Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ozzie Smith....a first ballot Hall of Famer?
Self | 01/01/02 | John McCoy

Posted on 01/01/2002 5:54:14 AM PST by jmccoy1252

Hi fellow freepers! How about a little MLB Hall of Fame talk. Ozzie Smith, shortstop for the San Diego Padres and St. Louis Cardinals is up for election to the Hall this year. My question is this, Is the Wizard of Oz a first ballot HOF'er? I have follwed baseball since 1975, and I have never seen a better defensive short stop in the game. Ozzie won 14 straight gold gloves between 1980 and 1992. I still say the greatest defensive play I have ever seen by an infielder was when he barehanded a ground ball and threw the runner out at first base. That was against the Braves either in 1978 or 1979. Some people will argue that Ozzie didn't hit enough to get into the hall of fame at all, much less on the first ballot. Oz was a poor hitter for the first 4 years of his career, but he slowly improved and by 1987, he had a .303 batting average. Also, don't forget the element of speed Oz brought to the game, he stole 580 bases in his career. Ozzie is and was a great ambassador for the game, so in my opinion, yes he is a first ballot HOF'er. The only short stops playing today I would take over Ozzie are A-Rod and Jeter, who are both future HOF'ers in their own right.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last
To: jmccoy1252
YES.


21 posted on 01/01/2002 7:11:11 AM PST by CARDINALRULES
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
Right on. Santo should be in the HOF.
22 posted on 01/01/2002 7:15:08 AM PST by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jmccoy1252
Not on the first ballot.
23 posted on 01/01/2002 7:16:10 AM PST by Wrigley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
As you probably inferred from my earlier post, I disagree 100% with the notion that there is no difference between a Hall of Famer and a first-ballot HOFer.

IMO, Gary Carter is belongs in the HOF, but shouldn't have gone in on the first ballot (and still hasn't gone in, obviously). The difference is that while he was a great catcher and has solid HOF credentials, he isn't Yogi Berra, Roy Campanella or Johnny Bench.

Similarly, I thought it was a sham a few years back when George Brett and Robin Yount went in together as first-ballot picks. Brett, I believe was clearly a first-ballot pick while Yount -- if he went in at all -- certainly didn't have the overwhelming numbers to put him in immediately. Have you ever wondered why Yount went in on the first ballot and Dale Murphy and Jim Rice, among others with similar credentials, are still on the outside looking in?

24 posted on 01/01/2002 7:18:01 AM PST by jeffyraven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: No!
Now who knows what I am talking about out there?

I know, No! What many of these baseball fans don't seem to understand or know themselves is that the Wizard re-defined the way shortstop was played. Without Ozzie, the current crop of "great" defensive shortstops may never have become great. Ozzie let the world know what could be done. He is to baseball what Dr. J was to basketball.

Not only was Oz's ability to pick the ball unmatched, his ability to "get the runner" was amazing. I wish I had the photo of him almost parallel to the ground while letting go with a throw that did get the out. Perhaps only those of us from towns where he played his best ball can really understand how almost miraculous his play was.

His homerun against the Dodgers was icing on the cake. Ozzie made baseball fun again for many, many people. And don't forget the many years he led ALL players in voting for the All-Star ballot.

We St. Louis Cardinals' fans were blessed with his presence as was the city, the metro area and all of baseball.

And while it would be an honor for him to be voted in on the first ballot, Oz is so humble, I'm sure he is just stunned that such an honor should even be discussed.

25 posted on 01/01/2002 8:29:39 AM PST by MSSC6644
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If Ron Santos is not in why should OD be voted in?

Santo should have been a lock. When someone is the premiere player in their leage at a position for ten years, they should go into the Hall of Fame. It shouldn't always be about cumulative career offensive stats. That's

That would also put Ozzie Smith in there.

Tony Oliva too.


Hopefully with living Hall of Faners now having a say about who gets in, some of the oversights of the past will be rectified.


26 posted on 01/01/2002 8:40:03 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jeffyraven
Similarly, I thought it was a sham a few years back when George Brett and Robin Yount went in together as first-ballot picks. Brett, I believe was clearly a first-ballot pick while Yount -- if he went in at all -- certainly didn't have the overwhelming numbers to put him in immediately. Have you ever wondered why Yount went in on the first ballot and Dale Murphy and Jim Rice, among others with similar credentials, are still on the outside looking in?

Because Yount had 3,000 hits. Yet, he was a .285 career hitter and only broke .300 six times in twenty seasons in the bigs. Despite his hit total, he probably wouldn't have been on my first ballot. He's a classic example of how longevity can get you to Cooperstown. So, I agree with you.

For my money, the most deserving player who isn't in the Hall is Bert Blyleven. He's only the fourth-leading strikeout pitcher of all time, but despite two Series rings (two more than Yount) he spent the majority of his career on poor teams and didn't win 300 games (stopped at 287).

He's also the only inactive member of the all-time top ten in Ks who isn't in the Hall. It's time.

27 posted on 01/01/2002 8:43:09 AM PST by Twins613
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Thanks for the picture of Tony-O. Another one who's a better candidate than some who are already there.
28 posted on 01/01/2002 8:43:55 AM PST by Twins613
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I wonder how many great defensive players in the past would have made the HoF if there had been televison at the time. Ozzie clearly benefitted from it.
29 posted on 01/01/2002 8:44:58 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
I wonder how many great defensive players in the past would have made the HoF if there had been televison at the time. Ozzie clearly benefitted from it.
30 posted on 01/01/2002 8:45:21 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: jeffyraven
Robinson also has a dominating bat as well, which Ozzie never had.Balance in the overall game should be the ultimate criteria.
31 posted on 01/01/2002 8:46:44 AM PST by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
If Ron Santo's is not in why should OZ be voted in?

Santo would be making 12 million a year or more, if he were playing today.

Interesting bit of Santo trivia: I believe he was the first player to exercise the 10 year / 5year clause and veto a trade to another team. This preceded Free Agency, and was the first actual victory by any player over any facet of the old Reserve Clause.



32 posted on 01/01/2002 8:47:02 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Twins613
Thanks for the picture of Tony-O. Another one who's a better candidate than some who are already there.

They've finally gotten Orlando Cepeda, Tony Perez, and Bill Mazeroski into the Hall. Oliva is deserving.

Other than a couple of rings, their are a lot of similarities between the careers Tony-O and Kirby Puckett. Oliva has more Silver Bats, though, including one as Rookie of the year.


33 posted on 01/01/2002 8:53:05 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: jmccoy1252
Yes for Ozzie, he was arguably the best ever at the most important defensive position, why wait?

Also yes: Gary Carter, Ryne Sandberg (next year, I think).

Tough calls: Andre Dawson, Goose Gossage, Bruce Sutter, Jim Rice

Close, but no cigar: Ron Santo, Jack Morris, Dale Murphy, Joe Carter, Alan Trammell, Tony Oliva.

34 posted on 01/01/2002 8:54:37 AM PST by Jhensy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The G Man
Ozzie Smith? not quite, if it wasn't for ESPN most would not have known of his defensive exploits. They don't show up in boxscores. He'll probably make it tho.

As for Kurt Warner possibly if he keeps rolling the way he has been, along with another ring.

T.D, as of right now no way.

35 posted on 01/01/2002 8:56:14 AM PST by Mikerow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: jmccoy1252; AmishDude; Dan from Michigan; Hillary's Lovely Legs; All
Anyone know why Bill Freehan, an 11-time All-Star catcher and the last to catch a 30-game winner (Denny McLain) isn't in the Hall?




36 posted on 01/01/2002 8:59:50 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Well, yes. He hit .300 exactly once. Never hit more than 25 homers. Most importantly, he never hit 85 RBI's. Not a bad player, but not HoF material. Stats
37 posted on 01/01/2002 9:09:15 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MSSC6644
Perhaps only those of us from towns where he played his best ball can really understand how almost miraculous his play was.

I believe you are right.
I have followed MLB since 1961 and have been to a gazillion Braves games since 1966.
The Wizard of Oz is, without a doubt, the finest glove man I have ever seen and a clutch performer to boot.
No question....a first rounder if I have ever seen one.

Having watched Dale Murphy for many years....nice guy, maybe Honorable Mention... but NOT Hall of Fame material.

38 posted on 01/01/2002 9:14:25 AM PST by eddie willers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: John H K
And any voter who thinks someone is clearly a HOFer, but doesn't vote for him his first year of eligibility because he's not a "first ballot HOFer" is a mindless idiot who needs to have his voting privledges stripped from him.

I couldn't agree with you more. Quite frankly, I've always thought that to be in the HOF requires a unanimous vote. After all, you either are or are not of that caliber. To say that, among recent entrants, Steve Carlton, Tom Seaver, Dave Winfield, Mike Schmidt, and Nolan Ryan were not amongst the best players of all time is horsecrap. But then again, the very fact that some idiot sports writers with grudges will not vote for someone based solely upon personality (witness the inexplicable absence of votes for Jim Rice) makes my idea pure fantasy.

39 posted on 01/01/2002 9:14:40 AM PST by GreatOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
Other than a couple of rings, their are a lot of similarities between the careers Tony-O and Kirby Puckett. Oliva has more Silver Bats, though, including one as Rookie of the year.

Agreed. Hopefully Kirby's appearance on the dais this year will remind people of Oliva's talent. It's a shame he had to play the last four years of his career basically on one leg.

40 posted on 01/01/2002 9:15:23 AM PST by Twins613
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-113 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson