Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who women's lib actually liberated Exclusive: Barbara Simpson says females duped into ditching home
WorldNetDaily ^ | 4/22/02 | Barbara Simpson

Posted on 04/22/2002 4:40:48 AM PDT by kattracks

Talk about dumb broads

Posted: April 22, 2002
1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2002 WorldNetDaily.com

If women are so smart, why are they so dumb?

And before you get your panties in a bunch, I'm entitled to criticize females because the last time I checked, I'm one of them. Katie bar the door, I'm about to be incredibly politically incorrect.

Women have been sold a bill of goods, which they bought hook, line and sinker. Ever since the '60s, when the brunt of feminism hit the media, the message was clear: Go for it! You can have (be, do, experience) everything!

There's only one problem. It isn't true. Never was. Never will be.

But men knew that. Lost in the burst for female "freedom" was the ugly truth that men, who supposedly had "everything" that women were being denied, were really victims of a system that kept them prisoner.

It was the price they paid for being men. Their role in life was to be the breadwinner, the master of the home, the head and protector of the family, the person ultimately responsible for the survival of his tribe and the soldier-protector of his country.

He had to be brave, smart, hard working and supportive of the family. He had to be husband, father, son, sibling, uncle, neighbor, friend. He had to work to earn the means to play all those roles, and he had no choice.

This isn't to say there weren't scoundrels. Of course there were – men who deserted their women and children, who drank or gambled the family earnings, or womanized their way through marriages which hung together for "the sake of the children."

Guys like that aren't new and are still around. In fact, women's liberation has been great for men who prefer to chill out, and societal changes make it easy.

Want sex? Take your pick. Chicks are there for the asking; in fact, they'll compete to be the "chosen one" for the day. Or night. No questions. No promises. How great is that?

Don't want kids? No worry. There's all kinds of prevention (sounds like a plague, doesn't it?) with most of the responsibility on her. And if they don't "work" and a new life gets in the way, just get rid of it. It's legal, private and accepted. And if she's really a "today woman," she might not even tell you and just "take care of things" on her own. What a gal! What a life!

Don't want marriage? Duh. Just live together. Get the bennies and avoid the legal technicalities. Get tired of that? Leave. Hey, the door is always open.

Women's liberation freed men from responsibility. It encouraged women to "find" themselves. They were urged to "go for it" careerwise.

Of course they could do it. Women are smart and able to work hard and succeed. But by doing it, they walked right into the trap that men had been in all along.

Now they find themselves in careers that are time-consuming, require travel away from home and envelop their lives. In that sense, women turned into what they originally disliked about their men and in the process, made the ugly discovery that a major tradeoff was the signature of their femininity. They gave up or lost the opportunity to be a wife and a mother. Why weren't they smart enough to see that?

A new book by Sylvia Ann Hewlett, "Creating A Life," comes to the conclusion, after surveying nearly 1,200 high-achieving career women, that they missed life. One was quoted as saying "I forgot to have a child."

Forgot? Give me a break! Any woman who "forgets" so basic a part of the female psyche isn't smart enough to be considered a high achiever. Either that or today's standards aren't what they're cracked up to be.

Women always had to choose. The choice for career meant sacrificing the family role. And that is the key. Sacrifice. Women are supposed to have been liberated from sacrifice. They are supposed to be able to have and do it all. Except for the fact that it doesn't work.

The real tragedy of Hewlett's findings is the real, human loss to those women. By the time they realize the loss, they're too old biologically to have a child, and too old socially to find an appropriate man to marry. If she's been divorced or earns too much money, it's even harder.

As for the men, as the old saying goes, why buy the cow when the milk is free?

It makes you wonder who women's liberation really liberated?



Barbara Simpson, "The Babe in the Bunker" as she's known to her KSFO 560 radio talk-show audience in San Francisco, has a 20-year radio, television and newspaper career in the Bay Area and Los Angeles.



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last
To: Nakatu X
It's a very rare thing in this generation for a man our age to not be afraid to love.

Good Lord, is it THAT bad?

I guess I should be grateful for my generation and all those 'sensitive' male types we insisted upon. LOL!

121 posted on 04/23/2002 4:47:00 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: SuziQ
I will probably offend you by saying this but a girl who gets pregnant at 14 is kinda the crackwhore poster child. "The Pill" doesn't work if not used correctly.
122 posted on 04/23/2002 4:48:05 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
"Now, that's not necessarily true. Liberal women prefer their emotions. Conservative women prefer logic and use reason just like men do."

I think we can also say that liberal men aren't very logical either. Actually the entire philosophy is just a seething mass of contradictions starting with being simultaneously pro-abortion but anti-death penalty.

123 posted on 04/23/2002 4:48:09 PM PDT by Let's Roll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: grammymoon
Me too. I kept saying I'd get a job when the kids went to school, got out of grade school, jr hi, high school, and one thing or another I never did get a job. I do the all the financial side of our business and I still do a lot of physical work on it too but I was there to raise my kids and it shows in their lives.
124 posted on 04/23/2002 4:48:23 PM PDT by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Don't get me started on sensitive men thats one of my pet peeves with feminism.
125 posted on 04/23/2002 4:49:37 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I will probably offend you by saying this but a girl who gets pregnant at 14 is kinda the crackwhore poster child. "The Pill" doesn't work if not used correctly.

My niece was 21 when she got pregnant (old enough to know better, I might add) It is her daughter who is 14. And neither of them are crackwhores! They are both very good photographers, as a matter of fact!

126 posted on 04/23/2002 4:50:09 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: weikel
The Arabs are GAY??? Oh, I'm sorry but this is tooo funny. And I have to go now too. Time to cook dinner. It's part of the 'nurturer' in me, ya know!

Have a nice evening. How's that for sappy?? ;o)

127 posted on 04/23/2002 4:50:24 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Finally, just how does a young man like you become so bloody cynical at such a young age?

I'll tell you.

We (the older generation) made him and his cohort that way. We did everything we could to set the stage for the era in which we now live, by becoming the "Me Generation," by electing Bill Clinton, by divorcing each other at a staggering rate, by worshipping the works of our hands and the almighty dollar, by diluting the Christ-centeredness of mainstream Christianity, by building the most materialistic, consumer-driven society this world has seen since Babylon the Great, and by modeling for weikel and all his friends the very essence of "hearts waxing cold toward one another."

I cannot get angry at young people like weikel, because I realize that we in our forties, fifties and sixties have so screwed up the America that once was the shining city on the hill that it's a wonder they aren't more screwed up than they are.

128 posted on 04/23/2002 4:50:31 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: GiovannaNicoletta
I know what you mean but I still say he's there already.
129 posted on 04/23/2002 4:51:04 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Hey WEIKEL!! The 15 year old girl in the post is the BABY, not the woman who got pregnant. Small detail there.
130 posted on 04/23/2002 4:52:49 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
Well if it makes you feel any better Gen X is pretty conservative politically cynics don't really fall for the "feel good" rhetoric of the Democrats.
131 posted on 04/23/2002 4:53:37 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I was referring more to birth control and to the actual act of raising the child. I don't know any unmarried moms my age or younger whose father is still involved in their life (other than perhaps money...) We have a high rate of teen pregnancy here, so I know what I'm talking about.

It used to be that men knew it was their duty to take care of their children. Now, thanks to feminists, they're liberated from that obligation (of course they might have to pay child support, but not every young unmarried mom I know receives financial help from the dad).

Sorry, but you are a prime example of what the author of the article is talking about--men who are reaping the benefits from the feminist revolution. As you said, you're getting all the freebies. And members of our gender (that includes your girlfriend) who buy that crap are shortchanging themselves.

132 posted on 04/23/2002 4:53:50 PM PDT by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: Wphile; SuziQ
Yes I'm sorry my mistake.
133 posted on 04/23/2002 4:55:24 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Yes, I figured it would be. That's why I brought it up! Oh, and guess what? Women were wrong about that too. We really do prefer the manly types.

The sensitive ones are all Dems.

134 posted on 04/23/2002 4:55:29 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
I agree.
135 posted on 04/23/2002 4:56:57 PM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
Men who aren't afraid to love aren't being "sensitive"... they're giving into higher functions than sexual attraction.

Sensitivity is lying at a screening of the Titanic with your girlfriend... "Boo hoo! Leo died!" instead of cheering.

136 posted on 04/23/2002 4:57:16 PM PDT by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
I am there already. It is too late for me WPhile LOL.
137 posted on 04/23/2002 5:00:42 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Nakatu X
NX, I appreciate young people like you so much, you can't know.

Remember that I have a son 24, daughter 22 and another daughter who's twenty (she'll be 21 later this year). I love them so very much, and hate the difficulties they're going through as a result of poor choices they've made.

We tried to teach them correct principles, but in the end they must govern themselves, and my daughters in particular have made some bad decisions in the process.

My 22 year old just broke up with the guy with whom she'd been "shacking up" for about the last two years. She, too, was very cynical about the idea of marriage and she told herself that it was better this way.

Then she began to realize how much is missing when the commitment is not there.

I could go on, but suffice it to say that you are doing yourself the biggest favor I think you could do. You aren't missing out on anything, and you and your husband will realize the power of your decision some day, mark my words.

If you have a chance (and assuming it is playing where you live) try and catch the little, low-budget indie film The Other Side of Heaven if you can. It stars Christopher Gorham (Party of Five, Felicity) and Anne Hathaway (The Princess Diaries) and is about a young couple, very much in love, who decide to wait while the young man serves an LDS church mission in Tonga.

Much of the film deals with their communications back and forth, and how they had the strength (and the commitment) to be 3,000 miles apart for 30 months during which time the young man nearly loses his life to the dangers of living in that remote place.

I think you'll come away with a great appreciation of what true love and commitment really are.

In the meantime, NEVER stop being your beautiful self, kiddo.

138 posted on 04/23/2002 5:01:10 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Wphile
On that I agree wholeheartedly.
139 posted on 04/23/2002 5:01:50 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: weikel
That may be, but I'm afraid Gens X and Y have been mightily shortchanged, and not just by Democrats. I seem to have read not long ago, that conservative Christians are more likely to divorce than liberal agnostics.

There's a message there somewhere.

140 posted on 04/23/2002 5:03:17 PM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-148 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson