Skip to comments.
Is It Possible, Could America Have Won the Vietnam War In '1968?
Article by: Gene Kuentzler '1999 ^
| 3/17/02
| Gene Kuentzler
Posted on 03/17/2002 2:25:49 PM PST by Mom_Grandmother
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-215 next last
Comment #101 Removed by Moderator
To: Mom_Grandmother
I won the Vietnam War.
102
posted on
03/17/2002 4:42:08 PM PST
by
onedoug
To: Mom_Grandmother
Surely there may have been something in-between as far as weapons are concerned. What? Don't you get it, if you don't have a willing ally in place a war is as good as lost. We won against the Taliban in Afghanistan. Why? Because we had allies (the Northern Alliance) who were willing to fight. Imagine the hell it would have been if we had unwilling allies in Afghanistan. Plus we were able to defeat the Taliban with a minimal number of ground US forces because of those allies. Fortunately the US military has gotten a lot SMARTER since Vietnam days.
To: mad_as_he$$
Yes people, what is it with the French. I had uncle's in Germany and France during WW11, they cleared the Germans out of France and I think we even helped rebuild their city. Why the knife in our backs when Reagan needed their air space when he went after Libya, and all of the belly aching today, they should be backing us and glad to do it, for their sakes as well as ours? Thanks
To: Mom_Grandmother
What do you mean, "possible"? If Barry Goldwater had been elected in '64, the Vietnam War would have been a dim memory by 1968. By now, South Vietnam would have been rivaling South Korea economically.
105
posted on
03/17/2002 4:44:58 PM PST
by
Check6
To: PJ-Comix
Diem was so loved that those Buddhist monks set themselves on fire. One problem was that you had the Catholic Diem family ruling in a nation of mostly non-Catholics.
-------------------------------
That a hand full of deluded fanatics burned themselves misses the point. The reason the Buddhists killed themselves was because of the effectiveness of Diem's pograms and the irrelevance of Buddhism. Catholocism brought litteracy, medicine, and other advancement to the country. The Buddhists were becoming irrelevant. People were turning from Buddhism. It was a dying organization. In protest, a few Buddhists committed suicide. They were the Taliban of the area who couldn't adapt to the present time. So be it.
106
posted on
03/17/2002 4:46:15 PM PST
by
RLK
To: Mom_Grandmother
In the movie, "The Hanoi Hilton," a Vietnamese officer tells an American POW, "Your journalists are going to win this war for us." I remember this movie was supposedly based on actual interviews of 100 POWs.
107
posted on
03/17/2002 4:47:19 PM PST
by
saminfl
To: Mom_Grandmother
This is a war that could have been won two or more years earlier if some geographical changes had been made: Haiphong Bay and Hanoi Harbour.
Comment #109 Removed by Moderator
To: onedoug
"I won the Vietnam war." Best one yet, Thanks.
To: saminfl
...And Ho Chi Minh and Chairman Mao also celebrated when Kennedy had Diem assassinated. They knew Kennedy destroyed the South in the act. They thought Kennedy was nuts.
111
posted on
03/17/2002 4:52:14 PM PST
by
RLK
To: PJ-Comix
Look, I'm here to learn, not to be preached at because of something I may not know, there are lots of things I don't know, so kindly talk to me, not down to me. Thank you.
To: RLK
(1)I thought that ARVN suffered enormous casualties, and that the NVA targeted them over the U.S. forces.
(2) I've heard that the South would have held even after the U.S. left, if Congress had just supplied them with arms to match the Soviet Union's aid to the North.
To: Thorn11cav
Now, when you talk about the Mongs or the "yards"...now your talking first rate fighters. Trouble was that they were detested by most ARVNs for ethnic reasons.
Another piece of work was the cousin of President Thieu, a Lt. Colonel named Hoang Duc Ninh. In addition to levying tribute on almost every commodity in his province, he fired artillery shells aimlessly into rice patties so he could sell off the brass shell casings, he freed VC prisoners for payoffs, and even sold artillery barrages to support besieged ARVN troops. However, no payoff, no supporting shellfire.
And he was just one of a corrupt many.
To: Check6
I refer you to post #112. Thanks.
To: secretagent
I've heard that the South would have held even after the U.S. left, if Congress had just supplied them with arms to match the Soviet Union's aid to the North. They were supplied but how many of those supplies were sold off for cash? Bottom line, we had a terrible ally. Corrupt and not really willing to make battlefield sacrifices.
To: xm177e2
And if the military had been honest with the media from the start, maybe Cronkite would not have just assumed they were lying when they told him Tet was a failure.You give Cronkite too much credit for honesty. I think the military already knew what the American Journalists were and were afraid to tell them anything.
117
posted on
03/17/2002 4:56:08 PM PST
by
saminfl
To: Mom_Grandmother
I'm not talking down to you. But the bottom line is there was NO WAY we would have used nuclear weapons in Southeast Asia. On top of that we had a corrupt ally unwilling for the most part to fight to the finish. The NVA were willing to make the sacrifices.
As I posted before, Vietnam was probably the WORST place on the planet to confront the communists.
To: Mom_Grandmother
then, they heard "Walter Cronkite" (former CBS News anchor and correspondent)Later in the war I still remember Cranktite saying we must get out of Vietnam and I exloded in rage. I had just finshed drinking a can of beer at the time or I would thrown at the TV. It was the last time I ever watched him to this day.
To: RLK
...And Ho Chi Minh and Chairman Mao also celebrated when Kennedy had Diem assassinated. You make it sound like Ho and Mao were bosom buddies. They weren't. Read Vietnamese history. The overall theme was the paranoia the Vietnamese had over being conquered by the Chinese again. Notice that when the Vietnam war ended that the Chinese and Vietnamese had a number of battles on their border. No, I'm not crazy about Vietnamese (or any other type) of communism but they did keep China out of Southeast Asia. We acted under the illusion that they were all a solid front.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100, 101-120, 121-140 ... 201-215 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson