Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: amused
I believe it should be a state issue unless an amendment to the US constitution is passed.

You're so intent on condescending that you don't recognise your own hypocrisy staring you in the face. :-}

According to Mr Amused, the right to life is not an unalienable right and thus subject to federalism while the right of pedophiles to virtual child pornography is an unalienable right and thus not subject to the tenth amendment.

Up is down, right is left, black is white. Yo comprendo.

83 posted on 04/24/2002 9:11:58 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07
I believe it should be a state issue unless an amendment to the US constitution is passed.

You're so intent on condescending that you don't recognise your own hypocrisy staring you in the face. :-}

I like a good sense of humor.

According to Mr Amused, the right to life is not an unalienable right and thus subject to federalism while the right of pedophiles to virtual child pornography is an unalienable right and thus not subject to the tenth amendment.

Ya got me, I don't believe thought should be criminalized by the gov't, state or fed. But that goes for all thoughts the good and the bad. And I believe states should be able to decide whether to ban abortion. If enough states ban it and band together, there's possibility for an amendment. I just don't see getting it done by an act of Congress.

Up is down, right is left, black is white. Yo comprendo.

94 posted on 04/24/2002 10:09:23 PM PDT by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson