Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: golitely;~Kim4VRWC's~
I believe that Brenda gave the pages to Pierce. Where the problem comes is when Pierce files a complaint with CPS. Apparently the parents were not best pleased. He just didn't get on the wagon. The VD's probably wouldn't like a number of posters on FR, and would most likely call us freaks too. So what?

Just curious how does not paying taxes for a foundation impact his credibility? He got the money. Does this situation apply to the BAIL BONDSMAN who put up money? Does it bring his integrity in to question? What must his motives be. Surely he works with less savory people. Besides the purpose of most foundations is that they are a TAX SHELTER, not a do-good institution, and you move your shares or cash in it when you need it. Generally they are not for profit institutions.

90 posted on 03/23/2002 2:35:29 PM PST by Jaded
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: Jaded; FresnoDA; spectre; wonders; rolling_stone; crystalk
Let's play a little game of "why." Why would the van Dams lie on the stand about things they had to have known would be revealed--either at the PH or later during the trial? Dancing with Westerfield is perhaps the most obvious of several--did Brenda really think the bar was empty or something? We always said there had to be witnesses, and sure enough, some of them came forward and made statements that yes, she danced with Westerfield. Damon, too, spun a convoluted web of doors open, doors closed, times, alarms beeping, magnets and more--why? Anyone watching thought him untruthful and evasive (according to most polls). How can the vDs think that lying and evading truth is going to help convict their daughter's killer?

If, that is, they have the killer in custody. And Crystalk has, several times, suggested an alternate theory that perhaps the child somehow died as an accident, and the entire thing is smoke and mirrors. Kind of makes you go "hmmm...."

But seriously, WHY the need for the van Dams to lie?

91 posted on 03/23/2002 3:18:42 PM PST by MizSterious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: Jaded
Hi *J*

WRT: pierce, he stated in that article that he did not have the money..no credibility...IMHO. Yes, he said "he knows someone" who said they'd put the money up...so where is it? Who are they? I wonder if the people who discovered Danielle are going to see a dime of it. Maybe they didn't meet the stipulations, whatever they were. Frankly, I'm wondering if they'll actually accept the reward(s) offered anyway. I wouldn't..

I might have missed the report that said pages were ripped out of the diary.. That would be very strange indeed...where did you read that?

100 posted on 03/23/2002 9:35:21 PM PST by Freedom2specul8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson