Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SECRET PAKISTANI AIRLIFT AIDED TALIBAN, AL QAEDA FIGHTERS
The DrudgeReport ^ | January 20, 2002

Posted on 01/20/2002 9:25:53 AM PST by CreekerFreeper

MAG: SECRET PAKISTANI AIRLIFT AIDED TALIBAN, AL QAEDA FIGHTERS

Sun Jan 20 2002 12:15:41 ET

American intelligence officials and high-ranking military officers say that Pakistani Army military and intelligence advisers who had been working with the Taliban in Afghanistan were flown to safety in Pakistan during the siege of Kunduz last November, in a series of nighttime airlifts by the Pakistani Air Force!

Controversial Seymour Hersh returns to the pages of the NEW YORKER, according to publishing sources, in the January 28, 2002 edition, hitting racks Monday.

The airlifts "were approved by the Bush Administration," Hersh reports.

The evacuation, which had been conceived of as a limited operation, "apparently slipped out of control, and, as an unintended consequence, an unknown number of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters managed to join in the exodus."

MORE

One American defense adviser tells Hersh, "Everyone brought their friends with them. You're not going to leave them behind to get their throats cut."

As one senior intelligence official puts it, "Dirt got through the screen."

Indian intelligence officials tell Hersh that they number the escaped officials and fighters at four or five thousand; American intelligence officials put the total far lower. But "the Bush Administration may have done more than simply acquiesce in the rescue effort," Hersh reports.

"At the height of the standoff, according to both a C.I.A. official and a military analyst who has worked with the Delta Force...the Administration ordered the United States Central Command to set up a special air corridor help insure the safety of Pakistani rescue flights from Kunduz to the northwest corner of Pakistan."

The Department of Defense did not respond to a request for comment.

Pakistani leader Pervez Musharraf won American support for the evacuation, Hersh reports, by warning that losing a large number of Pakistanis would jeopardize his political survival.

In India, a recently retired Indian diplomat tells Hersh, the feeling is that "Musharraf has two-timed you. What have you gained? Have you captured Osama bin Laden?"

A senior Indian intelligence official says, "Musharraf can't afford to keep the Taliban in Pakistan. They're dangerous to his own regime. Our reading is that the fighters can go only to Kashmir."

Kashmir remains the flashpoint. "The situation is bloody explosive," a senior Pakistani diplomat says, suggesting that Musharraf has not been given enough credit by the Indian government for the "sweeping changes" he's brought to Pakistan.

A retired C.I.A. officer who served as a station chief in South Asia tells Hersh he found it especially disturbing that each country had "imperfect intelligence" about the other. "Couple that with the fact that these guys have a propensity to believe the worst of each other, and have nuclear weapons, and you end up saying, 'My God, get me the hell out of here.'"

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last
If this is true, the Administration has some questions to answer. What happened to: 'you're either with us or against us.'

Hold all countries that harbor these terrorist thugs accountable and kill all those leaders who assist them in any way, including that two-faced Pakistani President.

1 posted on 01/20/2002 9:25:53 AM PST by CreekerFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
The Taliban was created and funded by Pakistan.
2 posted on 01/20/2002 9:27:15 AM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
FWIW, Rumsfeld said this morning on Meet the Press that he has seen no indication that this happened, and that he likely would have known about it, if it did.
3 posted on 01/20/2002 9:28:41 AM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
The Department of Defense did not respond to a request for comment.

Rumsfeld specifically denied this report this morning on Meet The Press.

4 posted on 01/20/2002 9:29:21 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
I believe the Indian media reported something along these lines, at the time.. and it was even reported right here on FR. Understandably, FReepers dismissed the reports at that time as Indian propoganda.
5 posted on 01/20/2002 9:30:40 AM PST by AM2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
"If this is true, the Administration has some questions to answer. What happened to: 'you're either with us or against us.' "

oh, c'mon. its politics silly...

6 posted on 01/20/2002 9:31:12 AM PST by hoot2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: CreekerFreeper
What happened to: 'you're either with us or against us.'

That was the only cliche George Bush could remember when he was with his speech writer.

8 posted on 01/20/2002 9:32:19 AM PST by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
"'you're either with us or against us.' ...
Hold all countries including that two-faced Pakistani President....What happened to: 'you're either with us or against us.'"

***
Exactly right Creeker

9 posted on 01/20/2002 9:32:24 AM PST by ChaseR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AM2000
The New Yorker is probably even less reliable than the Indian press.
10 posted on 01/20/2002 9:32:58 AM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
"If this is true, the Administration has some questions to answer."

From the Meet the Press transcript:

MR. RUSSERT: The New Yorker magazine revisited the subject that we talked about in December, and they insist that in November—and this is the article—that: “In interviews, however, the American intelligence officials and high-ranking military officers said that Pakistanis were indeed flown to safety, in a series of nighttime airlifts that were approved by the Bush Administration. The Americans also said that what was supposed to be a limited evacuation apparently slipped out of control, and, as an unintended consequence, and unknown number of Taliban and Al Qaeda fighters managed to join in the exodus.” The point being, in November, Pakistan was able to airlift people out of Afghanistan. Did that happen?

SEC’Y RUMSFELD: I do not believe it happened. I can’t prove a negative, but our people have checked to the extent that it is possible to check. We have had enormous numbers of aircraft and intelligence sensors in various ways watching that area. No one, that I know, in—connected with the United States in any way, has saw any such thing as a major air exodus out of Afghanistan into Pakistan. I have read these stories, I’ve heard these stories, I’ve never been able to run them down. No one has ever been able to run them down and prove them, and I doubt them. I think they’re not true.

11 posted on 01/20/2002 9:33:41 AM PST by A Citizen Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Gosh, this is not good. If the report is true there will be hell to pay...against the Bush administration. Could it be we got CON again by those diaperhead gear evil ones?! :(
12 posted on 01/20/2002 9:34:26 AM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: CreekerFreeper
Hold all countries that harbor these terrorist thugs accountable and kill all those leaders who assist them in any way, including that two-faced Pakistani President.

Yeah, never mind that this story is false. Just kill the Pakistani President, right?

Sheesh, I am so glad that grownups run our government instead of some of the people here.

14 posted on 01/20/2002 9:36:25 AM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
Reacting to more bullship from Hersch. No thank you. He hasn't been right on anything pertaining to this war.
15 posted on 01/20/2002 9:42:39 AM PST by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
a) If there was a Pakistani airlift, our military knew about it. It would not have been possible to run airplanes from Kunduz in November without American permission.

b) Hersch's source says 4,000 to 5,000 people were airlifted. That's 50 to 200 flights.

c) There has been one previous story about this activity. Are we to believe that no one saw or reported 50 to 200 Pakistani flights leaving Kunduz airfield, or that the only people who know about are the Indians (who had no known military observers on the ground)?

d) Hersch's story is simply implausible on the face of it.

16 posted on 01/20/2002 9:47:09 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
Sy Hersh's mouth is not a Bible simply because it opens and closes. Sounds like Indian propaganda/exaggeration/BS to me.

Musharraf is walking a knife edge, and India chooses this time to up the ante, knowing he has his hands full. Classic opportunistic foreign policy, classic "world's largest democracy".

17 posted on 01/20/2002 9:49:48 AM PST by WarEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
This story originated a month ago in

DEBKA

Enough said.
18 posted on 01/20/2002 9:51:41 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CreekerFreeper
The New Yorker is a reliable source?
19 posted on 01/20/2002 9:53:28 AM PST by skr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
" ... no ... MAJOR air exodus out ... "

I watched the Rumsfeld interview on MTP. He clearly was holding back on fully answering the question (which is understandable). Parse his answer ... he said he was not aware of a MAJOR air exodus ... a tacit admission, in my book, that they were aware of (and did nothing to stop) a "MINOR" air exodus out.

I'm sure everyone recalls the sketchy news reports at the time. I think it's best to fess up that they agreed to very limited evacuation of Pakistanis, but that it got out of hand.

20 posted on 01/20/2002 9:56:03 AM PST by AngrySpud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-184 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson