/2001 7:43:11 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
I think people use magic in this movie. I'm scared for my children's sanity.

There are actually not that many people in this movie, and none of them use magic. Some Wizards do. The Elves do, if you can call it magic. The Elves don't call it magic, but they don't bother to describe what it is. The Elves aren't very interested in people, as a rule.

Shalom.

91 posted on 11/28/2001 7:45:29 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JoeSchem
I don't know. Are there any gay posters on FR who'd give their views? Were you implying that the idea of a boycott was absurd? If so, why?
92 posted on 11/28/2001 7:46:08 AM PST by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: AuntToots
I'm waiting for something to happen.

A hint - this isn't a Tom Clancy novel. The trilogy is all about the characters and how they rise to the occasion. It is almost not at all about the particulars of the occasion and it is definately not about the action.

Shalom.

93 posted on 11/28/2001 7:47:29 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
I can't remember my LOTR well enough to be sure, but doesn't Aragorn have one of the Rings? The rings are magical.
94 posted on 11/28/2001 7:48:22 AM PST by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

Comment #95 Removed by Moderator

To: ArGee
It's not *only* about the action, but the action is there and it's thrilling. I can still (mis)remember some of the words off by heart: "Sam got up. He was dazed, and blood pouring from his head dripped in his eyes." [From the denouement with Sam, Frodo and Gollum in the mountain]
96 posted on 11/28/2001 7:50:13 AM PST by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
and none of them use magic

Good point.

97 posted on 11/28/2001 7:54:55 AM PST by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: slhill
So my question is, is anyone planning to boycott LOTR given that Ian McKellen is a prominent gay activist?

Not me. I understand Israelis boycotting Wagner because Wagner has the spirit of violence and national superiority that Hitler took for his own. (Hitler was a big fan of Wagner). However, LOTR is not about sexuality at all so I can't imagine ever making the link, no matter what the actors do in their own time.

Shalom.

98 posted on 11/28/2001 7:56:23 AM PST by ArGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
Yawn....oh bore...why bother? Not worthy of the effort...yawn.

I rest my case. heh heh

99 posted on 11/28/2001 7:57:20 AM PST by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: slhill
doesn't Aragorn have one of the Rings?

Not to my knowledge.

The rings are magical.

Not in today's sense or maybe the Harry Potter sense.

100 posted on 11/28/2001 7:58:10 AM PST by ThomasMore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson