Replies

The VDs have a lot of supporters here--not just for their (alleged) grief, but also their lifestyle.

Weird, isn't it? At the very least it APPEARS that the VD's depraved proclivities were a factor in Danielle's vulnerability.

I think of it akin to a parent placing his/her child in a car and driving drunk. If an accident occurs, it can surely be said that the parent meant no harm. However, the consequences don't change.

I happen to believe that there is a lot of truth to the "lifestyle" stories. Of course the couple refrains from comment for a number of reasons, but I bet they know they contributed to this horrific situation. Danielle was unguarded and they know why......or maybe even more about her abduction.

And it's even possible they knew her attacker, and even knew that he might have been a little perverted. I mean, if you're living a perverted lifestyle--let's come out and call it what it is--molesting a child is just a couple of degrees of perversion away from watching your spouse have sex with strangers, while indulging in the same. I know "someone" will whine and screech about this, but I think it's time to start speaking frankly.