Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oil Giant 'Guilty' of Crimes against Humanity, Protestors Say
CNSNEWS.com ^ | 5/29/02 | Marc Morano

Posted on 05/29/2002 4:14:26 AM PDT by kattracks

CNSNews.com) Dallas - Anti-corporate protesters "convicted" ExxonMobil of "crimes against humanity" Tuesday, in a mock trial held on the eve of the oil giant's annual shareholders' meeting in Dallas.

During the mock trial, protestors compared the company's business practices to those of the Nazis.

The group that staged the "Exxon Mobil Crimes Against Humanity Trial" also plans to rally outside the shareholders' meeting on Wednesday, expressing their anti-corporate sentiments with banners and "street theater."

But one civil right activist who wanted to defend ExxonMobil at the mock trial says he was shut out of the proceeding. He called the protestors anarchists, socialists, and communists of the 1960s variety.

'Rape, Pillage, Plunder, Murder'

The mock trial of ExxonMobil, held at the University of Texas in Dallas, found the company guilty of crimes against humanity for its oil production and exploration in the developing world, including the African nations of Chad and Cameroon.

David Cobb, a Green Party candidate for Texas Attorney General, acted as the mock trial's prosecutor. He accused ExxonMobil of "rape, pillage, plunder and murder" in its dealings with the developing world.

Cobb described ExxonMobil as a company that makes sure "all human opposition to its operations is brutally oppressed."

He compared the oil giant to Adolf Hitler's Nazi party. "Just as the Nazi party had to take over the democratically elected government in Germany to achieve its goals, so too did ExxonMobil take over aspects of our democratically elected government to achieve its ends."

As evidence of the company's repressive nature, Cobb introduced a series of witnesses from foreign countries where ExxonMobil operates refineries. The witnesses, some accompanied by translators, accused ExxonMobil of turning a blind eye to human rights abuses carried out by repressive governments in countries where ExxonMobil conducts business.

One witness, Cut Zahara of Aceh, an Indonesian province, lamented the cultural effects of international development. She explained how painful it was to "watch the children of ExxonMobil play in luxury surroundings, while we the poor villagers had to live around this kind of environment and grow up watching such stark inequality."

'Climate Crimes'

The mock trial also found ExxonMobil guilty of "deliberately deceiving the public by manipulating and misrepresenting solid science on global warming."

In his mock trial summary, "prosecutor" Cobb said the company was guilty of "climate crimes" and was "willing to do anything to exploit nature and oppress other human beings to maximize its profits."

The mock trial also convicted ExxonMobil of environmental racism for allegedly selecting minority areas to locate its oil refineries. Cobb accused ExxonMobil of employing a "ravaging racist policy."

After a brief deliberation, the three-judge panel ruled the company was guilty as charged of "crimes against humanity." The crowd of about 75 protestors erupted in applause and cheers.

The mock judges sentenced ExxonMobil to be broken up into fifty small companies. "All oil and natural gas exploration shall cease, effective today," the judges ruled.

They also stipulated that ExxonMobil spend its $6 billion in assets on "community restoration," "clean air," and funding for "climate-change education." The crowd greeted the sentence with a standing ovation.

Andy Asmus of the anti-corporate protest group Pressure Point told CNSNews.com , "the purpose of this trial is to raise public awareness of crimes that ExxonMobil continues to commit against the people of the developing world and in our own country."

Asmus said he would like to see ExxonMobil's corporate charter revoked. The company did not respond to an invitation to defend itself at the trial, according to Asmus.

Anarachists?

Niger Innis, national spokesman for the Congress of Racial Equality, said he was not impressed by the mock trial. He called the protesters remnants of "the anarchists, socialists, communist types of the 1960's."

Innis said he asked the mock trial's organizers to let him testify on ExxonMobil's behalf, but the request was rebuffed. "They told me the mock trial was scripted already. Apparently I did not fit the script."

The participants in the mock trial are misguided and "arrogant" for opposing economic growth in the developing world, according to Innis.

"It's a pretty arrogant message coming from folk who are from Europe or the U.S. -- both first-class, first-world countries where people are economically comfortable for the most part -- to say to the Third World, 'No you don't have the right to develop the way we have for centuries,'" he said.

Mentioning several ExxonMobil projects currently under way in Africa, Innis said development is the key to bringing a better quality of life to that continent. "There is a crisis in Africa right now in terms of clean water and sanitation," Innis said.

"There is another side to the human rights struggle," he added. And that is "making sure countries in the Third World are not permanently mired in the Third World."

E-mail a news tip to Marc Morano.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.

 



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 05/29/2002 4:14:27 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Attack Of The Socialist".
2 posted on 05/29/2002 5:26:33 AM PDT by Piquaboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
'Mock trial' indeed. That propoganda performance deserves mockery as do all the idiots who take such nonsense seriously.
3 posted on 05/29/2002 5:37:56 AM PDT by JAWs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm going to email this to my buddies who work at Exxon. They are going to laugh their butts off.
4 posted on 05/29/2002 5:57:35 AM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ms. Anti-feminazi
MAF - how'd the Freep go yesterday? I was looking for a thread and came across this article.
5 posted on 05/29/2002 6:24:23 AM PDT by Alissa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Maybe the right should hold "Mock Judicial Nominee Confirmation Trials" where we we all dress up as members of the Confirmation Committee and vote the way reasonable people would vote.

These leftist are such morons.

6 posted on 05/29/2002 6:30:05 AM PDT by diotima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diotima
The scary part is the fact that these idiots will be petitioning the ICC to try corporate executives for 'crimes against humanity'.
7 posted on 05/29/2002 7:27:57 AM PDT by Black Agnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Kind of reminds you of the inquisitions from the dark ages doesn't it?
8 posted on 05/29/2002 7:35:35 AM PDT by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Anti-corporate protesters

Pluck...My...Shick, you bustards.

prisoner6

9 posted on 05/29/2002 8:05:08 AM PDT by prisoner6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"All oil and natural gas exploration shall cease, effective today," the judges ruled.

... then they got into their gas-guzzling SUV's/VW's and drove to their neighborhood 7-11, buying up all manner of plastic covered goodies made from petroleum products, went home and switched on every light in their place (1 person in 5 rooms), consuming electricity that appears by magic (certainly not petroleum products), flipped on their boob tubes (consuming even more magical electricity), went to bed where they turned on the heaters in their water beds to full, and the AC to full before they went to sleep, considering the days work well done.

Godspeed

10 posted on 05/29/2002 8:46:05 AM PDT by America's Resolve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: kattracks
Wonder how those protestors got to the location? You don't suppost they DROVE, do you? (And I'll bet they weren't driving compacts, either.) What a bunch of hypocrites.
12 posted on 05/29/2002 9:58:06 AM PDT by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dark Nerd
I wonder what would have happened if ExxonMobil had actually offered to defend itself? Doesn't sound like that's in the script.

I guess they were banking on EM's refusal; perhaps EM should have called their bluff?

D

13 posted on 05/29/2002 9:08:57 PM PDT by daviddennis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson