To: pabianice
He has no choice but to uphold the Brady Law. It's the LAW! He can't pick and choose which laws he will and will not uphold, if he did the liberals would have him for lunch. It's up to congress to get rid of the bad laws, he's only the enforcer. Everyone gets their panties in a wad on this matter and he is only doing what he is sworn to do.
7 posted on
06/04/2002 10:47:36 AM PDT by
ladtx
To: ladtx
Exactly right!
9 posted on
06/04/2002 10:49:26 AM PDT by
Lower55
To: ladtx
What you say is usually true, but his statements about the governments' view of a law or how it conflicts with previous statements by this administration do have an impact.
12 posted on
06/04/2002 10:55:25 AM PDT by
wardaddy
To: ladtx
He has no choice but to uphold the Brady Law. It's the LAW! He
can't pick and choose which laws he will and will not uphold, Boy I wish Janet Reno had known that.
13 posted on
06/04/2002 11:02:33 AM PDT by
itsahoot
To: ladtx
He has no choice but to uphold the Brady Law. It's the LAW! He can't pick and choose which laws he will and will not uphold, if he did the liberals would have him for lunch. Exactly right. Apparently logic has escaped many a Freeper.
To: ladtx
He has no choice but to uphold the Brady Law. It's the LAW!All laws which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.
Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803)
-archy-/-
16 posted on
06/04/2002 11:18:54 AM PDT by
archy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson