Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wphile
There really shouldn't be a battle at all. This area has previously been approved for drilling. Of course, the Sierra Club has to whine about something, or they couldn't justify asking for donations, I guess.
11 posted on 04/21/2002 7:34:44 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dog Gone
Yes, and just where are those donations coming from, I wonder? I read about contributions from Saudi Arabia. If that is true, then the GOP better get on the bandwagon.

Did you see the thread about how the Senate has now forbade US oil companies from buying oil from Iraq? On the one hand, they ban exploration here at home and on the other, they ban sales from Iraq. Just whose side are they on? Saudi Arabia's?

13 posted on 04/21/2002 7:38:42 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Dog Gone
"[The NPRA] has not galvanized opponents the way the proposal to open up 2,000 acres in ANWR has because it is not a designated wildlife refuge and because its wide sweep of tundra can potentially accommodate wildlife and oil wells more easily than the narrow ribbon of coast in the Arctic refuge."

A sentence that could have been written only by a.) a willing propagandist or b.) an ignorant dupe.

Given that it's the LATimes, the odds are 50:50.

33 posted on 04/21/2002 9:29:23 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson