Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I Believe Predestination
myself | 2/18/01 | myself

Posted on 02/18/2002 8:54:15 PM PST by rwfromkansas

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-547 next last
To: rwfromkansas
Some of the deeper teachings of Christianity lead to predestination at some level.

On another issue, I wouldn't mix OT and NT quotes. Reason being that Christ came to dump the old law and replace it with the New Covenant. A whole new ballgame.

161 posted on 02/19/2002 7:41:37 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
So no one can choose God until God chooses them and he can't choose them until the hear the Gospel, is that what this is all about?

HuH??

Ephesians 1:4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:

But because of our total Depravity we can not seek after God.

Romans 3:10 As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one:
3:11 There is none that understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God.

2 Corinthians 4:4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.

So some thing has to happen so that we will want to hear the gospel

John 3:3 Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.

Only when Our heart has been changed by His grace can we hear and respond to the gospel.

Romans 1:16 For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek.

162 posted on 02/19/2002 7:43:33 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Does God have free will?

Now THAT is an interesting question. Can God will Himself not to be good? Is God just because He has willed Himself to be just? In my estimation, these questions fall into the same category as "Can God make a rock so big He can't lift it?"

163 posted on 02/19/2002 7:45:08 PM PST by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
yes, like Calvinsim at it's most basic, Scripture is ignored in favor of quotes ... the Beast out of the bottomless pit is the Devil ... Hell was prepared for the Devil and his angels ... not for mankind ... people only end up there by rejecting the Gospel ... John 3:17-18 ... however I've learned that the obvious context of Scriptures, taken as a WHOLE, do not usually work in these discussions ... I'll stick to the Scriptures solely on the subject ... FReegards ...
164 posted on 02/19/2002 7:45:43 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
That's funny....I seem to recall Jesus saying not one jot and tittle would pass away...hmmmm. :)

The OT sheds light on the NT and you can't say you are rightly dividing the Word of Truth if you decide to ignore the older half.

165 posted on 02/19/2002 7:46:42 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
excuse me? So you post your little proof-text and somehow think we are the ones ignoring the Bible? Nonsense....We have posted 10 times as many Scriptures as you have even bothered to mention.
166 posted on 02/19/2002 7:49:36 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
Just because we have finite minds, doesn't mean we can't have any concept of the infinite

Well, see, right there is the crux of some issue or other. We don't have finite minds. Minds are infinite. I'll just say that.

On another thread today we learn there may well be another dimension besides the three of space and one of time. Another dimension that we are just beginning to be aware of, and it may be detectable in the lab using ordinary physics techniques. The extra dimension is quite a bit larger in appearance than clusters of synapses, and it is possible synapses are operating in the new dimension and that all our minds are linked.

This is my leap: All our minds are one through this new dimension, --which is neither timelike nor spacelike,-- and it is the mind of God, but we are not aware of this due to our animal bodies and our world distracting us.

167 posted on 02/19/2002 7:52:03 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Bobby777
Explain how one can be written in the Book of Life from the foundation of time without predestination. Take into account the enslaved nature of man and chaos of free will. Take into account that foreknowledge in Scripture does not mean just merely looking ahead in time. I mention the last point because Arminians would try to say that people get in the B. of Life because God looks ahead, sees who all chooses him, and then he writes their name in that book. There can be no such interpretation of this passage.
168 posted on 02/19/2002 7:55:05 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
well this will be my last post to you because I know the pointlessness of this argument ... personal predestination is simply unBiblical ... yep, I've read the whole thing multiple times ... now there is predestination IN CHRIST, which are those things for those who CHOOSE Christ ... otherwise the Great Commission is a sham ... there'd be no point ... feel free to post 100 times the Scriptures or 1000 times the Scriptures ... I know them all ... WHOSEVER WILL means WHOSOEVER WILL ... sorry if that breaks your theology ... it's just flat wrong ...
169 posted on 02/19/2002 7:55:46 PM PST by Bobby777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
All our minds are one through this new dimension, --which is neither timelike nor spacelike,-- and it is the mind of God, but we are not aware of this due to our animal bodies and our world distracting us.

I'm not sure about that. What makes you think it is God's mind? Why couldn't it be, for example, the mind of John Malkovich?

170 posted on 02/19/2002 7:58:36 PM PST by Fifth Business
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: FormerLib
Actually, I believe that the entire topic is so far removed from the totality of Scripture that none of it can be gotten scripturally.

Nice sidestep. You did notice that the author of the thread quoted numerous sources from the Bible. He has it down. Yet you say that even this topic is not scriptural, yet refuse to use the scriptures to back that up.

Interesting. . .

171 posted on 02/19/2002 8:03:13 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Fifth Business
' If His intervention resulted in you being on the winning team after the end-game, that's called 'Election.'

God did not elect me. He gave me the ability to choose. God chose (Election), ahead of time (Predestination) to sacrifice His only Son, Jesus Christ that I may be restored (Sanctification) to Him...if I so choose.

172 posted on 02/19/2002 8:10:35 PM PST by slimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
The OT sheds light on the NT

Yes, and the other way around even more strongly. The NT stands quite well by itself, but the OT can be studied to see where the changes were made. Fulfillment of the Mosaic law indicates completion, and this is all explained in the NT. Once you 'get it' you will act correctly without needing all the rules spelled out.

173 posted on 02/19/2002 8:18:42 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
**Two questions:

**1. Does God have free will?
**2. Are we made in His image?

1. Yes, since after all he is God. 2. We were created in his image, but that image was corrupted after the fall. Therefore, one can't assume we have the same attributes we did before the fall (like free will).

That certainly is convenient.

Somehow I'm reminded of an old Ray Bradbury story where a kid starts telling his buddies "I wanted you to do that." after every move. Predictably he gets thumped by his irritated companions, and as they head home he winds up screaming triumphantly at them "I want you to do everything you do for the rest of your lives!"

Not sure why I thought of that. Inevitable, I guess...

174 posted on 02/19/2002 8:31:01 PM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Fifth Business
What makes you think it is God's mind?

It goes back to the meaning of the Logos. As in John 1:1, in the beginning was the Word. Logos is translated as Word. I take that as Mind, although there are other metaphors, the NT is jam packed with parables about this.

It is the thing behind consciousness, behind soul, behind personality, behind You.

John Malkovich also has a piece of the Mind.

We can explain biology and evolution and chemical processes, rightly or wrongly, but we can't explain consciousness. Where did that come from? We can't know that, it's a total mystery. So we'll just call it the Mind.

175 posted on 02/19/2002 8:31:27 PM PST by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
Thanks for taking the time to post your obvious careful study of God's Word.

Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth. 2 Timothy 2:15

Abundant blessings in the name above all names!
Jesus Christ our Lord and Saviour!

176 posted on 02/19/2002 8:50:51 PM PST by 4Godsoloved..Hegave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Interesting Times
Convienent? It is the Bible. Our nature is corrupt....call me nuts, but God is not corrupt.
177 posted on 02/19/2002 8:57:25 PM PST by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
The article as with most Calvinist doctrine misses the one crucial argument put forth in scripture. That is that God is Love. God wanted a bride so He created man. He wanted His Love returned or in others words to be loved back. This is the nature of relationship. But, in creating man out of love in order to have a relationship he had to give man the ability to choose to love God back. That is why He place the tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden. Man chose unwisely and was forced to live by rules laws morals and values to be with God. These things could never satisfy the demands of a relationship based on Love, love is not obeyed it is chosen. God chose to love us, we choose to love Him.

The other thing that love requires is risk. This is very important. Everyone of us that has ever fallen in love with someone has put themselves at risk that the object of that love might reject them. God knew this as well. He created us with the right inherent in love to turn to Him and reject His offer of Love towards us. Mankind rejects Him every second of every day yet He still loves us. Some people find out that He loves them and accept Him as their God, Jesus as their God and savior and He frees us from our sinful conditions and marriage to the law, causes the death of our sinful nature, and gives us a brand new nature capable of loving Him back through His own love in our hearts. To me a God Who puts Himself at risk of being rejected by the one He Loves is a much much bigger God than one who merely preprograms some lucky ones to be His bride. That sounds like the prearrainged marriages in third world countries. No choice. Just do it.

No, we are all predestined to be conformed to the image of Jesus, to be saved, to be Loved by a God who understood that Love was a choice. But, unfortunately, many will reject His love proposal. And to be honest with you, this kind of Calvinst doctrine portrays God to the world as more of a Geppetto than a God of Love

178 posted on 02/19/2002 8:57:58 PM PST by StacyMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Senator Pardek
I was using the term reprobate in the theological sense, not in the colloquial sense.

A reprobate, by definition, is not elect.

179 posted on 02/19/2002 9:00:31 PM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
Thanks for the essay!
180 posted on 02/19/2002 9:02:06 PM PST by the_doc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-547 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson