Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Religious Shrine at Ground Zero? (Why not a mosque, a church and a synagogue?)
The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership ^ | unknown | Daniel S. Brenner

Posted on 06/01/2002 10:25:49 AM PDT by LarryLied

A serious and inclusive discussion of the future of the Ground Zero site is now underway. The Civic Alliance to Rebuild Downtown New York is in the midst of conducting an important series of open public meetings on various aspects of the planning process. From the sidelines I’ve been following this conversation and have been keeping a close eye on the growing list of proposals by architects, urban planners, and others offering up cultural centers, art spaces, memorial parks and business complexes.

What is conspicuously absent from these proposals is any attention to religious needs that might be associated with the site. Even the discussion of the victims’ memorial that is to be erected as part of any rebuilding plan for the site, has been framed in essentially secular terms. No proposals even for the quiet, understated ecumenical chapels one finds in hospitals. As one of the many chaplains who witnessed the events of the 11th, and volunteered with many other clergy to help deal with some of the spiritual and emotional crises that followed, I’m wondering -- Why has religion suddenly been thrust to the sidelines?

Religious groups and organizations were among the first to respond to the attack. Moreover, in the days following the attack, Americans flocked to their synagogues, churches and mosques in record numbers. I will never forget watching the televised services held at the National Cathedral and Riverside Church, both powerful expressions of our collective sense of grief and hope.

But while those services were articulations of America’s common spirit, they also spoke to our religious particularities. As an American I listened intently to all the clergy who spoke, but as a Jew, I cared most about what the rabbis had to say. I imagine that this was the case for Catholics, Protestants, Muslims, and Buddhists, all who were represented in those services. America is great because we not only allow for the freedom of religion, but we have a public square that can encourage our religious diversity at the right moments.

For this reason, I would ask, why not build a mosque at ground zero? And a church, and a synagogue as well? Why not erect a vast inter-religious center on the premises as a supplement to the secular, cultural, and artistic elements that will figure in the blueprint for the site’s reconstruction? An inter-religious center could serve for educational purposes, and the religiously specific chapels could be used for baptisms, confirmation ceremonies, bar and bat mitzvahs, and even weddings of those whose parents or loved ones have perished in the attacks. It would be a site of healing for many. And just imagine what it would be like for American Muslims, and Muslim visitors from abroad to visit such a shrine.

Building a mosque on the site would also send a message to the Islamic world about America, and our commitment to the freedom of religion. At a time when many Muslims are being fed endless distortions about America and what we value, it will take more than a publicity mission by Muhammad Ali to change America’s image.

What traditional religious adherents in the Islamic world, and elsewhere fail to comprehend is the great irony of American church-state separation: The more secular the state, the more religious the nation. In America, religious faith is freely chosen and religious communities are strong. In an increasingly diverse world, America may hold the model that the world needs.

But would building an inter-religious center at Ground Zero help?

Maybe a few misguided Muslims would go there to praise Allah for his great victory in destroying the towers - but I imagine the vast majority of American Muslims would go to simply offer prayers of gratitude that Allah, in his mercy, has created a place called America, where both freedom and faith can flourish.

The perception of America’s role in the world is being redefined. In addition to being regarded as an economic and military power, we are now seen as a global police force attempting to root out terror. But America is a spiritual power as well and it is important that we do what we can to get this message out. Building an inter-religious center on the site of the World Trade Center could be an important step in this direction. It would be a living testimony to the American conviction that secularity and diversity are not the enemies of faith, but are rather the very basis of spiritual strength and religious renewal.

To read additional articles by Daniel Brenner, click here


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: New York
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last
Comment #81 Removed by Moderator

To: watchin
but I imagine the vast majority of American Muslims would go to simply offer prayers of gratitude that Allah, in his mercy, has created a place called America, where both freedom and faith can flourish.

This guy has got to be kidding, right?

82 posted on 06/01/2002 10:40:34 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Comment #83 Removed by Moderator

To: weikel
Larry this is the dumbest thing you ever posted the only thing that should be built at ground zero is a bigger WTC.

Aw...come on. I've posted stuff with no redeeming social value what-so-ever. This essay does give an insight into a certain mindset found in the New York area. This Rabbi is not alone in his thoughts. Bet Rev. Campbell and other lefties love the idea.

84 posted on 06/01/2002 11:06:28 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Well the left hates religion( I'm of mixed opinions its useful to ensure morality among people but promotes irrational thinking) but they want to destroy America by any means neccasary they are between a rock in a hard place.
85 posted on 06/01/2002 11:09:58 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: weikel
I disagree 100% about religion promoting irrational thinking. Just the opposite. True faith is humble and knows its limitations. Those who are irrational are the secularists who think they are the center of the universe. Some nuts do find a home in religion but egoism is not what western faith is all about. Secular humanism, on the other hand is totally egocentric. That would be OK if SH'ers were Buddhist-like and mainly concerned with themselves. But they are not. They have plans. Lots of plans. For others. They view the world from a God-like plane and are determined to fix the flaws in creation. No matter who suffers.
86 posted on 06/01/2002 11:37:26 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Buddhism is the most rational of religions in its pure form. Buddha actually said that he didn't like faith( blind belief in the impossible or extremely improbable) I'm a deist I believe the universe must have an eternal "uncaused cause" and I don't think I'm the center of the universe.
87 posted on 06/01/2002 11:44:32 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
If they build a friggin mosque at ground zero...

I believe there are a great many Americans [myself included] who will say: "I'll blow it up myself".

88 posted on 06/01/2002 11:50:21 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weikel
Buddhism is the most rational of religions in its pure form.

Nothing rational in seeking to extinguish one's own consciousness.

89 posted on 06/01/2002 11:57:40 PM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

Comment #90 Removed by Moderator

To: Cicero; Siobhan; Larry Lied
Jesus conquered through the cross. Mohammed conquered with a sword. There's a fundamental difference in these religions.

Cicero is correct. To erect a Mosque serves only to discredit the lives who perished. Do you recall that Arafat did not say word one when the crash into the WTC occurred?

91 posted on 06/02/2002 5:46:22 AM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Harrison Bergeron
Excellent commentary, and quite true.
92 posted on 06/02/2002 5:51:24 AM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
You have made a mistake by using the Red Cross as an example. They are thieves.
93 posted on 06/02/2002 5:55:30 AM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
I wondered if the "Red Cross Spiritual Care Coordinator" really told ministers at Ground Zero "Remember, no praying in the name of Jesus!”
94 posted on 06/02/2002 6:13:39 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I seriously doubt it. The Red Cross never purports any spiritual goals. It is all about money.
95 posted on 06/02/2002 6:51:24 AM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Why not a monolith for each religion with the symbol of the religion at the top and the names of all that perished from that religion written thereon. Plain, simple, no one get left out.
96 posted on 06/02/2002 6:57:25 AM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
That is why I think the Red Cross did tell ministers not to mention Jesus when they were comforting the victims of 9/11.

Despite his liberalism, I doubt the Rabbi who wrote this article would make it up.

97 posted on 06/02/2002 7:27:42 AM PDT by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
I wish he was kidding. I think he's really that stupid.
98 posted on 06/02/2002 7:40:42 AM PDT by watchin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
You put a mosque on this site and all hell will break loose!!! I can not believe anybody could have been so stupid to come up with this idea. I do not drive by a single mosque whithout pure disqust welling up in me anymore. Puting one there would be like throwing a match on gasoline.
99 posted on 06/02/2002 7:45:44 AM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
I've always sorta thought nirvana meant a static blissful state rather than total oblivion.
100 posted on 06/02/2002 1:33:44 PM PDT by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson