BTW, tell me why all the focus on the perp entering the home thru the back door? Just because the van Dams SAID it was open? The van Dams also said their home wasn't locked? So it's really not even a factor which door the perp used.. He could have just walked through the front door of an open house. But it sure makes them look like more responsible parents to at least say "the sliding back door was open, we saw the red light on". So how can they prove this?
We are also taking the van Dams WORD that the perp snatched the child from her bedroom? Maybe she wasn't in her bedroom when she disappeared? Maybe she was downstairs? Who really knows? BUT the van Dams SAID, so we have to believe them?
See, Pete, they don't HAVE to prove anything, it was their daughter murdered. Then we have Westerfield, who is guilty till proven innocent.
sw
From an article that has been posted on this thread twice. Apparently LE think they know
Within hours of receiving a frantic 911 call from Danielle's parents the morning of Feb. 2, police knew the 7-year-old Sabre Springs girl did not wander off. Detectives determined she had been kidnapped after she had been put to bed, although they will not say what led them to conclude that so early. Immediately, they sealed off Danielle's pink and purple bedroom to preserve a critical crime scene.