Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fed Probe Targets Hillary
NewsMax.com ^ | 4/28/02 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 04/28/2002 2:42:33 PM PDT by kattracks

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: MotleyGirl70
HITLERY's response to these allegations:

"I don't recall."

21 posted on 04/28/2002 3:56:59 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Lucky2
I'm not goingnto get my hopes up, as history has shown that the only thing that seems to stick to Hillary!! is her crusty old black pantsuit....
22 posted on 04/28/2002 4:12:46 PM PDT by tracer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Exactly what kind of "Target" - a bullseye painted on her ample rump?

Whatever you do, please don't, I repeat, don't think of "probing" this "target".

23 posted on 04/28/2002 4:30:13 PM PDT by Stallone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Fed Probe Targets Hillary


24 posted on 04/28/2002 4:37:49 PM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Y-y-y-y-y-awnnnn !

Targeting Hillary with a federal probe is like trying to hit a mosquito with quad .50 's from a bouncing truck : a good way to gain attention-and burn up money !

You know, I know, everyone knows she is crookeder 'n a dawg's hind laig; but she's also slicker 'n goose sh**;and to paraphrase the Bible : " A thousand may fall at her right hand; ten thousand at her left; but it shall not come anywhere "nigh" unto Hillary."

25 posted on 04/28/2002 4:43:03 PM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yawn......................
26 posted on 04/28/2002 4:45:19 PM PDT by b4its2late
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Yeah, yeah, yeah. We've all heard it before. When all the witnesses take the 5th, commit arkancide, or go on vacation in China, the prosecutors and the media will say there is no credible evidence to put the wicked witch in the hoosegow.
27 posted on 04/28/2002 4:46:33 PM PDT by MistrX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Related article:

FEDS PROBING HILL
By AL GUART

April 28, 2002 -- EXCLUSIVE

Senior Justice Department officials have traveled to Brazil twice to interview runaway business- man Peter F. Paul about his financial dealings with Bill and Hillary Clinton, The Post has learned.

Paul, 52, claimed Hillary Clinton's campaign for Senate in 2000 reported on federal election records only about $500,000 of the $1.9 million he laid out for a lavish, star-studded fund-raiser in Hollywood on Aug. 12, 2000.

Documents obtained by The Post show Justice officials flew to Sao Paulo for two days last August, and returned for two more days last October to question Paul, a convicted felon in prison there fighting extradition to the United States to answer charges arising from his failed business venture with Stan Lee, the creator of the Spider-Man comic-book character.

Sources told The Post the feds offered Paul a deal in which he would plead guilty to outstanding federal charges in New York and California and become a "cooperating witness" into Clinton fund-raising and "other matters."

As first reported by Post columnist Robert Novak last year, Paul has told investigators he covered the $1.9 million cost of the Hollywood fund-raiser as part of a plan to get Bill Clinton to raise the profile of Stan Lee Media, which at the time owned the Spider-Man rights and wanted to use the character in a worldwide marketing scheme.

When that proposal fell through, Paul approached a Democratic National Committee official about the possibility of a presidential pardon for his past crimes from then-President Clinton, sources said. He was not pardoned.

Paul, who received handwritten letters of thanks from both Clintons after the fund-raiser, later filed a lawsuit to recoup his alleged outlays for the Hollywood event. The suit was dismissed last year, because Paul was a fugitive, but could be re-filed if he returns to the United States.

Paul's lawyer, Larry Klayman, a founder of Judicial Watch - an organization that has filed numerous lawsuits against the Clintons - said "Mrs. Clinton should be significantly worried about this, especially since the Justice Department said everything Peter told them is checking out."

Robin Johansen, a lawyer for the Clintons, called Paul's claims "ludicrous."

Paul's Hollywood event, dubbed the "Bill Clinton Farewell Tribute" but in fact a fund-raiser for the outgoing president's wife, featured performances by Cher, Diana Ross and Melissa Etheridge. It netted $1.5 million for Hillary's Senate bid, according to Paul's lawsuit.

Justice Department spokeswoman Jill Stillman declined comment on the case.

Source: http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/46612.htm

28 posted on 04/28/2002 4:52:42 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: In_My_Humble_Opinion

Investigating the Clintons for fraud and corruption is never a waste of taxpayer money. It is a civic duty to investigate all Maoist crooks in government.

29 posted on 04/28/2002 4:56:08 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Investigating the Clintons for fraud and corruption is never a waste of taxpayer money.....

In these trying economic times, at least it's steady work.

30 posted on 04/28/2002 5:03:33 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
This administration would not even admit originally the destruction carried out at the White House and Old Executive Office Bldg by the Dems. And how many times have the Clintonistas been investigated; then some political hack let them off the hook. I believe that will happen again. Hope I am wrong but I won't be.
31 posted on 04/28/2002 5:04:46 PM PDT by LaGrone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Notice to all lurking Klintonistas:
Maybe this time the stink will stick!
32 posted on 04/28/2002 5:17:33 PM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
"Investigating the Clintons for fraud and corruption is never a waste of taxpayer money..... In these trying economic times, at least it's steady work."

LOL

33 posted on 04/28/2002 6:31:22 PM PDT by friendly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
As if anyone will do anything to Bonnie and Clyde Clinton, the crime couple who has captured the imagination of the dumbed down populace.
They would cheer for them if they were videoed committing murder, ala OJ!
34 posted on 04/28/2002 6:34:58 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
The title caused a bad visual in my head........
Pictures of a large Bull Dyke banker with a strap on.... ;-(
35 posted on 04/28/2002 6:41:47 PM PDT by HP8753
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Unless the funds were diverted to personal use why would she not have reported the contributions to her campaign? If she did divert funds, this is something the American People will understand. It is called theft and tax evasion.
36 posted on 04/28/2002 7:21:56 PM PDT by cpdiii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Paul's lawyer, the Judicial Watch’s Larry Klayman told the Post that "Mrs. Clinton should be significantly worried about this, especially since the Justice Department said everything Peter told them is checking out."

As usual, Klayman is hunting water buffalo with a BB gun and sounding tough. He better have terrific aim, and even better luck.

37 posted on 04/28/2002 7:26:32 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
As usual, Klayman is hunting water buffalo with a BB gun and sounding tough.

I don't think Klaymen will ever live down the fact that the biggest crimminals in Washington got away. It sort of makes his message null and void.

38 posted on 04/28/2002 8:59:51 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: backhoe
Thanks for all the links, backhoe. You have all the good ones!
39 posted on 04/28/2002 9:24:23 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
Thanks, it's just a small sample... or as I used to put it, "The tip of a very large iceberg of corruption, floating in an ocean of slime...."
40 posted on 04/29/2002 2:05:32 AM PDT by backhoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson