Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mourners Gathering At Site Where Danielle's Body Was Found: (Post van Dam News Here)
Union Tribune ^ | March 1, 2002 | Seth Hettena

Posted on 03/01/2002 4:04:47 PM PST by FresnoDA

Mourners gather at site where Danielle's body was found




ASSOCIATED PRESS

March 1, 2002


Associated Press
Mourners place flowers and a stuffed animal Friday, on the site under an oak tree where 7-year-old Danielle van Dam's body was found along Dehesa Road.


Associated Press
Andy Black looks over a memorial for 7-year-old Danielle van Dam after placing flowers Friday on the site where her body was found.
EL CAJON – Laura Davis said she felt drawn to the quiet patch of shade under an oak tree where searchers this week found the body of 7-year-old Danielle van Dam.

"The memory of her soul compelled me to come down here and say a last goodbye," Davis said Friday, cradling her 7-month-old daughter and wiping away tears. "To actually see the place where her innocent sweetness was lying under a tree." Davis, 26, added white flowers to a growing memorial of messages, bouquets, a pink teddy bear and a stuffed blue bunny that marks the place where authorities believe a neighbor dumped Danielle's body weeks ago.

Dental records confirmed Thursday that remains found by a rural roadside 25 miles east of San Diego were those of the little girl, who vanished from her bedroom Feb. 2.

The cause of death could not immediately be determined – and may never be – because of the body's state of decomposition, said Police Chief David Bejarano. Further tests were under way.

Danielle's parents, Brenda and Damon van Dam, said the unflagging efforts of more than 2,500 volunteers who searched a vast area stretching from the ocean to the desert left them with "an overwhelming sense of gratitude and closure."

"With love for an innocent child and for one another, the community has brought her back to us, and for that gift we offer our most sincere and heartfelt thanks," the van Dams said in a statement. "Even though the final outcome is horrible, we could not have imagined the rest of our lives without this closure."

A memorial service is expected later this month.

A neighbor, David Westerfield, 50, was charged Tuesday with murder, kidnapping and possession of child pornography. He has pleaded innocent and is being held without bond.

Authorities said they found traces of Danielle's blood in Westerfield's motor home and on an article of his clothing.

The self-employed engineer spent the weekend of Danielle's disappearance traveling in his motor home, stopping in the desert east of the city, authorities said.

A hunch led volunteers to the area – the remote road was one Westerfield might have taken the weekend Danielle disappeared, said Bill Garcia, a private detective who coordinated searches.

Nearby residents said they were unsettled by the discovery of Danielle's body so close to home.

"It kind of sickens us," said Charles O'Neill, 28, who lives about a mile away. "We've been driving by this road every day for the past month and knowing she's that close is something we never would have imagined."



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 661-663 next last
Comment #261 Removed by Moderator

To: quimby
Thanks, I'll give it a shot
262 posted on 03/02/2002 12:22:20 PM PST by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: Jaded
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't that whole cross thing started by MADD. It was suppose to mark a place where someone was killed by a drunk driver or the dd killed themself. Originally it was just the cross and has morphed in to shrines.

You may be right. Just as long as the crosses and shrines serve as reminders and not distractions. BTW, I wonder what the liabilities are, if any, for a roadside cross or shrine?

263 posted on 03/02/2002 12:24:45 PM PST by BradyLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Do you ACTUALLY think that a fellow "swinger" is going to come forward and tell on himself? It's LAUGHABLE!!!!

Do you ACTUALLY think that the Van Dams are going to be "swinging" while all this attention is focused on them?? It's RIDICULOUS!!!

By all means, their lifestyle put their children in jeopardy.....playing cards with straight friends and "swinging" with strangers are really NOT in the same league.

264 posted on 03/02/2002 12:34:38 PM PST by Ann Archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: Valpal1
I don't know. Ol' Dr. Lee sure blew it at the OJ trial. I think even OJ supporters were unimpressed. Some wondered if he'd lost his touch--if not his marbles.
265 posted on 03/02/2002 12:43:44 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
One interesting part ofthe J&K interview was regarding Douglas Pierce. He apearently offered a reward. The Van Dam's stated that he was causing them trouble. Pierce supposedly represents a group called "the millenium childrens fund."

Another interesting part was BVD stating they returned from the bar at 2:00 and the friends stayed "a few minutes and then left."

266 posted on 03/02/2002 12:44:01 PM PST by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: vacrn
if there is a transcript of the Van Dam interview that they gave on the "John and Ken Show?"

Sorry, but I have no info. on that interview....I live in CO., so I didn't even know they did that interview. That's a local to CA station, isn't it? I'm sure some FReeper might have the info. you're looking for.

267 posted on 03/02/2002 12:47:50 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Those are the only photo's of grief in three weeks? Hmmmmm....
268 posted on 03/02/2002 12:48:38 PM PST by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: quimby; ~Kim4VRWC's~
Kim, maybe you can check quimby's links for more of your research. From post #266: Another interesting part was BVD stating they returned from the bar at 2:00 and the friends stayed "a few minutes and then left."
269 posted on 03/02/2002 12:49:51 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Fresno DA
Let me add a couple of points:

1. Why have no grandparents, aunts or uncles of Danielle surfaced to say anything about this case?

2. The VD's have changed their stories about Westerfield many times, and the story that now mostly seems likely or believed, they could have denied if it made them too close to him, but I think that it makes them still NOT AS CLOSE as the facts were.

Where are the previous family and contacts, not just well meaning upper-class San Diegans, in the group helping the VD's and wishing them well? Are they ashamed? Do they think the VD's themselves will be charged with something?

270 posted on 03/02/2002 12:50:43 PM PST by crystalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Yep, there's lots of articles and conflicting statements...it's a project for you, that's for sure.
271 posted on 03/02/2002 1:01:27 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: quimby
I was able to listen to part of the interview, but it cuts off about halfway through. It was interesting to me that Brenda stated "I honestly don't remember dancing with him" (meaning Westerfield).

Don't remember? That does not seen very emphatic to me. I would know, yes or no, if I danced with someone or not! Especially a suspect!

272 posted on 03/02/2002 1:01:32 PM PST by vacrn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: golitely
Ok, I will do that when I get done with these...
273 posted on 03/02/2002 1:01:51 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
I'm on the 5th or 6th article and haven't found anything significant yet.. But that doesn't mean there is one. The reporter's changed the 10 from 10:30 bedtime. She told the police 10 or 10:30. The reporters have different times.
274 posted on 03/02/2002 1:03:41 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
is = isn't
275 posted on 03/02/2002 1:03:59 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: Palladin
One of the tabloids is reporting today that Westerfield told police he and Brenda had been having an affair in his home and in his RV. Granted, this is a gossip sheet. But could they print something so cruel without a reliable source in the SDPD?

What would be surprising is if this was not the case! Something has been wrong from that very night they were out partying. The parents are indirectly culpable with their choice to subject these children to their lifestyle, even while the children were present in the home. That is beyond deplorable!

276 posted on 03/02/2002 1:04:52 PM PST by JustPiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: golitely
Anyone can listen to the Van Dam interview by cuttin and pasting the link at post 260 into wondose media player.

Listening to the inteview and the discussion of how they found Danielle missing in the morning, caused me to think about the scene. If westerfield had kidnapped her, he must have known they (and the police) would be looking for her. To wait until 9 am to leave would seem to be rather brazen, even for a killer.

277 posted on 03/02/2002 1:05:57 PM PST by quimby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 269 | View Replies]

To: quimby;vacrn;~Kim4VRWC's~
BVD stating they returned from the bar at 2:00 and the friends stayed "a few minutes and then left."

Yeah, I remember this story. Then I remember something about the husband almost insisting to his wife she came home at a different time....then there's the newer info. that not only a couple women friends came over, but the guy who was at the bar.

278 posted on 03/02/2002 1:08:30 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: quimby;golitely;spectre
To wait until 9 am to leave would seem to be rather brazen, even for a killer.

Agreed. But, isn't there "proof" by neighbors, or whomever, that he did actually leave at that time? If he killed Danielle during the night or early a.m., I can't imagine he would leave her body in the motor home until his "scheduled" departure of 9:00 a.m. .....

279 posted on 03/02/2002 1:11:06 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 277 | View Replies]

Comment #280 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 661-663 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson