hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar

ABC | 2-3-02 | Mia T

[Mia T]

hillary clinton, Congenital Bottom Feeder, Cowers Below Network Radar, Continues to Subsist on Cozy Clintonoid Interviews of Colmes Kind

by Mia T

EW YORK, Sunday, Feb. 3 -- Rather than courageously confronting major league media, hillary clinton continues to subsist on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Again today, clinton chose to be interviewed not by George Will et al. on the network ABC show, Sunday Morning with Sam and Cokie, but by second-string clinton lackeys on third-rate local fare that followed Sunday Morning in the New York market.

Clinton failed to exceed local performance parameters with ease, clogging the airwaves with standard-issue clinton claptrap.

By continuing to eschew the politically obligatory Sunday morning circuit and formidable inquisitors like George Will, clinton only encourages the incipient whispers of ineptitude, depravity and failure that are filling the Senate cloakroom.

 

 

In addition to this display of cowardice, ineptitude, depravity and failure, one of the more significant continuous predictors of clinton's political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know."

 

A marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity, clinton "you knows" were less frequent during this interview than during the one conducted on January 17^th by Jeff Greenfield. This result is consistent with the previous finding, that the frequency of clinton "you knows" varies directly with the intensity of interviewer contempt for the clintons and inversely with the magnitude of interviewer softballs.

If hillary clinton continues to secure her politically moribund position via second-string clinton lackeys on third-rate local fare, Mort Sahl put the intellectual--if not the final--nail in the clinton legacy coffin on CNN's first-waterloo last month.

Sahl, the 60s satirist and self-professed "radical independent," who cut his political-eyeteeth at the Hungry i, announced, "I have no desire to meet clinton; with no morality, there's nothing there." That the eponymous Clinton News Network televised the demise only adds to the irony.

By way of contrast, the intrepid iconoclast, who never knew a president he didn't skewer, went on to express pride in knowing "the two Bushes," the Kennedys and Nixon.

So much for the clinton legacy.

The CLINTON-WAS-AN-UTTER-FAILURE Containment Team Scheme, counterproductive on its face, is now officially dead. If the clintons had any concern for the American aesthetic, they would bury it...and themselves, while they're at it.

 

hillary's head revisited:

hillary clinton's brain (such as it is) II

 by Mia T

The smartest woman in the world would relish "the raucous give and take of American democracy, " as Charles Kuralt once put it.

hillary clinton, by contrast, subsists on cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind...

In her new book, Political Fictions, Joan Didion indicts the fakery of access journalism practiced by vacant politicos like the clintons, whom she sees as "purveyors of fables of their own making, or worse, fables conceived by political strategists with designs on votes, not news."

(More Didion: "No one who ever passed through an American public high school could have watched William Jefferson Clinton running for office in 1992 and failed to recognize the familiar predatory sexuality of the provincial adolescent.")

 

THE HILLARY, YOU KNOW, CLINTON TRANSCRIPT:

Analyzed and Annotated

by Mia T

January 22, 2002

 

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE [YOU KNOW] 'UPDATED'

 

ABSTRACT

Background:

Using internal polling, the clinton 'infrastructure' determined that its cozy-clintonoid-interviews-of-the-Colmes/King-kind-scheme is no longer working. The scheme, which successfully shepherded and shielded the vacuous, inept, corrupt clintons for nine years, is now, post-9/11, yielding diminishing returns--and worse--increasing ridicule.

Hence, we had the clinton 'infrastructure' interviewer recalculation last week that specified more interviewer gravitas...and less lapdog...but not more doggedness...that is to say...that specified Jeff Greenfield.

A miscalculation, as it turned out. Greenfield made up in contempt what he lacked in inexorability. (Although he conducted the entire interview circumambulating on eggshells, Greenfield did eventually ask the ugly questions.)

Analysis:

Greenfield's circuitous path to clinton depravity and failure necessitates a nonlinear analysis of the data; we will use a nonlinear least squares curve fitter. Proportional hazards political survival regression analysis will generate a political survival curve for hillary clinton, which will show her viability (so to speak) over time.

Political survival time is defined as the length of the interval between the initial political trial balloon and political moribundity. Political moribundity is defined as two consecutive political failures--(one in the case of 9/11), or three not-necessarily-consecutive boo-filled public appearances, or one instance of a serious proposal generating laughter.

ASIDE: Since by any of these standards, hillary clinton is already flatlined, the more interesting question for this analysis would be: "What the hell is this moribund loser doing in the political arena, anyway?"

Survival is influenced by one or more factors, called "predictors" or "covariates", which may be categorical (such as the quality of 'infrastructure') or continuous (such as intellect or eloquence or character).

Results:

• clinton rigor mortis rendered any discussion of clinton moribundity moot.
• Nonetheless, one of the more significant continuous predictors of political moribundity is clinton's tic-like insertion of "you know," a marker for ineloquence, vulgarity, ignorance, rube-meets-valley-girl demographics, low self-esteem, anxiety and insincerity.
• clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself. (There is a cautionary tale here for wannabe clintonoid lapdogs.)
• Frequency of clinton "you knows" varied directly with intensity of Greenfield contempt and inversely with magnitude of Greenfield softballs.
• clinton confirmed my hypothesis of Rubin complicity in a clinton coup. See "The Daschle Scheme".

GREENFIELD: Tonight, a conversation with Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton on the nation and the world after September 11, on GREENFIELD AT LARGE.

THE COMPLETE ANNOTATED INTERVIEW (NB: a very long, you know, download because of the, you know, clinton criminal, you know, redundancy.)

[RLK]

The Clintins are looked upon as Gods by many tens of millions of people in America and by hundreds of millions in foreign countries. Correct me if I'M wrong.

[Mia T]

 

IMO, you are absolutely wrong. Even by your measure--money--they fail; with their legal fees and fines, they've yet to break even--even with their personal agitprop-and-money-laundering machine, Simon & Schuster. (see Is hillary clinton's $8M "book advance" a Peter-Principle artifact?)

And if you think these two narcissists aren't suffering, you're wrong. It has nothing to do with shame. It has to do with legacy and worship and power. The clintons must limit public appearances to handpicked groups of sycophants at handpicked sites like Berkeley and Israel or risk being booed off the stage...and worse. The military had to be disarmed when clinton visited Bosnia.

Poetic justice in the end: clinton--both clintons, in fact--are prisoners (both Cartesian and Freudian) of their own depravity, imprisioned in the hermetic confines of an evil, narcissistic life. Their world will finally and fittingly become as small as they, themselves, are...

[Mia T]

Feb. 2, 2002

 

RE: Dem IQ & O'Reilly PC

 

Hey Bill -

 

I'm expending my valuable time to write to you on the theory that a working journalist should strive to be no more than half as dumb as a Democrat seeking office.

 

To borrow from Dick Nixon on paranoia --

Just because you're in your politically correct mode doesn't mean that the Democrats aren't as dumb as doornails, Rush Limbaugh notwithstanding...

 

The proof of the pudding is, as they say, in the eating -- or in this case -- in 9/11 and its aftermath.

 

Choosing to erode a wartime president as they demagogue rights that would be meaningless post-Armageddon, the Democrats demonstrate their total cluelessness; the Democrats fail to understand that "it's the terrorism, stupid" -- amazingly, even today, (post-"it's the economy, stupid" clintons), as new revelations emerge of apocalyptic al-Qaeda targeting that includes nuclear installations, for heaven's sake.

 

Enough with the P.C., Bill.

Time to invoke F.G. (Forrest Gump)

 

"Stupid is as stupid does."

Democrats are dumb.

 

Post-9/11, it is axiomatic.

 

 

Sincerely,

Mia T

Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars

 

BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1^st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF

 

by Mia T, January 31, 2002

 

y any measure, the Carville-Shrum scheme to attack Bush by clintonoid compartmentalization ("praise the Bush war effort / pan the Bush character and economy") isn't working. Ask any pollster or pundit. 

It's the terrorism...and character...stupid

The Carville-Shrum scheme fails because the schemers fail to understand that terrorism necessarily subsumes the economy, that "it's the terrorism, stupid," to paraphrase Carville. The Carville-Shrum scheme fails also because the schemers fail to understand that bill clinton, to paraphrase Lloyd Benson, is no George Bush...and conversely...and the people know it.

 

But perhaps the most compelling reason that the Carville-Shrum scheme fails is that it is a fraud...and the people know it.

 

Compartmentalization scheme a fraud

Does anyone still sentient after eight years of the clintons really believe that the clintons and their "infrastructure" really want Bush to succeed where the co-rapists failed so utterly?

To sabotage Bush is merely to extend into realtime the method of legacy-building historically preferred by the clintons; that is, trash other presidents in an effort to hoist their own sorry collective heft from history's dustbin.

The clintons are constitutionally incapable of understanding that the bottom line is not power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes, and certainly not misbegotten power or money or Nobel Peace Prizes.

They and their minions continue to undermine the Bush war effort even as they assume poses and mouth poll-tested phrases to the contrary. But Bush sees right through this.

In his State of the Union speech, Bush told us:

Our first priority must always be the security of our nation... I will not wait on events, while dangers gather.  I will not stand by, as peril draws closer and closer... We can't stop short.  If we stop now -- leaving terror camps intact and terror states unchecked -- our sense of security would be false and temporary...The price of indifference would be catastrophic.

This was a direct blow to the collective clinton scheme...and paunch...and legacy.

[Mia T]

Fraudulent Democrat Scheme Fails as Bush Soars

 

BUSH: NATIONAL SECURITY 1^st PRIORITY. . ."I will not wait on events, while dangers gather."

 

THE CLINTON LEGACY PLACED IN STARK RELIEF

 

by Mia T, January 31, 2002

Thou art arm'd that hath thy crook'd schemers straight.

Cudgel thy brains no more, the clinton plots are great.

Mia T, On Neutered and Neutering, by Mia T and Edward Zehr (EZ)

 

y any measure, the Carville-Shrum scheme to attack Bush by clintonoid compartmentalization ("praise the Bush war effort / pan the Bush character and economy") isn't working. Ask any pollster or pundit. 

It's the terrorism...and character...stupid

[Republic]

By way of contrast, the intrepid iconoclast, who never knew a president he didn't skewer, went on to express pride in knowing "the two Bushes," the Kennedys and Nixon.

Gotta love ol' Mort Sahl. No doubt about it. (Your lastest Helen Thomas review is 100% ROFLMASSO !!!! )

[InvisibleChurch]

bump for future amusement

[Republic]

clinton uttered "you know" 52 times. Greenfield eventually caught the bug and uttered six "you knows," himself. (There is a cautionary tale here for wannabe clintonoid lapdogs.)

I, you know, LOVED the analysis and results of hillary's, you know, slipping off the cozy, media protected and safeguarded platform. You know...it is ALL TRUE. Perhaps her days of, you know, HIDING behind the alan colme's of this world are over. The attempt at, you know, 'gravitas' (lol) has backfired and perhaps, you know, our heinous would be empress is finally, you know, being exposed in all her naked glory....(using, you know, the term 'glory' very loosely!)

[desertcry]

Your post#40, there is indeed no justice in this world, is there? We will just have to be patient eternally, and eternity is a verrrrrrryyyyy long time.

[FReethesheeples]

An "Oink" for Hitlery & the senescent Helen Thomas!