Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A CLASS STRUGGLE: Tenure of Avowed Marxist Controversy jolts College
Houston Chronicle ^ | March 24, 2002 | KEVIN MORAN

Posted on 03/24/2002 1:47:13 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife

"In a nutshell, it means I have a fundamental disagreement with capitalism," he said. "I think that capitalism is a system based on exploitation and oppression and domination and racism and war and lots of other things.

"So I'm totally opposed to capitalism, and I think that the majority of the people of this country ought to get together and transform the system," he said. "I think we need to replace capitalism with some kind of democratic socialism."

TEXAS CITY -- It rarely stirs up much of a fuss beyond the campus boundaries when a college board considers granting tenure to a professor.

However, the case of David Michael Smith -- avowed Marxist and unabashed critic of capitalism -- can indeed be called a rare one at College of the Mainland in this Galveston County town.

The 47-year-old Smith has attracted a small but vocal group of critics who say that, rather than receive job security, he should be fired.

That doesn't appear likely. The board is expected to approve his application for tenure Monday, or protection from firing for arbitrary reasons such as his political beliefs.

Opponents of Smith, an assistant government professor who joined the faculty in August 1998, say he has violated academic principles by pushing his political agenda in his classes.

He denies trying to indoctrinate students in Marxist philosophy in his classes but says he's not shy about expressing political views that few Texas academicians espouse.

Born in Salina, Kan., Smith received his three degrees at City University of New York and taught at the university's York College from 1985 until he joined College of the Mainland.

His specialties are political theory and American politics, and his classes are popular. He has been nominated as "Outstanding Teacher of the Year" each year since he arrived.

That doesn't carry much water with Howard Katz, who was 10 when he and his parents fled to the United States from Nazi Germany in 1936. Katz says he joined the Army as soon as he turned 17. He went to the Pacific but didn't see combat.

Katz, a former faculty member at the college, is among Smith's most outspoken critics.

"I lost both sets of grandparents in the Holocaust," he said. "I'm a strong defender of free speech and of academic freedom. David Smith has a right to stand on any corner and say anything he wants.

"But in a classroom, teachers are held to a higher standard by the principles of academic freedom."

What does being a Marxist mean to Smith?

"In a nutshell, it means I have a fundamental disagreement with capitalism," he said. "I think that capitalism is a system based on exploitation and oppression and domination and racism and war and lots of other things.

"So I'm totally opposed to capitalism, and I think that the majority of the people of this country ought to get together and transform the system," he said. "I think we need to replace capitalism with some kind of democratic socialism."

Smith's personal political beliefs didn't draw substantial public criticism until a guest column he had written appeared in the Galveston County Daily News on Sept. 20, when emotions were still running high after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

In the column, he argued that dropping atomic bombs on Japan was not necessary to end World War II.

At least two other columns were written by others debating the issue, and many residents sent letters to the editor as the dispute heated up.

Then, in November, at a campus ceremony honoring veterans a few days before Veterans Day, some of Smith's students handed out fliers advertising a demonstration against the war in Afghanistan.

"It totally disrupted the Veterans Day celebration here," said Katz, 75, who lives in Houston.

Fifteen students later signed a letter that was published in a local newspaper, condemning the decision to hold the veterans' ceremony on campus. They likened the affair, attended by some college board members, to a formal endorsement of the war by the college.

"I can judge David Smith by his writings and the writings of his students," said Katz. "I read the letter by `sickened' students about us murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians every year, bombing innocent civilians and dropping cluster bombs that are dismembering children as if we were doing it deliberately. No other country has gone to the pains that we have to keep what they now call collateral damage to a minimum.

"They didn't get that at high school. They didn't get that at home, I don't think," Katz said. "There's only one place they could have gotten that, and that's in David Smith's class."

Smith said Katz misinterpreted the letter.

"What the students were pointing out is that the United States has, in fact, killed large numbers of people, whether it's in Korea, Vietnam, indirectly in Indonesia, more directly in Nicaragua and El Salvador," he said. "So the students were pointing to a history of U.S. imperialism, and that is something that more conservative folks don't want to admit."

Katz was among a half-dozen people, including former Galveston County Judge Ray Holbrook, who attended the college board's human resource committee meeting March 18 to oppose tenure for Smith.

Informed that that was not on the committee's agenda, the group promised to attend the board's meeting Monday.

While they'll get their say, they likely will go home unhappy.

Board members, who are elected, recently expressed general support for Smith and indicated that he'll win tenure based on his performance.

"We have nothing that says (Smith) is doing anything but what we've asked him to do, and he's doing it in an excellent, incredible way in the classroom," board President Ralph Holm told fellow members.

Board member James E. Butler said he believes Smith's opponents are trying to turn a purely academic issue into a political battle.

"I've been torn between keeping my mouth shut and fighting back against them," Butler said.

Katz and others believe Smith distorts history, leaving out details that don't fit his political views.

"He is disingenuous in citing authorities, and these authorities are only the ones supporting his views," said Katz, a former police officer who taught criminal justice courses at the college. "That is known, by any standard, as intellectual dishonesty and deceit."

Tenure is a longtime, and often controversial, policy in American higher education.

Among other functions, it "protects the instructor from termination of employment by an influential person or group for arbitrary reasons," said Dr. Homer "Butch" Hayes, College of the Mainland president.

To qualify for tenure, a faculty member must document to the satisfaction of a peer group that, among other qualities, he plans instruction well, provides classroom experimentation and innovation and improves instruction.

At this campus of 3,400 students, the faculty works in teams. If an instructor's team approves, it recommends tenure to Hayes. If Hayes agrees, he carries the recommendation to the board.

Hayes said he will recommend tenure for Smith on Monday.

Bob Young, an economics professor who leads the faculty team to which Smith belongs, said Smith's political views shouldn't be banned from the campus.

"I'm a veteran myself, and I don't remember ever being told that I was fighting for a single point of view or that, in the time I spent as a light-weapons infantryman, I was going to be exposed to only one set of ideas when I went to a university setting," said Young, who served in the Army in the 1960s and was stationed in South Korea. "I think these other veterans have a slightly different view of what America's all about."

Smith teaches two introductory courses on national and state government and an elective course in political science.

"In each of the courses, my syllabus sets out certain topics that I cover, and I certainly am honest about putting forth my own views," he said. "But I actively encourage people to question my views -- to express their own different views.

"Sometimes, a lot of the best learning is done by debate, discussion and disagreement," he said. "And one hallmark of my classes is that you can get extra credit by arguing with me during class. I think that's a good thing.

"We ask embarrassing, tough questions, like who is in the government, exactly whose interests are served by the government, what are the connections between business and government and what can working people do about it."

His politics don't include violence, he noted.

"Do I favor a small group of people going out and getting guns and attacking the government or anybody else? Of course not," he said.

Smith said he does support "radical or revolutionary social change."

"I think we need deep-seated, fundamental, systemic social change," he said. "But I believe it has to be done by a vast majority of the people, using a combination of electoral and (other) tactics."

He said he respects his critics' right to their opinions.

"But they are deeply misguided in trying to impose a political litmus test on faculty at College of the Mainland," Smith said. "Thankfully, the college has a long record of defending academic freedom in the face of controversy."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: academicbias; diversity; education; indoctrination; multiculturalism; nationalsecurity; schools; universities
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last
To: gaspar
I want to know since when does an Assistant Professor get tenure? The usual track is Assistant, Associate, and full Professor.

No, they have it right in the article. An Associate Professor has tenure. A full Professor is an additional promotion. Some Universities also have gradations of full Professor, others don't.

41 posted on 03/24/2002 4:34:13 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If things are so bad in the USA under our capitalist system why is this guy living here? I'm sure he has a nice home, a car, TV & DVD, home computer with unrestricted Internet access, can travel without restriction, read whatever books and magazines he wants etc. Certainly he would be happier living in such communist workers paradises as North Korea and Cuba.
42 posted on 03/24/2002 5:02:42 AM PST by The Great RJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Hopefully, online learning will eventually make many of these college campuses obsolete.
43 posted on 03/24/2002 5:08:15 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"...purely academic issue..." my freakin' butt! This is a determination as to if we will continue to allow the hate-America first crowd to control higher education, read that brain-washing, of this country.

The University of Wisconsin used to be an excellent eduacational institution. Since the radicals that tried to burn it down in the 60's took over its hallowed halls, it has become nothing but a Marxist Think Tank, the home of political correctness and a joke.

44 posted on 03/24/2002 5:09:00 AM PST by Redleg Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Check6
Our public schools and public universities have gone to Pot, most people do not seem to care.
45 posted on 03/24/2002 5:11:41 AM PST by Texbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HDawg
Fuedalism may actually be better than Communism !

Tnure should ALSO be thrown out.

46 posted on 03/24/2002 5:26:03 AM PST by hoosierham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
For myself, the possibility of tenure is the only thing that keeps me in academia

I rest my case. The thing(s) that should keep you in academia should be the rewards of teaching, both monetary and psychological, the motivation to learn, grow, excel and the status and stature of the profession. In many educational systems today, both secondary and collegiate, it is difficult to get any of these.

As far as potentially having to move if you get laid off, that's the real world and it is a fact of life that only the insecure should fear.
47 posted on 03/24/2002 5:37:12 AM PST by pt17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: The Great RJ
If things are so bad in the USA under our capitalist system why is this guy living here? I'm sure he has a nice home, a car, TV & DVD, home computer with unrestricted Internet access, can travel without restriction, read whatever books and magazines he wants etc. Certainly he would be happier living in such communist workers paradises as North Korea and Cuba.

Oh no! The professor needs to spread the word to our children. He needs to plant seeds of our destruction. The attack on the WTC has opened the eyes of a lot of Americans unaware, or unconcerned, with the curriculum or the inflitration of our education system by subversive thought. Maybe they'll also take a critical look at media and government "servants" and see the frightening trend.

48 posted on 03/24/2002 5:37:21 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
If the Marxist guy is teaching the required material, he can stay.

However, this case is an example of the problems that arise with 'tax-funded education' -- one cannot discriminate against repugnant views, since "all" views must be included in a "public" institution.

Let's abolish public ed -- or leave the guy alone. If he's an indiot but doing his job, there is not much that can be done, here.

I was recently terminated at a community college in Los Angeles, for failing to join the Teacher's Union. Had done nothing wrong, have a Ph.D., several publications. Students loved my classes, & I helped them get $1,000's of dollars of scholarships to complete their educations. I was on several committees on campus, had the Faculty Senate president in my corner. However, I've learned that Academic Freedom is a very limited and selectively applied concept. It's used rather blatantly as a political tool, on most campuses out here in California. I teach economics and am a libertarian. But I kept my personal views to myself, since I am teaching a social SCIENCE, not running for office. Unfortunately, most of my colleagues have no intention of teaching the science of their field -- they view their classroom job as an opportunity to lobbying for the Democrat party, getting the students to volunteer for Democrat campaigns and so forth, for "extra credit" in a Poli Sci class. That's the way academia is nowadays, and there's not a darned thing you can do about it, aside from urging privatization of the whole higher ed system. I am sure the taxpayers of California would love to hear about the required 'volunteerism' for Democrat campaigns in State college Political Science classes, courtesy of their tax money, and plan to write a book when this is all over. I go to arbitration to get my job back this spring - wish me luck.

P.S. Teacher's Unions and Tenure must go. Collective bargaining is for cowards and communists, and Tenure is greedy protectionism of society's Elite. It is truly nauseating to have grown, highly educated adults 'demanding' job security. Teachers are not lettuce pickers, they are (presumably) the society's most educated and most skilled. If they can't cut it as teachers, they will find employment elsewhere, with their considerable educations. If we can't have cut throat competition among educators, our most highly trained, then -- in what industrial or labor sector CAN we have it? Watching some of my colleagues wax poetic and mewl like little kittens about how glad they are to be protected by Tenure is pretty vile. No wonder the average businessperson, forking over thousands to support school systems and struggling without the safety net of job Tenure to provide for his family in a volitile marketplace, has nothing for contempt for these sheltered, pampered soccer-mom socialists. It's embarrassing to have to work with this infantile, sheltered crew on a daily basis. Don't shed tears for them -- SIDE WITH THE CUSTOMERS, the Students. Abolish Tenure - NOW.

49 posted on 03/24/2002 5:43:28 AM PST by 4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
Sorry for the typos:

volitile = volatile,

California = the armpit of higher education.

50 posted on 03/24/2002 5:50:30 AM PST by 4Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"I think we need deep-seated, fundamental, systemic social change"

What does he think we've been getting since the 1960's?

--Boris

51 posted on 03/24/2002 5:50:32 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steve Eisenberg
I 90% agree, otherwise I wouldn't be on this board. However, I still don't see having a few willing-to-admit-it Marxist profs as much of a problem.

I had a Communist professor when I took American government in college, I got an A and I was already pretty conservative because I was working my way through college. Probably the ones who are upfront and honest about their philosophies are better than the ones who claim to be something different.

52 posted on 03/24/2002 5:51:33 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Texbob
"Our public schools and public universities have gone to Pot, most people do not seem to care."

Correction: Pol Pot.

--Boris

53 posted on 03/24/2002 5:52:04 AM PST by boris
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Check6
This proves what Tony Sanchez has been saying: "Texas is more liberal than you think." Also, notice that large numbers of students are rushing to get into the classes of this Marxist. Perhaps he is "giving grades" to keep students contented. The students probably don't listen to what he is saying -- probably don't even understand his views -- they are just there for an "easy A," I suspect. Students tend to avoid the instructors who have higher standards and expect more. They are looking for the easy way. Also many of the students are probably collecting federal subsidies to attend -- so for them it's a matter of getting the "most (grade point average) for the least (effort)." Ultimately, this is the government paying people to be irresponsible. Have we heard that before?
54 posted on 03/24/2002 5:52:57 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
Teachers are not lettuce pickers, they are (presumably) the society's most educated and most skilled. .......It's embarrassing to have to work with this infantile, sheltered crew on a daily basis.

Exactly, they're sheltered and that gives them protection from being removed.
This is a very healthy environment for one point of view to gain a long term foothold.
Maybe it's time you became an advocate for your point of view while there's still time.

55 posted on 03/24/2002 5:53:19 AM PST by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
As long as parents are willing to go into debt to send their kids to these leftwing educational mills and as long as the alumni keep feeding in the big $$$ this crap will not end.

That's very true ---most of the kids going to these types of colleges aren't paying their own way. I think what's far worse than a communist/marxist professor are the feminists and multiculturalists in the colleges, what they teach is even worse.

56 posted on 03/24/2002 5:55:51 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
This proves what Tony Sanchez has been saying: "Texas is more liberal than you think."

Certain areas in Texas at least are extremely liberal --I know because I live in one of those very liberal areas where it seems most people believe in government redistribution plans and are quite marxist. Tony Sanchez has big support in many areas of Texas because he is basically a marxist and his drug money laundering for the Mexican cartels seems not to be a problem for him either.

57 posted on 03/24/2002 5:59:57 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
Public education is an oppressive monopoly protected by unions and politicians.
58 posted on 03/24/2002 6:02:01 AM PST by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Tenure was intended to protect instructors from political harassment. It is now used to protect bad instructors friendly with the administrators, and it is often used to "discipline" good instructors at odds with socialist administrators through the seldom-known process of "post-tenure review." So, where there is tenure, it should be abolished; where there is no tenure, it should be implemented!
59 posted on 03/24/2002 6:02:26 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: TxBec
Communism is ALWAYS installed by force.
60 posted on 03/24/2002 6:04:21 AM PST by Wagonmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-108 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson