TVF still insists the "Face on Mars" is an artifact. It is an artifact, but only an artifact of the low resolution of the Viking orbiter cameras. It's a natural formation. Still an interesting book for the Exploding Planet Hypothesis (EPH). Since the first edition, TVF has revised the EPH to include an earlier EP to account for the KT impact and extinction.
Dark Matter,
Missing Planets
and New Comets:
Paradoxes Resolved,
Origins Illuminated
by Tom Van Flandern
old edition
Red Planet's Ancient Equator Located
Scientific American (online) | April 20, 2005 | Sarah Graham
Posted on 04/24/2005 8:18:25 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1390424/posts
I have seen the device that destroyed that planet, it eats planets, smashing them to rubble, digesting them for fuel:
http://www.st-v-sw.net/images/Trek/Series/TOS/TOS2-doomsday-blast2.jpg
just a bttt, with a handy link of interest:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=catastrophism
Perhaps it was the planet believed to have smashed into the earth causing the mantle and debris to coalesce into our moon?
So when are they going to teach his in public school?
bump
Good post, and thank you for the other one earlier.
>> Such a huge area would take multiple robotic or human exploration missions, each with significant roving abilities.
We have a rover still up there that was hopefully garaged when we left it.
The next manned mission will need to include a can of gas and some jumper cables.
I hate that fifth planet. I'm glad it's destroyed.
Maybe Planet #5 was too busy talking on its cell phone and drove into oncoming planets.
Calculated positions of rings of condensed dust and gas compared to actual planet locations.
