Each apparently with a combo platter of conflicting and unsubstantiated theories. Hardly a modicum of hard fact in any of them. Whereas the government sources denying the spy aspect are reliable and named.
No Proof! Inneundo! Hearsay! Let's move on...and do the Lanny Davis Cha-Cha-Cha!
It is the categorical denials which makes this story fascinating. The Clinton excuses. The curious fact that a group of people on FR denied this was true from day one before they could know what happened. The same people who now have zero interest in examining this story but resort to blanket denials and claims this is "tin-foil hat" stuff or motivated by antisemitism.