Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: U.S. Supports Israeli Defense
AP - Las Vegas Sun ^ | March 30 2002

Posted on 03/30/2002 10:19:29 AM PST by scratchgolfer

Bush: U.S. Supports Israeli Defense

CRAWFORD, Texas- President Bush said Saturday that Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat "can do a lot more" to prevent attacks against Israelis and that the United States supports Israel's right to defend itself.

"I believe he can do a lot more to prevent attack," Bush said in his first comments since Israeli troops laid siege Friday to Arafat's headquarters in the West Bank on Friday after 30 Israelis were killed in a week.

"I am deeply concerned about the loss of innocent life. ... I fully understand Israel's need to defend herself," the president said at his Texas ranch where he had kept a silence while monitoring Friday's developments.

Bush also said U.S. envoy Anthony Zinni will remain in the region to continue his efforts at arranging a cease-fire.

Just as Bush began speaking, there was fresh violence in Israeli. An explosion went off Saturday evening in a cafe in Tel Aviv's crowded entertainment district, and paramedics said there were dozens of casualties.

Bush stepped up his Mideast diplomacy Saturday with calls to five world leaders. But the president announced no new action by his administration to end the bloodshed, such as sending Vice President Dick Cheney back to the region.

He urged all Middle East leaders to strongly condemn the attacks against Israelis, but singled out Arafat.

"He has got to speak up," Bush said. "He need needs to stand up and condemn ... these attacks."

Asked if he thought the administration could do more to help end the cycle of violence, Bush said U.S. officials are spending "a great deal of time" on the matter and he is committed to ending terrorism in the Middle East and around the world.

In addition to harsh words for Arafat, Bush insisted Israel must work to reduce the violence. He urged Israel to "make sure there is a path to peace as she secures her homeland."

"There's got to be a peaceful solution," Bush said.

Bush made calls from the ranch to King Abdullah II of Jordan, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan, Prime Minister Jose Maria Aznar of Spain and Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah, who has offered a leading peace initiative.

The president did not speak with Arafat or Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

White House spokesman Gordon Johndroe said the conversations covered the Middle East and the U.S. commitment to moving the peace process forward. Johndroe knew of no plan to send Vice President Dick Cheney back to the region.

The spokesman did not indicate what Bush heard from the leaders.

Spanish officials said Bush and Aznar, who holds the rotating chairmanship of the European Union, agreed on the need to find a common EU-U.S. position regarding a solution to the crisis.

The president also had a conference call with Secretary of State Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice, his national security adviser.

In the West Bank town of Ramallah, where Arafat's headquarters were under siege, Israeli soldiers rounded up hundreds of Palestinians in a sweep for militants. Arafat was effectively penned in a few rooms of his office building with water cut off and food dwindling, surrounded by Israeli tanks and troops.

At the United Nations, the United States joined other U.N. Security Council members Saturday in adopting a resolution that calls on Israel to withdraw its troops from Palestinian cities.

In his weekly radio address, Bush appeared to refer indirectly to the conflict in the Middle East. For Christians and Jews in this season of religious observance, he said, "Faith brings confidence that failure is never final, and suffering is temporary, and the pains of the earth will be overcome.

"We can be confident, too, that evil may be present, and it may be strong, but it will not prevail."

The president, his wife, Laura, and his parents, former President Bush and Barbara Bush, planned to attend Easter sunrise services Sunday at a Crawford church.

Honoring Easter and Passover, Bush told Christians and Jews their faiths offer bastions of hope in a world scarred by evil.

"We can be confident that evil may be present, and it may be strong, but it will not prevail," Bush said on the radio.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2002 10:19:29 AM PST by scratchgolfer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
It says a lot when Arafat is surrounded by the Israeli troops and confined to one room, and all Bush really says is how Arafat has not done enough. What Bush didn't say (Israel should pull back, etc.) speaks volumes - he has picked the right side and the right course.
2 posted on 03/30/2002 10:23:32 AM PST by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
I hope that you are right!
3 posted on 03/30/2002 10:24:58 AM PST by RamsNo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: scratchgolfer
In addition to harsh words for Arafat, Bush insisted Israel must work to reduce the violence.

Give me a _______ break Mr. President.  Addressing Israel in this manner in light of the violence perpetrated against it is outrageous.  It's an absolute insult to anyone's intelligence, including your own.  Israel has shown extreme restraint up until now.  Your dismissal of that fact offends me intensely.

4 posted on 03/30/2002 10:26:23 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Israel is an independant nation who should deal with its problems, we will continue to support israel but it is up to them to handle their problems. Give me a break, what would satisfy you, it is a maddening situation that will never end, and we should stay out of it, since when does israel's problems trump our own war?
5 posted on 03/30/2002 10:32:46 AM PST by Texas Cornhusker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
In addition to harsh words for Arafat, Bush insisted Israel must work to reduce the violence. He urged Israel to "make sure there is a path to peace as she secures her homeland."

That seems to be a strange misinterpretation of the actual statement that Bush made.

6 posted on 03/30/2002 10:33:39 AM PST by IoCaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
In perspective he said Israel must find an avenue of peace, WHILE they are defending themselves which they have every right to do so.

His speech was obvious in his support for Israel without cheerleading.

7 posted on 03/30/2002 10:34:44 AM PST by snippy_about_it
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IoCaster
LOL. I copied his comments directly out of the report. Israel has suffered over 200 injuries and something like thirty deaths in the last 48 hours. To direct any comment at all at Israel under these circumstances is embacillic behavior.
8 posted on 03/30/2002 10:36:51 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #9 Removed by Moderator

To: DoughtyOne
In addition to harsh words for Arafat, Bush insisted Israel must work to reduce the violence.

Which is what Israel is doing by attacking Yasser Arafat. Eventually, the Islamists will realize the hard way that they too must operate in accordance with human morality.

10 posted on 03/30/2002 10:39:15 AM PST by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Texas Cornhusker
What would satisfy me is for Bush to condemn Arafat in no uncertain terms and express sorrow for Israel's losses. That's it, end of story. It certainly takes a brass ba--s and a massive dose of insensitivity to instruct Israel at this point.
11 posted on 03/30/2002 10:40:07 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
No, you copied the reporter's summary of what Bush said, which may or may not have been accurate, and given the quotes actually given, probably was not.
12 posted on 03/30/2002 10:43:19 AM PST by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: The Old Hoosier
Just a couple of moments ago, I heard Bush make the exact statement I copied out of the article at the top of this thread. I didn't mischaracterize it. Qualifying statements later on don't deminish this statement. Bush should address the real culprit and quite admonishing the victim. What part of that doesn't make sense to you?
14 posted on 03/30/2002 10:47:32 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: over3Owithabrain
Having listened to President Bush's address, and answers to press questions following the address, I have to say I'm very impressed with his position. I've been disappointed with the administration's hypocrisy regarding Israel's war on terror versus our own. Today, Bush came out 100% on the side of Israel in it's fight against terror, and roundly condemned Arafat, and other Muslim nations, for their support of terror.

It's nice to have the adults back in charge!

15 posted on 03/30/2002 10:49:45 AM PST by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
The "path to peace" remark seems to be authentic. I suspect it reflects a concern in the Administration that the Sharon government is too divided to decide on a strategic goal, and so gets trapped in battles of attrition that go nowhere. I'm hoping it will turn out to be a very mild statement in the total context of his remarks.

I'm a Bush-supporter who is withholding judgment till I see an actual transcript. I was not a happy camper about the UN vote; an abstention would have done as well.

16 posted on 03/30/2002 10:51:54 AM PST by Southern Federalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Solomon
I agree.
18 posted on 03/30/2002 10:56:11 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It sounds pretty clear to me. Israel has the ok from US to begin full-scale military action, as long as there is a strategic goal and end in mind. I also think we may have voted the way we did in the resolution, to point out Syria's inability to sign an agreement that validated the cause of the action (i.e. suicide bombers).

Seems like a pretty strong position to me.
19 posted on 03/30/2002 11:05:27 AM PST by Pantera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Think about it DoughtyOne. Israel must work to ease the violence. Taking out the Palestinian terrorists IS working to end the violence. Once they've been destroyed, there will be less violence.
20 posted on 03/30/2002 11:07:55 AM PST by stumpy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson