To: Alan Chapman
RE:"I've weighed the civil liberties issues against the needs for us as a state to be prepared, and I think I will sign," Bush said.
Translation: "You are all cattle."
3 posted on
05/28/2002 11:11:39 AM PDT by
tomakaze
To: Alan Chapman
It's a shame that this thread has not generated more response. Of course, there IS a Bush involved.
8 posted on
05/28/2002 2:33:32 PM PDT by
rdavis84
To: Alan Chapman
The sky is falling! The sky is falling! Here comes all the chicken littles crying about our repressive government. My family will be glad to take our injections. The rest of you can die if you want to.
To: Alan Chapman
I agree that they should not be forced to have injections. Just shot on sight if they are infected and wandering around in public because they exercised their right to endanger everyone else.
To: Alan Chapman
The law would allow officials under certain conditions to quarantine and require vaccinations despite a person's health or religious concerns. Hmmm. I would like to know where the vaccinations are derived from. If they're derived from the same source as these vaccines...then I have a problem. Do you know who develops the anthrax vaccine?
14 posted on
05/28/2002 7:37:14 PM PDT by
JMJ333
To: Alan Chapman
The idea of forced vaccinations is abhorent to Free men. This legislation is just another step towards a global police state.
I might take this "vaccinations" crap seriously when the following three events occur:
1) Our borders are secured
2) Non-citizens from Muslim nations are kicked out
3) A clear policy is put in place to use nuclear weapons against anyone who attacks the USA with biological, nuclear, or chemical weapons.
22 posted on
05/28/2002 8:08:17 PM PDT by
Mulder
To: Alan Chapman
I think it depends on the disease and the quality of the vaccine. For instance, I don't believe anthrax normally spreads from one person to another, so the risk would mainly be to the victim, not those around him. In addition, the anthrax vaccine provided by Bioport was very, very questionable stuff. So it can be argued that anthrax vaccine should not be mandatory, at least in the present state of the art.
Smallpox is another matter. If the risk is only 1 in 100,000 that the vaccine will harm the patient, then it would be reasonable to make it mandatory, because smallpox spreads so quickly from one person to another that many lives would be saved.
Whether or not government bureaucrats can be trusted to make these kinds of practical distinctions is another matter, especially since public health departments have been corrupted by their involvement in "reproductive health" and other bogus activities. More likely, they would force vaccinations from whatever company gave them the largest campaign contributions.
25 posted on
05/28/2002 8:54:45 PM PDT by
Cicero
To: Black Agnes
FYI...
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson