Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/11/2001 2:37:38 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
This means OBL is not there in Afgan.
2 posted on 12/11/2001 2:42:17 AM PST by KQQL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Whatever happened to "fight to the death" ? They gave us their word. DARN!
3 posted on 12/11/2001 2:46:08 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Hand them over to the UN? What the.....?
5 posted on 12/11/2001 3:07:57 AM PST by lilsparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
This is Japan's chance to help the coalition. Let's put them in charge of prisoners.

I'm sure there's somewhere over there they could march these ragheads to.

6 posted on 12/11/2001 3:39:28 AM PST by Bill Rice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
See in that second paragraph referring to OBL, "alleged terrorist mastermind". I thought we all got past that "alledged" stuff.
7 posted on 12/11/2001 3:39:29 AM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Al Quaeda can't be allowed to surrender or we are negotiating with terrorists.
8 posted on 12/11/2001 3:54:53 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
OBL may not be there. However, I think he is weakened and will have a hard time at his next destination. More bombs please wherever that might be.
11 posted on 12/11/2001 4:19:48 AM PST by NC Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The commander added that the prisoners would be turned over to the United Nations and not the U.S. military. He did not clarify if that was one of the conditions of the surrender agreement.

Right there, that tells me that this is BS. There are no UN personnel in Afghanistan to take control of any prisoners. Nor will we allow them.

14 posted on 12/11/2001 5:12:39 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"The commander added that the prisoners would be turned over to the United Nations and not the U.S. military. He did not clarify if that was one of the conditions of the surrender agreement"

THAT is why I've never trusted those surrender "negotiations". We'll never know WHAT was rally agreed on.

15 posted on 12/11/2001 5:24:33 AM PST by cake_crumb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I'll bet bin Laden the son of Satan is there and that is why they will only accept the UN to surrender to.
16 posted on 12/11/2001 5:27:31 AM PST by Dustbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Every time these guys negotiate a surrender, the really bad guys seem to get away. Lets hope the Northern alliance won't let that kind of crap happen again.
17 posted on 12/11/2001 5:34:22 AM PST by irish guard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Put them in one of those airtight Tupperware box cars for transport. Alliance commanders can just claim to be trying to keep the captured Al Qaeda's "fresh".

Apparently scores of Al Qaeda have suffocated in these boxes being transported to the prison yards. Darn those Tupperware box care people. I smell a products liability suit.

21 posted on 12/11/2001 6:06:16 AM PST by kinghorse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Take no al-Qaeda prisoners. EACH and EVERY one of them must be considered as a potential suicide hijacker and will seek to kill as many Americans as possible as long as they draw breath. REMEMBER 3 MONTHS AGO TODAY. TAKE NO AL-QAEDA PRISONERS!
24 posted on 12/11/2001 6:34:49 AM PST by Two Thirds Vote Aye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The commander added that the prisoners would be turned over to the United Nations and not the U.S. military. He did not clarify if that was one of the conditions of the surrender agreement.

This is the problem with fighting a proxy war. Our interests and objectives are not always protected.

29 posted on 12/11/2001 7:20:58 AM PST by Heisenburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
At first, the Al Qaeda chiefs requested a three-day period to study their surrender, but when that was refused they asked if they could give their answer by 8 a.m. local time on Wednesday.

However, that request was also turned down by the tribal leaders whose forces began their offensive after U.S. warplanes softened up the Al Qaeda with intensive air strikes.

In face-to-face talks with their enemy, the Al Qaeda fighters finally agreed to give up on Wednesday.

Translation: We will fight to the DEATH! - NOT! !

30 posted on 12/11/2001 7:21:43 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson