BUSH DISMISSES ADMINISTRATION REPORT ON 'WARMING'

Drudge ^ | Drudge

[CoolGuyVic]

"'I read the report put out by the bureaucracy,' Bush said dismissivly... "

More to come, I'm sure

[ladyinred]

You guys win.

Thanks Laz.

[Howlin]

Sometimes I think we "hear too much," if you know what I mean. We hear stuff on here so early on that when it finaly makes the "regular" news, I'm like, "Huh, that's old!"

[BillofRights]

Gee calling us Socialist now .. Isn't that just special...

Mo, you either misquote me or misinterpret my point almost every time we correspond. I did NOT call you a socialist!!

Here's what I wrote:

"...Maybe you agree with big government and progressive income taxes. Maybe most Americans do. That's okay, but if you do, at least admit that you are a socialist..."

I wrote, "....MAYBE ....IF....THEN...."

That is NOT calling you a socialist!

[Howlin]

Did you read the report? The second item you just posted is IN the report.

[Mo1]

Well Gosh Golly Gee another history lesson ..

What makes you think I am not aware that we are over taxed .. you really think I enjoy paying taxes ..

That was not my question .. the question was how do you expect to get rid of it all.. by just snapping your fingers??

A wave of the pen and everything is all better and we are back to living like they did in 1776

All I keep hearing is attacks on Bush because he doesn't do what you want him to do and when you want it done

Seems to me that some are not interested in a President they are interested in having a Dictator

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm .. somehow I think that is the very thing Our Founding Father wanted to avoid when they wrote the Constitution

I'm am not saying this country is perfect and that there is no room for improvements ..

But I will say I think Our Founding Fathers would be rolling in their graves at some of the talk I have been seeing around here the last few days

[eraser X]

Hmm, looks like they're still defending the report even though Bush distanced himself from it. I can only figure this has more to do with their hate for Rush than what has actually transpired.

[Grampa Dave]

Weren't those pictures incredible?

In spite of his so called apology for carrying the insult of the NY Slimes, Rush had this picture of GW morphing into Gore before this past week's insults.

There is a definite malignant regression with his arrogance.

Makes you wonder if he is burnt out and wants out of the business. If he turns away his audience and loses sponsors, then he can quit. The old, I'm too proud to quit, so I'll make you fire me routine.

[PeaceBeWithYou]

Please provide biblical verses on global warming.

Genesis 8:22(after Noah built the alter)
As long as the Earth endures,
seedtime and harvest,
cold and heat,
summer and winter,
day and night,
will never cease.

More commas than the 2nd Amendment, but just as plain.

[Texasforever]

It did not conflict with any position Bush has taken either as president or candidate. You have no way out. I would suggest you drop it. You are now just appearing petulant.

[Howlin]

So the fact that the EPA acknowledged that humans had some effect on Global Warming was not enough to say that the Bush Administration caved on the issue?

I wish you had just seen Britt Hume's show; they just discussed this.

Mara Liasson, of PBS fame, just was LAUGHING at the way Bush sneered at the BUREAUCRACY......she said there was NO DOUBT he didn't approve of this report, period. Just in case you don't know, there aren't many people more liberal than she is.

[Captain Beyond]

Look it was a statement of fact to introduce myself to Concerned About Politics. Besides hermetically sealing the original cookie in an envelope and sticking it in my freezer from the first time I viewed the FR web page and then producing it is the only proof I could use to "validate" it for you.

As for a routine I have no idea what you are talking about. The front page says jump right in. I did not know I had to check in with a posting thread guard to make sure I was not a member of some cabal or see if I could really swim before jumping into the pool ;-).

So I decided after three years to do it. What is your problem?

It seems to me FR was all about freedom. I found it pretty dishearten when points of debate about policy (read FR purpose statement) was being lost to nothing more than flaming threads that read "I'm a real supporter of Bush and your are not ..." or "Bush the rino blah, blah blah...). Right now Rush is putting stuff out there to make you think about the coming election. If your are going to convert someone to your cause then one has to know why and what they believe in before one can sell someone else on a good reason to vote republican. The coming elections will not be about if you support Bush or not. When it comes to Representatives and Senators it will be about issues. But here lately it seems you have to have certain opinion to be right or as in your case one must alleviate some dreaded auspice of suspicion before they post. Then there is ever ubiquitous born on dating routine. Geeezzzzee. So yes June 3, 2002 is when I first logged in. Your Point?

[Grampa Dave]

Yes, this is in on Rush's web site:

Here is the property html code: fp.rushlimbaugh.com/@v=0206040719@/home/daily/site_060302/content/truth.Par.0002.ImageFile.MDIwNjA0MTAxNjEw.gif"

If a picture is worth a thousand words, this morphing picture is a book about how Rush feels about our President. Rush is a vicious and petty POS, and this morphing picture proves it. Rush must have hired some of the Rat butt boys from the Clinton Outhouse to do this.

[Mo1]

Mo, you either misquote me or misinterpret my point almost every time we correspond. I did NOT call you a socialist!!

Well gee Bill .. I support our President and I love our country worts and all .. so you tell me .. What would you call me???

[A Citizen Reporter]

"It seems to me FR was all about freedom. I found it pretty dishearten when points of debate about policy (read FR purpose statement) was being lost to nothing more than flaming threads that read "I'm a real supporter of Bush and your are not ..."

Sorry, but you seem to have taken this discussion off topic: Here is what I said:

"I mean seriously, since 1999 we've been through a national election, in which your candidate had a virtual coup d'etat against him. A circus of lawsuits in Florida, in an attempt to usurp a legitimate US election. We've been attacked on our own soil, by islamic fundamentalists who hi-jacked civilian airliners and used them as bombs, we've gone to war......In all of that three years, the first issue that compelled you to post was a hyped-up story from the NYT that Rush used to get ratings? Color me skeptical"

Oh, and btw welcome and all that rot......

[WRhine]

It did not conflict with any position Bush has taken either as president or candidate. You have no way out. I would suggest you drop it. You are now just appearing petulant.

You sound like a paid shill. Do you have ANY disagreements with this administration? Spin, Spin, Spin is all I ever see out of you...though you do share some company there.

[A Citizen Reporter]

Still making generalizations, I see.......

[Darlin']

Well, Mo, I believe messers Washington, Franklin, Madison, Hamilton et al would join me in calling you a patriot. An American patriot. :)