Just curious how does not paying taxes for a foundation impact his credibility? He got the money. Does this situation apply to the BAIL BONDSMAN who put up money? Does it bring his integrity in to question? What must his motives be. Surely he works with less savory people. Besides the purpose of most foundations is that they are a TAX SHELTER, not a do-good institution, and you move your shares or cash in it when you need it. Generally they are not for profit institutions.
If, that is, they have the killer in custody. And Crystalk has, several times, suggested an alternate theory that perhaps the child somehow died as an accident, and the entire thing is smoke and mirrors. Kind of makes you go "hmmm...."
But seriously, WHY the need for the van Dams to lie?
WRT: pierce, he stated in that article that he did not have the money..no credibility...IMHO. Yes, he said "he knows someone" who said they'd put the money up...so where is it? Who are they? I wonder if the people who discovered Danielle are going to see a dime of it. Maybe they didn't meet the stipulations, whatever they were. Frankly, I'm wondering if they'll actually accept the reward(s) offered anyway. I wouldn't..
I might have missed the report that said pages were ripped out of the diary.. That would be very strange indeed...where did you read that?