[Michael2001]

Throwing the baby out with the bath water. You're probably right. Much better to have Algore in there.

I'm not singling you out, because there were about 100 posts just like yours. Take a step back and think about that comment for a second. Didn't we here at FreeRepublic struggle to understand how all these Democrats could still back Bill Clinton after what he did? If George Bush had sex in the Oval Office and then lied about it under oath, would you still support him because he is better than Al Gore?

[Dec31,1999]

If George Bush had sex in the Oval Office and then lied about it under oath, would you still support him because he is better than Al Gore?

It's an important question. Thank God Laura's in charge.

[Howlin]

Didn't we here at FreeRepublic struggle to understand how all these Democrats could still back Bill Clinton after what he did?

Yes, we did. What's your point? You have totally mischaracterized this bill. My question to you is why do you insist on posting false information about this bill -- even after you have been repeatedly been told you are wrong? What is YOUR agenda?

If George Bush had sex in the Oval Office and then lied about it under oath, would you still support him because he is better than Al Gore?

No, I don't support liars OR enablers.

[Rome2000]

If George Bush had sex in the Oval Office and then lied about it under oath, would you still support him because he is better than Al Gore?

That's a ridiculous question, because Bush would never do such a thing. Are you equating amnesty for illegal aliens in an attempt to keep the leftist SOB rat party from running away with the mexican-american vote to Klinton's defiling of the Oval Office?

You're comparing apples and oranges.

You may have liked the excitement of the last election, but unless Bush can get the latin vote we may not be in the White House again for a long time.