Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Bush didn't know: Hugh Hewitt catches elite media asking the wrong question
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, May 22, 2002 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 05/22/2002 12:23:23 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

As usual, the elite media is asking the wrong question. Much more interesting than what Bush knew is what Bush didn't know. The list is long.

Bush didn't know that the leadership of the Democratic Party could never be expected to sacrifice its political interest to the national interest, not even after the slaughter of thousands of Americans and the beginning of war.

Bush didn't know that every few weeks a Democratic leader would launch an assault on his conduct of the war in the hopes of nicking the president's huge standing with the public. Whether Biden's "mano-a-mano" laugher, Daschle's "no exit strategy," or Hillary's and Gephardt's bald charges of last week, Bush clearly has been surprised by the McKinney Democrats.

Bush didn't know that, even though the confirmation of his deputy attorney general was stalled by the Senate until May 10, the confirmation of his assistant attorney general for the Criminal Division until June 14, and the confirmation of his commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service until July 31, that he would be blamed for not having cleaned up the mess at Justice in time to prevent 9-11.

Bush didn't know that Robert Mueller, confirmed as director of the FBI on Aug. 2, would get the heat for FBI fumbling instead of Louis Freeh, whose last day as director was June 30.

Bush didn't know that the Beltway punditry, now so eager to label him as inattentive, would collectively forget their fascination with Chandra Levy and Jim Jeffords. Bush didn't know that, even now, when "focus" is so highly valued by the sideline second-guessers, no one is asking whether Jeffords may have been a little too self-absorbed for the country's good. Bush didn't realize that a media that covered for the Gore-Lieberman attempt to strip the votes from the military serving overseas would turn a blind eye to the chaos in the intelligence community created in the locust years of Clinton-Gore.

Bush didn't know that the country's "leading" newspaper would not think twice about headlining a columnist who questioned his courage, as Maureen Dowd did when, in writing about the use of a photo from 9-11 for fundraising she penned: "Fortunately for the Republicans, it's a photo and not a video. Otherwise we might hear the president nervously inquiring of his adult supervisor, 'Hey, Dick, is it safe to come home yet?'" Did the Times, during World War II, wonder aloud about FDR's cloaking his travels to meet with Churchill and Stalin? After Kennedy's assassination, did the Times feature second-guessings about LBJ's every move?

Bush didn't know that Newsweek's Howard Fineman was not only a partisan hack, but also clairvoyant. Fineman's assertions on Hardball on May 16 that the president was not completely surprised by 9-11 because he had been warned by the CIA, and because his jaw did not drop when told of the attack, represent a new low for "journalism" that Bush clearly did not anticipate.

Bush didn't know that his decision to keep George Tenet as head of the CIA in January would not be remembered as an act of continuity and bipartisanship, or that his refusal to fire the Clinton holdover post 9-11 would not be credited as a refusal to scapegoat the previous administration. Bush is clearly surprised at the Democrats' willingness to heap scorn on the FBI and CIA of Clinton's creating even as they try and finger Bush for those agencies' failures.

And Bush is quite obviously taken aback by the Jerry Nadlers of the world, whose own quite obvious internal demons allow them to voice the idea that the country needs to investigate whether a president of the United States would not have acted to prevent the massacre of thousands.

Bush didn't know that Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney was not only not around the bend, but that she was an opinion leader of the Democrats. And Bush didn't know that straight-faced Democrats and their buddies in the Beltway media would send up a chorus of demands for a new "commission" to review intelligence failures, even as Democratic staffers leaked the documents the already launched investigation had unfortunately placed in their hands.

Bush didn't know that there are two kinds of conservatives – loyal conservatives and ratings-driven conservatives, and that the former aren't very skilled at combating the Beltway machine and the latter don't want to.

Bush didn't know that many Republicans couldn't tell the difference between a steel tariff and a JDAM, or the difference between a wheat subsidy and the dispatch of special forces to the Philippines and Georgia.

Bush didn't anticipate how quickly a country as spoiled as ours could will 9-11 into the memory hole.

Bush didn't foresee the cravenness of the commenting class, or the capacity of Tom Daschle to be both Iago and Cassius at the same time. Bush couldn't imagine a Patrick Leahy lying or (and forgive him here, no one could see this coming) a Hillary Clinton demanding answers from the White House.

Bush did not know that a Senate that could not understand what the meaning of "is" is, could never understand what the meaning of "war" was.

In short and in summary, President Bush was wholly unprepared for the decadence of D.C. as he found it in 2001.

But then again, so was I, and so apparently are the vast, vast majority of the American people. President Bush has found it prudent to disguise his disgust, but there is no reason why the electorate should. The reckoning is in November, and there is little that Dowd, Fineman et al can do about that.




TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Wednesday, May 22, 2002

Quote of the Day by SICSEMPERTYRANNUS

1 posted on 05/22/2002 12:23:23 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AuntB;nunya bidness;GrandmaC;Washington_minuteman;buffyt;Grampa Dave;Jolly Rodgers;blackie...

Hugh Hewitt MEGA PING!


2 posted on 05/22/2002 12:24:21 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Ditto ping!
3 posted on 05/22/2002 12:29:23 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Great article; as always .
4 posted on 05/22/2002 12:30:46 AM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
MAKE THE USA SAFE FOR al Qeada TERRORISTS!

ELECT MORE SOCIALIST BASTARDS LIKE DA$$HOLE, CLINTOON, GEPHARDLESS, LEAKY LEAHY, BIDEN, DODD AND KENNEDY, THIS NOVEMBER!

5 posted on 05/22/2002 12:31:34 AM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
I don't have the words to express what a slam dunk this article is.
6 posted on 05/22/2002 12:31:59 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
that was an amazing article. I think we have our congressional election strategy.
7 posted on 05/22/2002 12:32:09 AM PDT by Gracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You've got Mail! =^)
8 posted on 05/22/2002 12:32:19 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
You nailed it, Grampa.
9 posted on 05/22/2002 12:32:53 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Comment #10 Removed by Moderator

To: Texasforever
Hugh Hewitt always hits out of the park. For insightful, no-holds-barred analysis, you won't find a better writer than Hewitt.
11 posted on 05/22/2002 12:35:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
bttt
all of my frustation in a nutshell
12 posted on 05/22/2002 12:35:47 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"And Bush didn't know that straight-faced Democrats and their buddies in the Beltway media would send up a chorus of demands for a new "commission" to review intelligence failures, even as Democratic staffers leaked the documents the already launched investigation had unfortunately placed in their hands"

Unbelievable.

13 posted on 05/22/2002 12:41:02 AM PDT by Aim small miss small
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Aim small miss small
Dems -- despicable, as always.
14 posted on 05/22/2002 12:50:25 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hugh, a masterpiece!
15 posted on 05/22/2002 1:53:03 AM PDT by Russell Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Russell Scott
Bump!
16 posted on 05/22/2002 1:54:33 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Hi King of Ping.


17 posted on 05/22/2002 2:21:38 AM PDT by Snow Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
"Elect more Socialists"

Why? When we got guys, like Bush and his people doing the Socialists' dirty work. (Look at the recently passed farm bill; Campaign finance; Office of Home Security (what a joke!); Not allowing Pilots to carry in the cockpit; and the list goes on and on and on.....Just to be safe for the elections. The Republicrats are in trouble.

18 posted on 05/22/2002 2:32:22 AM PDT by rambo316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
In short and in summary, President Bush was wholly unprepared for the decadence of D.C. as he found it in 2001.
Apologetics in action people! This article sounds as bad as the Democrats calling the President stupid or illiterate, only this article makes him sound naive, which he is not, not by a long shot! Nor are the people around him.
The President has been in, or associated with, politics and politicians for a considerable part of his life and now this article comes out making G. W. sound like the very thing Dowd insinuated he was.
This article is a great disservice to the President and anyone who praises Hugh Hewitt for it is foolish and naive in their own right and Hugh should be ashamed of practicing the known Dem tactic of apologetics!
19 posted on 05/22/2002 3:31:22 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
And before anyone begins their harangue on me let me state that as of today I'll still take a bullet for the man.
Bill Clinton? Excuse me, while I take one step to the right.
My trust is still in him. The future is always an unknown.
20 posted on 05/22/2002 3:37:50 AM PDT by philman_36
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson