Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rep. McKinney-More than nutty: Chris Weinkopf slams lawmaker for suggesting Bush knew about 9-11
FrontpageMag/WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Thursday, April 18, 2002 | Chris Weinkopf

Posted on 04/18/2002 12:33:15 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

WHEN REP. CYNTHIA MCKINNEY made the asinine suggestion that President Bush was responsible for Sept. 11, she surely never thought her allegations would travel far.

After all, it’s not as if the Georgia Democrat uttered her infamous remark—that the Administration foresaw the terrorist attacks, but let them take place so that the armaments industry could profit from a war on terrorism—on the House floor. Instead, she chose as obscure and disreputable a media outlet as possible, San Francisco’s KPFA, the Pacifica radio station for Bay Area radicals turned off by the stifling conservatism of NPR.

Little did she know that the Washington Post had its ear tuned in to the voice of the far left, and that nearly three weeks later, the paper would publish her comments. McKinney would soon become the target of national ridicule. Fellow Georgia Democrat Sen. Zell Miller described her conspiracy theory as "loony," as well as "dangerous and irresponsible." The congresswoman’s hometown newspaper, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, derided her as "the most prominent nut" among conspiracy-peddling "nut cases."

Such scorn, appropriate and warranted though it is, doesn’t quite go far enough. McKinney deserves not only to be mocked and ridiculed, but censured and condemned, too.

Consider the implications of her suggestion that the White House chose not to "warn the innocent people of New York who were needlessly murdered" because "persons close to this Administration are poised to make huge profits off America’s new war." If it were true, Bush and several other Administration officials could easily be found guilty of treason—a crime punishable by death. These aren’t the sorts of allegations to be bandied about lightly, without direct, solid evidence.

But McKinney has no evidence to speak of—no documentation showing that the White House knew about the attack and ignored it, or that Bush’s singular ambition as president is to further enrich his wealthy friends.

In the controversy that immediately followed the publication of her comments, the Congresswoman issued a statement admitting as much. "I am not aware of any evidence showing that President Bush or members of his administration have personally profited from the attacks of Sept. 11," she admitted, adding that a "complete investigation might reveal that to be the case." McKinney seemingly believes that baseless conjecture is sufficient grounds for an investigation, and that the President of the United States is guilty until proven innocent.

Notably, the Congresswoman let stand her unsupported allegation that the Administration knew the attacks were coming. The only question left in her mind seems to be motive, but she has some ideas. "What is undeniable," her statement claims, "is that corporations close to the Administration have directly benefited from the increased defense spending arising from the aftermath of Sept. 11."

This is the sort of quackery elevated to the level of fine art in Oliver Stone’s JFK—the anyone-who-stands-to-gain-must-be-responsible school of thought. After all, there are many people who stood to gain from 9/11—an attack which, by the way, was largely planned and plotted during the Clinton years.

As long as McKinney is out to find the real killers of Sept. 11, there are some other spurious leads that she may want to investigate. For starters, there are her old friends in the Clinton Administration. Maybe they knew all about the attacks, but declined to tell their successors, in a grand scheme to make Republicans look bad and usher in the federalization of airport-security workers. Then there’s the Red Cross, which profited more from that infamous day than anyone. And, of course, there’s McKinney, who thought she stood to gain by peddling outlandish conspiracy theories to the easily duped listeners of KPFA.

True, there’s no evidence of any such plots, but a complete investigation might reveal them to be the case.

In the US, few people outside the KPFA faithful take mindless and defamatory comments like McKinney’s seriously. But it’s a different story in the Middle East, where the vast majority of "the Arab street" believes that Israel and/or the CIA is responsible for the events of Sept. 11. Hateful Arab delusions have long been nurtured by state-owned schools and media outlets, and now no less an authority than a U.S. congresswoman has indirectly lent her support.

This isn’t the first time McKinney has blown kisses to the radical Arab world. Last Fall, when Mayor Rudy Giuliani declined a $10 million disaster-relief donation from Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal after the prince made comments blaming America’s Middle East policies for the attacks, McKinney smelled an opportunity. She wrote a letter to his Royal Highness in which she not only supported his basic take on world events, but also asked that he send his check to a number of charities working on behalf of black Americans.

Bin Talal declined the offer, but since then, the New York Post reports, he’s undertaken a new philanthropic endeavor. Last week he donated $27 million to the families of Palestinian "martyrs," i.e., terrorists.

Sometimes, it’s more than just loony or nutty to nuzzle up to the nation’s enemies and recycle their rhetoric—it’s downright disloyal.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
Thursday, April 18, 2002

Quote of the Day by friendly 4/17/02

1 posted on 04/18/2002 12:33:15 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
the Pacifica radio station for Bay Area radicals turned off by the stifling conservatism of NPR.

I am glad someone spelled loony right... its not looney!

2 posted on 04/18/2002 12:42:16 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
She needs haldol
3 posted on 04/18/2002 12:45:10 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
she needs a job as a night janitor at a junior high school
4 posted on 04/18/2002 12:46:08 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Frankly, I don't know how they let this nutcase roam the streets. She belongs in a nuthouse, not in Congress...then again, what's the difference?
5 posted on 04/18/2002 12:50:39 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Well, there are a passle of FREEPERS, who think that she's right, and have been repeating the endless propaganda from any and every loony web site , since 9 / 11 / 01. Some have even made up some new details; all on their own. : - (
6 posted on 04/18/2002 12:58:11 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nopardons;JohnHuang2
there is no evidence, thats why we should investigate!

did you know that military contractors are making money from military contracts? its a scandal I tell ya!

7 posted on 04/18/2002 1:03:46 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
did you know that military contractors are making money from military contracts?

Oh my God! Tell me, tell it ain't so! Shocking! Shocking, I tell ya!

8 posted on 04/18/2002 1:11:04 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Why, why ... I'm shocked, I tell you ; just shocked ! People are making money ? Isn't that a crime ?
9 posted on 04/18/2002 1:14:05 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2;nopardons
those are their exact arguments!
10 posted on 04/18/2002 1:15:32 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
Why, why ... I'm shocked, I tell you ; just shocked ! People are making money ? Isn't that a crime ?

I feel your pain -- I'm in a state of shock myself, nopardons. Imagine that. Military contractors making money from.....(gasp!), Military contracts! ;^) Shocking, Shocking, I tell ya!

11 posted on 04/18/2002 1:16:56 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
its a hilarious thing to contemplate, the navel.

Cynthia McKinney will probably get around to it sooner or later, she has basically said the same thing... others, even FReepers, have said the same things.

weird

12 posted on 04/18/2002 1:26:26 AM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
Not sure we could trust her around Jr. High students... eeaakk!!!

"Janitor mckorny... just what did you know and WHEN did you knowit??"

13 posted on 04/18/2002 2:19:27 AM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"This is the sort of quackery elevated to the level of fine art in Oliver Stone’s JFK—"....

IMO, Oliver Stone got it more right than wrong!! McKinney is another story. But anyone who has watched the History Station and seen "The Men Who Killed Kennedy", or has read on the JFK assassination would know Stone is real close. To me the greatest, most important scene of the movie was Donald Sutherland's speech in D.C. to Costner. Very well done.

14 posted on 04/18/2002 3:28:32 AM PDT by ChasingFletch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
What a friggin' nut-job!


The Dishonorable
Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.)

:

Percentage of the time Rep. McKinney voted with the ACLU: 100%

:

15 posted on 04/18/2002 3:30:53 AM PDT by ppaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2;all
JH2, I am embarassed to say this creature "represents" my state- although, thank God! not my district.
Here's what I have on her so far:

-this list-McKinney's Supporters--

-Some of McKinney's Supporters--

Cynthia McKinney in the Twilight Zone: Ask the victims of Robert Mugabe

-Comprehensive List of Terrorists and Groups Identified Under Executive Order 13224--

16 posted on 04/18/2002 3:43:08 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Morning, amigo -- and thanks for the links.
17 posted on 04/18/2002 3:45:14 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: ppaul
Percentage of the time Rep. McKinney voted with the ACLU: 100%

Pure insanity.

18 posted on 04/18/2002 3:45:50 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
'Morning, FRiend- this woman is a disgrace, and I hope this story has "legs" for a while. It probably won't get her tossed out of office, but maybe it will quiet her down for a while.
19 posted on 04/18/2002 3:52:26 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
She's in a tight primary, last I heard. Has her opponent made an issue of her sanity? hehe
20 posted on 04/18/2002 3:54:57 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson