Skip to comments.
They Will Deport Themselves
February 16th, 2002
| Sabertooth
Posted on 02/16/2002 8:28:04 AM PST by Sabertooth
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
If there were national referendums, this would win in a landslide.
To: CheneyChick; vikingchick; Victoria Delsoul; WIMom; one_particular_harbour; kmiller1k; Snow Bunny...
(((ping))))
To: Sabertooth
Start first with the 300,000 that have been ordered deported but the lamers at INS haven't many clues where they are.
3
posted on
02/16/2002 8:32:55 AM PST
by
dennisw
To: Sabertooth
BUMP. Did you write this?
4
posted on
02/16/2002 8:33:13 AM PST
by
Helix
To: dennisw
All they have to do is look at the few remaining industrial employers in America. I can even give them a couple of places to start. One man supposedly changed his Social Security number 4 times while working for Anvil Knitwear in Swannanoa (outside Asheville) NC. Sounds suspicious to me. Another one which used to employ many immigrants is Collins and Aikman in Old Fort, NC. I can't prove they have hired illegal immigrants. However, businesses which hire a large number of immigrants would seem to be logical places to look.
5
posted on
02/16/2002 8:40:45 AM PST
by
Helix
To: dennisw
Start first with the 300,000 that have been ordered deported but the lamers at INS haven't many clues where they are.
What use is the War on Terror if we Surrender on Soveriegnty?
To: Sabertooth
Rather silly arguement with respect to asset forfiture by illegals, the assets that need to be forfeited are those of our fellow Americans who HIRE illegals.
Remove the cause of illegal immigration by destroying the culture of hiring illegals and they will export themselves.
7
posted on
02/16/2002 8:48:04 AM PST
by
ijcr
To: dennisw
I have a family member border patrol agent
There are new rules in So. Cal...they may not go "looking " for the illegals..they sit and "wait " at check points for the illegals to come to them..they also can not persue more than a mile (I believe that is the distance ..if they happen to see them). Our " border patrol " is a joke..it is fashioned as an open border policy by this administration .(We are simply paying salaries for agents that have their hands tied behind their backs..)It is a game .
8
posted on
02/16/2002 8:48:49 AM PST
by
RnMomof7
To: ijcr
Good point. How about we seize the assets of BOTH the employers and the illegals? I can't think of anything else that would do as much to reduce illegal immigration.
To: ijcr
Rather silly arguement with respect to asset forfiture by illegals, the assets that need to be forfeited are those of our fellow Americans who HIRE illegals. Remove the cause of illegal immigration by destroying the culture of hiring illegals and they will export themselves.
I would enforce the current laws against employers who hire illegals with extreme prejudice. But we need to attack both sides of the invasion equation... The illegals need to be treated as such.
What's silly about that?
To: Billy_bob_bob
How about we seize the assets of BOTH the employers and the illegals?
The premise on which I'm advocating asset forfeiture for illegals is that we can define all of their assets as being illegal proceeds. I'm for strict enforcement against rogue employers, but can we apply the same "criminal enterprise" premise to them?
To: RnMomof7
Our " border patrol " is a joke..it is fashioned as an open border policy by this administration .
Suggestion for new Republican slogan:
The Rule of Law
The GOP Pretends Louder
To: Sabertooth
What would you do about the fact that this would shut down the construction industry, highway repair, and agriculture, as well as hotels and restaurants all over the country?
13
posted on
02/16/2002 8:59:57 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Sabertooth
Well, let us consider the case where you get caught with one pot plant growing on your property. The government will seize your home, your bank accounts, your cars, your furniture and everything else that you own. Then, without money, you get to go and hire a lawyer and prove to the government that you didn't get all of your possessions by selling drugs.
Now, since our government sees fit to treat us peons like this over something as minor as a single pot plant, don't you think it is appropriate for the government to use this tactic against employers who hire illegals? Aren't they choosing to be making their money in a criminal enterprise by hiring illegals? Sounds to me like these employers just might be in violation of RICO statutes.
To: Dog Gone
What would you do about the fact that this would shut down the construction industry, highway repair, and agriculture, as well as hotels and restaurants all over the country?
Rub my hands and cackle as the welfare rolls shrank.
Once they're empty, we can make up for any shortfalls by adjusting legal immigration.
To: Sabertooth
"The rule of Law: The GOP pretends harder!"
Oh man, don't ever forget the old adage "truth purchases hatred". The Bushies are going to flaming you but good now. Hope you brought your asbestos undies!
To: Billy_bob_bob
Now, since our government sees fit to treat us peons like this over something as minor as a single pot plant, don't you think it is appropriate for the government to use this tactic against employers who hire illegals?
Your analogy is appropriate, but I feel much of the government's seizure policies in the drug war are excessive and wrong, so I'd be disinclined to pursue that principle against the employers of illegals... at least as a matter of general policy.
However, more finely-tuned asset forfeiture policies both against egregious illegal employers and drug kingpins would be welcome improvements.
To: Sabertooth
I'll settle for aggressive implementation of the RICO laws against these employers.
To: Billy_bob_bob
The Bushies are going to flaming you but good now.
You talking about the "Protest too much" Brigade?
Funny what reflexes a touched nerve will jerk.
To: Helix
Thanks for the bump... yeah, I wrote it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-91 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson