Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

It appears that Kroeker is up to his Keister in the lies and left wing spin by the Portland liars er lawyers and mayor!
1 posted on 11/28/2001 8:09:21 AM PST by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave
Portland PD, protectors of terrorists.

Charming.

2 posted on 11/28/2001 8:14:39 AM PST by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
I am constantly amazed at Fat Katz's ability to get her buttboys to toe the line. I'm very disappointed in Chief Kroeker.

Portland is an even bigger national disgrace than that town in Maryland that tried to ban smoking and have now uninvited Santa Claus to their tree lighting.

3 posted on 11/28/2001 8:14:40 AM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Knowing what a ceaspool of socialists that area is up there, I'm leaning toward Portland simply acting out like the Berkley wanna be that it has become. While I don't think any city attorney should blindly follow bad orders, this one is making an ass out of himself and his city.

Portland, put a sock in it. If you'd get your head out of your ---, you'd conduct these interrogations and support your farmers in Klamath Basin.

But then that would be a bit too patriotic hugh.

4 posted on 11/28/2001 8:16:00 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
If, God forbid, we have another 9-11 or worse, these Quislings will wish they had acted differently.
6 posted on 11/28/2001 8:22:29 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Hey, thanks for the help Portland.

See, this is a WAR, not a stolen car ring, get it?

This is about finding sleeper cells of people who want to kill us before they get the opportunity to do so, get it?

8 posted on 11/28/2001 8:25:43 AM PST by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
I'm a big-time civil libertarian (not of the ACLU) type, but I just can't fathom these idiots.

Is it a violation of anyone's civil rights to go door to door after a homicide is commited in the neighborhood? It's the same thing. Police are invesigating according to a demographic.

While I find idiotic lawmaking like the "Patriot Act thoroughly repulsive, I find nothing wrong or unconstitutional about questioning people who fall into the same demographics as the terrorists for information that may be helpful. What the hell is wrong with asking people to voluntarily give information about potential atrocities?

A violation of a civil or human right means that someone is harmed. Can anyone tell me who is harmed by this?

9 posted on 11/28/2001 8:32:44 AM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Hat's off to these guys for having some integrity!
10 posted on 11/28/2001 8:33:29 AM PST by mxbluto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
I wrote the "Acting chief of police" a letter on November the 21st of this year, in it I asked why the Town and its "Acting chief of police" took it upon themselves to refuse the Attorney Generals request to interview the people on the list. I received a reply 2 days later supposedly from the "Acting chief of police". I have not posted this reply because of one of the statements in the reply about the Attorney General's request not being lawful,knowing eventually they would contradict themselves. Looks to me like its not the law they are worried about but their own self interests. In fact the "Acting chief of police" had one of his underlings reply to my letter, but this is to be expected. Here is the reply;

Subject: Re: You are refusing to help the government track down terrorists?
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 07:51:00 -0800
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Thank you very much for taking the time to write. Oregon State Law prohibits local police from questioning immigrants when there is no evidence they are connected to a crime and foreign citizenship is the only issue, therefore if local police took part in this, we would be breaking the law. We do want to cooperate with the US Attorney's Office should they be willing to modify some of the questions that pose a problem under the state law. Again, I appreciate you taking the time to write me.

Andrew Kirkland
Acting Chief of Police
Portland Police Bureau

Officer Kristy Galvan
Chief's Office
(503) 823-0027

12 posted on 11/28/2001 8:42:33 AM PST by JustAnAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
What a bunch of scumbags.

The Left is correct to fear military tribunals. With any luck, Dubya will soon expand these tribunals to include not only foreigners suspected of providing aid and comfort to terrorists, but ANYONE -- foreigner or not, police chief, mayor, judge, legislator, infobabe, or candlestick maker.

The extreme leftwing is chock-full of veteran America haters. Al-Qaeda couldn't hold a candle to them, and they are every bit as much a danger to us as an anti-American amateur like bin Laden.

16 posted on 11/28/2001 8:49:40 AM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
Being a VOLUNTARY questioning, I see no harm in it. Law enforcement can ask anyone any question as a private citizen can. They just cannot require it. Police have a right of free speech as much as a private person does. Immigrants are here at the kindnesss of this nation, not as a right. Therefore, they should be willing to answer.
18 posted on 11/28/2001 8:55:36 AM PST by PatrioticAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson